Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Robinhood MarketsNEOE:ZHOO 57 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Aug. 06, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates NEOE:ZHOO with a GF Score™ of 57/100 and a GF Value™ of C$5.63 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 785 Capital Markets companies, Robinhood Markets ranks better than 65.86% on this metric.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Robinhood Markets has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
The historical rank and industry rank for Robinhood Markets's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
NEOE:ZHOO'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3 Med: 5 Max: 8
Current: 5
During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Robinhood Markets was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Robinhood Markets Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Robinhood Markets Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Robinhood Markets's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
NEOE:ZHOO vs IBKR, LPLA, TW: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Capital Markets subindustry, Robinhood Markets's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Robinhood Markets Piotroski F-Score vs Capital Markets Industry
For the Capital Markets industry and Financial Services sector, Robinhood Markets's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Robinhood Markets's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
This Year (Jun26) TTM:
Last Year (Jun25) TTM:
Net Income was 769.17 + 834.598 + 480.2 + 787.307 = C$2,871 Mil. Cash Flow from Operations was -2180.238 + -1292.592 + 2796.136 + 1010.448 = C$334 Mil. Revenue was 1762.452 + 1769.899 + 1463.924 + 1835.647 = C$6,832 Mil. Gross Profit was 1528.657 + 1354.669 + 1381.604 + 1748.636 = C$6,014 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun25)
to the end of this year (Jun26) was
(48280.843 + 57344.697 + 52609.992 + 62390.328 + 79362.27) / 5 = C$59997.626 Mil. Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun25) was C$48,281 Mil. Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$3,045 Mil. Total Current Assets was C$76,530 Mil. Total Current Liabilities was C$62,558 Mil.
Net Income was 203.19 + 1305.025 + 482.362 + 527.585 = C$2,518 Mil.
Revenue was 862.88 + 1444.646 + 1330.801 + 1351.765 = C$4,990 Mil. Gross Profit was 698.974 + 1092.745 + 1096.798 + 1105.741 = C$3,994 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun24)
to the end of last year (Jun25) was
(56664.693 + 58579.677 + 37308.619 + 39503.405 + 48280.843) / 5 = C$48067.4474 Mil. Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun24) was C$56,665 Mil. Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0 Mil. Total Current Assets was C$46,243 Mil. Total Current Liabilities was C$37,070 Mil.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Robinhood Markets's current Net Income (TTM) was 2,871.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Robinhood Markets's return on assets of this year was 0.05947027. Robinhood Markets's return on assets of last year was 0.0444397.
==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Robinhood Markets's gearing of this year was 0.05075831. Robinhood Markets's gearing of last year was 0.
==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Robinhood Markets's current ratio of this year was 1.2233489. Robinhood Markets's current ratio of last year was 1.24743748.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Robinhood Markets's number of shares in issue this year was 912. Robinhood Markets's number of shares in issue last year was 909.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Robinhood Markets's gross margin of this year was 0.88021585. Robinhood Markets's gross margin of last year was 0.80043775.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Robinhood Markets's asset turnover of this year was 0.14150378. Robinhood Markets's asset turnover of last year was 0.08806351.
==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
=
5
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Robinhood Markets has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
Robinhood Markets (NEOE:ZHOO) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Aug. 06, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Robinhood Markets and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Robinhood Markets' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Robinhood Markets ranks #268 out of 785 companies in the Capital Markets industry, placing it in the top 34.1%.
Is Robinhood Markets' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Robinhood Markets' current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Capital Markets industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Robinhood Markets' value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Robinhood Markets ranks #268 out of 785 companies in the Capital Markets industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Robinhood Markets has a GF Score™ of 57/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Robinhood Markets' Piotroski F-Score compare to IBKR and LPLA?
According to the Capital Markets industry distribution chart, Robinhood Markets ranks #268 out of 785 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Robinhood Markets in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Robinhood Markets' value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Robinhood Markets' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Robinhood Markets has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Capital Markets company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Capital Markets companies is 5.00, based on 785 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Robinhood Markets's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Robinhood Markets and its competitors. For the Capital Markets industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Robinhood Markets's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Robinhood Markets stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Robinhood Markets (NEOE:ZHOO) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is C$5.63, compared to a current price of C$6.77 — trading 20.2% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Capital Markets industry median of 5.00. Robinhood Markets' overall GF Score™ is 57/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Robinhood Markets (NEOE:ZHOO), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Aug. 06, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Robinhood Markets (NEOE:ZHOO) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Robinhood Markets stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of C$6.77 is trading 20.2% above its estimated GF Value™ of C$5.63.
GuruFocus considers Robinhood Markets to be Modestly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for NEOE:ZHOO:
Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
GF Value™: C$5.63 vs. price of C$6.77 (20.2% above fair value)
Industry Position: 0% at the Capital Markets median (#268 of 785)
No single metric tells the full story. See the NEOE:ZHOO stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Robinhood is a diversified financial services provider best known for its retail brokerage platform, which historically caters to a young, risk-seeking clientele that trades heavily on margin and in higher-risk asset classes like options, futures, cryptocurrencies, and more recently, in prediction markets. As those customers' financial needs have begun to mature, Robinhood has rolled out a suite of more conventional products, from retirement accounts to high-yield cash sweep accounts to nascent advisory services (Robinhood Strategies). With $322 billion in customer assets and 27 million active accounts at year-end 2025, the firm has emerged as a significant player in the large, quickly growing US brokerage market.
57GF Score
Get the complete analysis for NEOE:ZHOO
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
NEOE:ZHOO has been successfully added to your 
