MQT (BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,) Piotroski F-Score: 1 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — 83% Below Median


MQT BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, INC. MQT
20 GF Score
Price $11.05
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, Piotroski F-Score?

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, MQT 20 Piotroski F-Score is 1 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 83% below its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates MQT with a GF Scoreâ„¢ of 20/100. The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 1 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, has an F-score of 1. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

MQT' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 6   Max: 7
Current: 1

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, was 7. The lowest was 1. And the median was 6.

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,  (NYSE:MQT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, Piotroski F-Score Chart

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, Annual Data
Trend Apr18 Apr19 Apr20 Apr21 Apr22 Jul23 Jul24 Jul25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 7.00 4.00 7.00 7.00 1.00

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, Semi-Annual Data
Oct17 Apr18 Oct18 Apr19 Oct19 Apr20 Oct20 Apr21 Oct21 Apr22 Jan23 Jul23 Jan24 Jul24 Jan25 Jul25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 1.00

MQT vs MCR, MVT, ERC: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Asset Management subindustry, BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, Piotroski F-Score vs Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score falls into.


MQT
20GF Score
BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, INC. MQT
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jul25) TTM:Last Year (Jul24) TTM:
Net Income was $-15.17 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $-19.23 Mil.
Revenue was $-14.73 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jul24)
to the end of this year (Jul25) was (387.391 + 388.996) / 2 = $388.1935 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jul24) was $387.39 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $78.23 Mil.
Total Assets was $389.00 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $159.54 Mil.
Net Income was $9.85 Mil.

Revenue was $10.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jul23)
to the end of last year (Jul24) was (403.721 + 387.391) / 2 = $395.556 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jul23) was $403.72 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $44.75 Mil.
Total Assets was $387.39 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $129.30 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current Net Income (TTM) was -15.17. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -19.23. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jul24)
=-15.171/387.391
=-0.03916198

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jul23)
=9.854/403.721
=0.02440795

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s return on assets of this year was -0.03916198. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s return on assets of last year was 0.02440795. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current Net Income (TTM) was -15.17. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -19.23. ==> -19.23 <= -15.17 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jul25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jul24 to Jul25
=78.23/388.1935
=0.20152321

Gearing (Last Year: Jul24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jul23 to Jul24
=44.747/395.556
=0.11312431

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s gearing of this year was 0.20152321. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s gearing of last year was 0.11312431. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Jul25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=388.996/159.544
=2.4381738

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jul24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=387.391/129.298
=2.99610976

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current ratio of this year was 2.4381738. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current ratio of last year was 2.99610976. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s number of shares in issue this year was 22.311. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s number of shares in issue last year was 20.966. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=-15.171/-14.732
=1.02979908

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=9.854/10.003
=0.98510447

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s net margin of this year was 1.02979908. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s net margin of last year was 0.98510447. ==> This year's net margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jul24)
=-14.732/387.391
=-0.03802876

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jul23)
=10.003/403.721
=0.02477701

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s asset turnover of this year was -0.03802876. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s asset turnover of last year was 0.02477701. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+0+0+0+0+1+0
=1

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, has an F-score of 1. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 1 mean?
BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, (MQT) has a Piotroski F-Score of 1 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, and its competitors. This is 83% below median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00.
Is BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score too high?
BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current Piotroski F-Score of 1 is 83% below median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 7.00. The Asset Management industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s value of 1 is 80% below this industry median. Overall, BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, has a GF Scoreâ„¢ of 20/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score compare to MCR and MVT?
BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s Piotroski F-Score of 1 can be compared against companies in the Asset Management industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s value of 1 is 80% below this benchmark. Historically, BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Asset Management company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Asset Management companies is 5.00, based on 1,601 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current Piotroski F-Score of 1 is 80% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, and its competitors. For the Asset Management industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s current Piotroski F-Score is 1, which is 83% below median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, stock overvalued right now?
BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, (MQT) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 1. The current Piotroski F-Score is 1, which is 83% below median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 80% below the Asset Management industry median of 5.00. BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II,'s overall GF Score™ is 20/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, (MQT), the current Piotroski F-Score is 1 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, Business Description

Address 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE, USA, 19809
BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD QUALITY FUND II, INC. is a diversified, closed-end investment management company. Its investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from U.S federal income taxes. The majority of its managed assets are invested in municipal bonds exempt from U.S. federal income taxes. The fund invests in municipal bonds that are in the three highest quality rating categories, or are deemed to be of comparable quality by the investment adviser at the time of investment. These are mainly long-term municipal bonds with maturities of more than ten years at the time of investment, having exposure to different sectors. The fund can also invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
20GF Score

Get the complete analysis for MQT

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$11.05
Price