LUDG (Ludwig Enterprises) Piotroski F-Score: 2 (As of Aug. 02, 2026) — 50% Below Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Ludwig Enterprises Piotroski F-Score?

Ludwig Enterprises LUDG Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Aug. 02, 2026, which is 50% below its 10-year median of 4.00. The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 800 Medical Devices & Instruments companies, Ludwig Enterprises ranks worse than 90.25% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ludwig Enterprises has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ludwig Enterprises's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LUDG' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 4
Current: 2

During the past 4 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Ludwig Enterprises was 4. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Ludwig Enterprises  (OTCPK:LUDG) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Ludwig Enterprises Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Ludwig Enterprises Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Ludwig Enterprises's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Ludwig Enterprises Piotroski F-Score Chart

Ludwig Enterprises Annual Data
Trend Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A 4.00 3.00

Ludwig Enterprises Quarterly Data
Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A N/A 4.00 3.00 2.00

LUDG vs TNON, POAS, XAIR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Medical Devices subindustry, Ludwig Enterprises's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Ludwig Enterprises Piotroski F-Score vs Medical Devices & Instruments Industry

For the Medical Devices & Instruments industry and Healthcare sector, Ludwig Enterprises's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Ludwig Enterprises's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.649 + 0.031 + -1.077 + 0.219 = $-1.48 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.411 + -0.131 + -0.013 + -0.153 = $-0.71 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(0.253 + 0.401 + 0.262 + 0.248 + 1.265) / 5 = $0.4858 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $0.25 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.26 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $5.29 Mil.
Net Income was -0.364 + -0.886 + -0.156 + -0.541 = $-1.95 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(0.35 + 0.246 + 0.137 + 0.198 + 0.253) / 5 = $0.2368 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $0.35 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.25 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $3.01 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ludwig Enterprises's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.48. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ludwig Enterprises's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.71. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-1.476/0.253
=-5.83399209

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-1.947/0.35
=-5.56285714

Ludwig Enterprises's return on assets of this year was -5.83399209. Ludwig Enterprises's return on assets of last year was -5.56285714. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Ludwig Enterprises's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.48. Ludwig Enterprises's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.71. ==> -0.71 > -1.48 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0/0.4858
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/0.2368
=0

Ludwig Enterprises's gearing of this year was 0. Ludwig Enterprises's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.255/5.293
=0.04817684

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.253/3.006
=0.084165

Ludwig Enterprises's current ratio of this year was 0.04817684. Ludwig Enterprises's current ratio of last year was 0.084165. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Ludwig Enterprises's number of shares in issue this year was 864.591. Ludwig Enterprises's number of shares in issue last year was 161.182. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Ludwig Enterprises's gross margin of this year was . Ludwig Enterprises's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0/0.253
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=0/0.35
=0

Ludwig Enterprises's asset turnover of this year was 0. Ludwig Enterprises's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ludwig Enterprises has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 2 mean?
Ludwig Enterprises (LUDG) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Aug. 02, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Ludwig Enterprises and its competitors. This is 50% below median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Ludwig Enterprises' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 4.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Ludwig Enterprises ranks #722 out of 800 companies in the Medical Devices & Instruments industry, placing it in the top 90.2%.
Is Ludwig Enterprises' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Ludwig Enterprises' current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 50% below median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 4.00. The Medical Devices & Instruments industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Ludwig Enterprises' value of 2 is 60% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Ludwig Enterprises ranks #722 out of 800 companies in the Medical Devices & Instruments industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers.
How does Ludwig Enterprises' Piotroski F-Score compare to TNON and POAS?
According to the Medical Devices & Instruments industry distribution chart, Ludwig Enterprises ranks #722 out of 800 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Ludwig Enterprises in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Ludwig Enterprises' value of 2 is 60% below this benchmark. Historically, Ludwig Enterprises' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 4.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Ludwig Enterprises has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Medical Devices & Instruments company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Medical Devices & Instruments companies is 5.00, based on 800 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Ludwig Enterprises's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 60% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Ludwig Enterprises and its competitors. For the Medical Devices & Instruments industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Ludwig Enterprises's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 50% below median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Ludwig Enterprises stock overvalued right now?
Ludwig Enterprises (LUDG) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 2. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 50% below median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 60% below the Medical Devices & Instruments industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Ludwig Enterprises (LUDG), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Aug. 02, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Ludwig Enterprises Business Description

Address 8950 SW 74th Ct, Suite 2201-A149, Miami, FL, USA, 33156
Ludwig Enterprises Inc is an early-stage genomic technology company focused on developing screening tests for inflammation-related chronic diseases, including cancers. Its platform integrates mRNA inflammatory biomarkers, proprietary machine-learning algorithms, and at-home cheek swab collection kits designed to provide a differentiated and patient-friendly approach to cancer screening. The company's business model combines a business-to-business-to-consumer (B2B2C) approach with partnerships through CLIA-certified laboratories. It is focused on offering home collection kits directly to patients, supported by certified genetic counselors, while also enabling independent laboratories to provide the Revealia Breast test (Ludwig's key product candidate) as a Laboratory Developed Test (LDT).