EQT (MEX:EQT) Piotroski F-Score: 7 (As of Jun. 28, 2026) — 40% Above Median


MEX:EQT EQT Corp MEX:EQT
69 GF Score
Price MXN914.00
GF Value MXN1,041.13
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is EQT Piotroski F-Score?

EQT MEX:EQT 69 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 28, 2026, which is 40% above its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates MEX:EQT with a GF Score™ of 69/100 and a GF Value™ of MXN1,041.13 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 976 Oil & Gas companies, EQT ranks better than 92.52% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

EQT has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for EQT's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

MEX:EQT' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of EQT was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

EQT  (MEX:EQT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


EQT Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


EQT Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for EQT's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

EQT Piotroski F-Score Chart

EQT Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 7.00 5.00 3.00 8.00

EQT Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 7.00

MEX:EQT vs TPL, EXE, DVN: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Oil & Gas E&P subindustry, EQT's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


EQT Piotroski F-Score vs Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, EQT's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where EQT's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


MEX:EQT
69GF Score
EQT Corp MEX:EQT
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 14764.861 + 6161.12 + 12191.641 + 26818.754 = MXN59,936 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 23380.199 + 18668.874 + 20263.381 + 55090.746 = MXN117,403 Mil.
Revenue was 34603.456 + 33437.569 + 40943.269 + 65224.366 = MXN174,209 Mil.
Gross Profit was 13814.043 + 12088.277 + 19951.648 + 44120.535 = MXN89,975 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(812259.362 + 746893.132 + 755694.639 + 752509.952 + 751824.342) / 5 = MXN763836.2854 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was MXN812,259 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was MXN98,907 Mil.
Total Current Assets was MXN28,072 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was MXN42,661 Mil.
Net Income was 174.352 + -5923.295 + 8725.921 + 4953.728 = MXN7,931 Mil.

Revenue was 16326.491 + 23962.819 + 37712.737 + 49483.66 = MXN127,486 Mil.
Gross Profit was -3781.654 + 1831.198 + 14546.079 + 27236.963 = MXN39,833 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(422180.846 + 452625.057 + 786540.632 + 830687.849 + 812259.362) / 5 = MXN660858.7492 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was MXN422,181 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was MXN165,871 Mil.
Total Current Assets was MXN35,579 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was MXN62,649 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

EQT's current Net Income (TTM) was 59,936. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

EQT's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 117,403. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=59936.376/812259.362
=0.0737897

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=7930.706/422180.846
=0.01878509

EQT's return on assets of this year was 0.0737897. EQT's return on assets of last year was 0.01878509. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

EQT's current Net Income (TTM) was 59,936. EQT's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 117,403. ==> 117,403 > 59,936 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=98906.907/763836.2854
=0.12948705

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=165870.646/660858.7492
=0.25099259

EQT's gearing of this year was 0.12948705. EQT's gearing of last year was 0.25099259. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=28071.757/42661.076
=0.65801803

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=35578.835/62648.594
=0.56791115

EQT's current ratio of this year was 0.65801803. EQT's current ratio of last year was 0.56791115. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

EQT's number of shares in issue this year was 629.209. EQT's number of shares in issue last year was 602.838. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=89974.503/174208.66
=0.51647549

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=39832.586/127485.707
=0.31244747

EQT's gross margin of this year was 0.51647549. EQT's gross margin of last year was 0.31244747. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=174208.66/812259.362
=0.21447418

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=127485.707/422180.846
=0.30196942

EQT's asset turnover of this year was 0.21447418. EQT's asset turnover of last year was 0.30196942. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1+0
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

EQT has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 7 mean?
EQT (MEX:EQT) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Jun. 28, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on EQT and its competitors. This is 40% above median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, EQT's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, EQT ranks #73 out of 976 companies in the Oil & Gas industry, placing it in the top 7.5%.
Is EQT's Piotroski F-Score too high?
EQT's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 8.00. The Oil & Gas industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. EQT's value of 7 is 40% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, EQT ranks #73 out of 976 companies in the Oil & Gas industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, EQT has a GF Score™ of 69/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does EQT's Piotroski F-Score compare to TPL and EXE?
According to the Oil & Gas industry distribution chart, EQT ranks #73 out of 976 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places EQT in the top 8% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. EQT's value of 7 is 40% above this benchmark. Historically, EQT's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, EQT has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Oil & Gas company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Oil & Gas companies is 5.00, based on 976 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. EQT's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on EQT and its competitors. For the Oil & Gas industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. EQT's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 40% above median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is EQT stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, EQT (MEX:EQT) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is MXN1,041.13, compared to a current price of MXN914.00 — trading 12.2% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 40% above median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 40% above the Oil & Gas industry median of 5.00. EQT's overall GF Score™ is 69/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For EQT (MEX:EQT), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 28, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is EQT (MEX:EQT) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, EQT stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of MXN914.00 is trading 12.2% below its estimated GF Value™ of MXN1,041.13. GuruFocus considers EQT to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for MEX:EQT:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 7 (40% above median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: MXN1,041.13 vs. price of MXN914.00 (12.2% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 69/100 with 3 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% above the Oil & Gas median (#73 of 976)

No single metric tells the full story. See the MEX:EQT stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


EQT Business Description

Industry EnergyOil & Gas
Address 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 15222
EQT is an independent natural gas production company. It focuses its operations in the cores of the Marcellus and Utica shales, located in the Appalachian Basin in the Eastern United States. Its main customers include marketers, utilities, and industrial operators in the Appalachian Basin. The company has three reportable segments in production, gathering, and its transmission segment, which is now an operated joint venture with Blackstone. All the firm's operating revenue is generated in the US, with most revenue flowing from the Marcellus Shale field and through the sale of natural gas.
69GF Score

Get the complete analysis for MEX:EQT

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

MXN914.00
Price
MXN1,041.13
GF Value