NAD (Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — Near Median


NAD Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund NAD
58 GF Score
Price $12.00
GF Value $16.06
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund Piotroski F-Score?

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund NAD +0.17% 58 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates NAD with a GF Score™ of 58/100 and a GF Value™ of $16.06 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,601 Asset Management companies, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund ranks better than 65.08% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

NAD' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 5

During the past 9 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund  (NYSE:NAD) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund Piotroski F-Score Chart

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund Annual Data
Trend Oct17 Oct18 Oct19 Oct20 Oct21 Oct22 Oct23 Oct24 Oct25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 6.00 3.00 8.00 6.00 5.00

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund Semi-Annual Data
Oct17 Apr18 Oct18 Apr19 Oct19 Apr20 Oct20 Apr21 Oct21 Apr22 Oct22 Apr23 Oct23 Apr24 Oct24 Apr25 Oct25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 8.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 5.00

NAD vs DBRG, NVG, HTGC: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Asset Management subindustry, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund Piotroski F-Score vs Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


NAD
58GF Score
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund NAD
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Oct25) TTM:Last Year (Oct24) TTM:
Net Income was $65.36 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $251.56 Mil.
Revenue was $71.60 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Oct24)
to the end of this year (Oct25) was (5109.423 + 4908.728) / 2 = $5009.0755 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Oct24) was $5,109.42 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was $4,908.73 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $2,053.09 Mil.
Net Income was $467.63 Mil.

Revenue was $474.17 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Oct23)
to the end of last year (Oct24) was (4717.228 + 5109.423) / 2 = $4913.3255 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Oct23) was $4,717.23 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $13.31 Mil.
Total Assets was $5,109.42 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $2,110.01 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current Net Income (TTM) was 65.36. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 251.56. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Oct24)
=65.356/5109.423
=0.01279127

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Oct23)
=467.629/4717.228
=0.09913216

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's return on assets of this year was 0.01279127. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's return on assets of last year was 0.09913216. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current Net Income (TTM) was 65.36. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 251.56. ==> 251.56 > 65.36 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Oct25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Oct24 to Oct25
=0/5009.0755
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Oct24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Oct23 to Oct24
=13.312/4913.3255
=0.00270937

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's gearing of this year was 0. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's gearing of last year was 0.00270937. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Oct25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=4908.728/2053.088
=2.39089995

Current Ratio (Last Year: Oct24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=5109.423/2110.009
=2.42151716

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current ratio of this year was 2.39089995. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current ratio of last year was 2.42151716. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's number of shares in issue this year was 233.415. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's number of shares in issue last year was 233.814. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=65.356/71.597
=0.91283154

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=467.629/474.169
=0.98620745

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's net margin of this year was 0.91283154. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's net margin of last year was 0.98620745. ==> Last year's net margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Oct24)
=71.597/5109.423
=0.01401274

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Oct23)
=474.169/4717.228
=0.10051857

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's asset turnover of this year was 0.01401274. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's asset turnover of last year was 0.10051857. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund (NAD) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund ranks #559 out of 1601 companies in the Asset Management industry, placing it in the top 34.9%.
Is Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Asset Management industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund ranks #559 out of 1601 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund has a GF Score™ of 58/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's Piotroski F-Score compare to DBRG and NVG?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund ranks #559 out of 1601 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Asset Management company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Asset Management companies is 5.00, based on 1,601 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund and its competitors. For the Asset Management industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund (NAD) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $16.06, compared to a current price of $12.00 — trading 25.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Asset Management industry median of 5.00. Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund's overall GF Score™ is 58/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund (NAD), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund (NAD) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $12.00 is trading 25.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of $16.06. GuruFocus considers Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for NAD:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: $16.06 vs. price of $12.00 (25.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 58/100 with 7 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Asset Management median (#559 of 1601)

No single metric tells the full story. See the NAD stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Nuveen Quality Municipalome Fund Business Description

Address 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, USA, 60606
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. Its investment objective is to provide current income exempted from regular federal income tax by investing in tax-exempt municipal securities that the Fund's investment adviser believes are underrated or undervalued or that represent municipal market sectors that are undervalued.
58GF Score

Get the complete analysis for NAD

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$12.00
Price
$16.06
GF Value