MECPF (Mustang Energy) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jun. 24, 2026) — Near Median


What is Mustang Energy Piotroski F-Score?

Mustang Energy MECPF Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 3.00. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 174 Other Energy Sources companies, Mustang Energy ranks worse than 60.34% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Mustang Energy has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Mustang Energy's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

MECPF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 7
Current: 3

During the past 9 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Mustang Energy was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.

Mustang Energy  (OTCPK:MECPF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Mustang Energy Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Mustang Energy Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Mustang Energy's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Mustang Energy Piotroski F-Score Chart

Mustang Energy Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 2.00 4.00 3.00 7.00 2.00

Mustang Energy Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00

MECPF vs UEC, LEU: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Uranium subindustry, Mustang Energy's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Mustang Energy Piotroski F-Score vs Other Energy Sources Industry

For the Other Energy Sources industry and Energy sector, Mustang Energy's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Mustang Energy's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.572 + -0.43 + -1.2 + -0.534 = $-2.74 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.596 + -0.22 + 0 + -0.168 = $-0.98 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(7.03 + 8.555 + 9.621 + 0 + 8) / 5 = $8.3015 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $7.03 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.24 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.58 Mil.
Net Income was -0.24 + -0.185 + -1.046 + -1.287 = $-2.76 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(1.164 + 1.067 + 1.421 + 7.168 + 7.03) / 5 = $3.57 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $1.16 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2.14 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.53 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Mustang Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was -2.74. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Mustang Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.98. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-2.736/7.03
=-0.38918919

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-2.758/1.164
=-2.36941581

Mustang Energy's return on assets of this year was -0.38918919. Mustang Energy's return on assets of last year was -2.36941581. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Mustang Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was -2.74. Mustang Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.98. ==> -0.98 > -2.74 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0/8.3015
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/3.57
=0

Mustang Energy's gearing of this year was 0. Mustang Energy's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.236/0.579
=0.40759931

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.136/0.53
=4.03018868

Mustang Energy's current ratio of this year was 0.40759931. Mustang Energy's current ratio of last year was 4.03018868. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Mustang Energy's number of shares in issue this year was 96.478. Mustang Energy's number of shares in issue last year was 64.368. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Mustang Energy's gross margin of this year was . Mustang Energy's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0/7.03
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=0/1.164
=0

Mustang Energy's asset turnover of this year was 0. Mustang Energy's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+1+0+0+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Mustang Energy has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Mustang Energy (MECPF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Mustang Energy and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Mustang Energy's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Mustang Energy ranks #105 out of 174 companies in the Other Energy Sources industry, placing it in the top 60.3%.
Is Mustang Energy's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Mustang Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is near median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Other Energy Sources industry median Piotroski F-Score is 4.00. Mustang Energy's value of 3 is 25% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Mustang Energy ranks #105 out of 174 companies in the Other Energy Sources industry, which is below the industry midpoint.
How does Mustang Energy's Piotroski F-Score compare to UEC and LEU?
According to the Other Energy Sources industry distribution chart, Mustang Energy ranks #105 out of 174 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Mustang Energy in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 4.00. Mustang Energy's value of 3 is 25% below this benchmark. Historically, Mustang Energy's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 4.00, Mustang Energy has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Other Energy Sources company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Other Energy Sources companies is 4.00, based on 174 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Mustang Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 25% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Mustang Energy and its competitors. For the Other Energy Sources industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 4.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Mustang Energy's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Mustang Energy stock overvalued right now?
Mustang Energy (MECPF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 25% below the Other Energy Sources industry median of 4.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Mustang Energy (MECPF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Mustang Energy Business Description

Other Exchanges 92T0:GermanyMEC:Canada
Address 789 West Pender Street, Suite 480, Vancouver, BC, CAN
Mustang Energy Corp is a mineral exploration and development company. The Company currently conducts its operations in Canada, in one business segment, being the exploration of resource properties. The company's projects are Dutton Project, Yellowstone Project, Konigsstuhl Project, Spur Project, Yellowstone East Project, 914W Project.