NEOJF (NeoJapan) Piotroski F-Score: 9 (As of Jul. 04, 2026) — 50% Above Median


NEOJF NeoJapan Inc NEOJF
83 GF Score
Price $10.36
GF Value $11.86
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
View Full Analysis

What is NeoJapan Piotroski F-Score?

NeoJapan NEOJF 83 Piotroski F-Score is 9 as of Jul. 04, 2026, which is 50% above its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates NEOJF with a GF Score™ of 83/100 and a GF Value™ of $11.86 (Modestly Undervalued). Among 2,742 Software companies, NeoJapan ranks better than 99.96% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 9, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NeoJapan has an F-score of 9. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for NeoJapan's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

NEOJF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 9

During the past 12 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of NeoJapan was 9. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.

NeoJapan  (OTCPK:NEOJF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


NeoJapan Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


NeoJapan Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for NeoJapan's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

NeoJapan Piotroski F-Score Chart

NeoJapan Annual Data
Trend Jan17 Jan18 Jan19 Jan20 Jan21 Jan22 Jan23 Jan24 Jan25 Jan26
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 6.00 9.00 8.00 9.00

NeoJapan Quarterly Data
Jul21 Oct21 Jan22 Apr22 Jul22 Oct22 Jan23 Apr23 Jul23 Oct23 Jan24 Apr24 Jul24 Oct24 Jan25 Apr25 Jul25 Oct25 Jan26 Apr26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00

NEOJF vs UBER, SHOP, CRM: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Application subindustry, NeoJapan's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


NeoJapan Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, NeoJapan's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where NeoJapan's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


NEOJF
83GF Score
NeoJapan Inc NEOJF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jan26) TTM:Last Year (Jan25) TTM:
Net Income was $11.55 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $14.33 Mil.
Revenue was $52.54 Mil.
Gross Profit was $30.24 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jan25)
to the end of this year (Jan26) was (59.051 + 68.264) / 2 = $63.6575 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jan25) was $59.05 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $49.46 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $17.73 Mil.
Net Income was $9.04 Mil.

Revenue was $46.42 Mil.
Gross Profit was $25.77 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jan24)
to the end of last year (Jan25) was (58.943 + 59.051) / 2 = $58.997 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jan24) was $58.94 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $41.99 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $16.07 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NeoJapan's current Net Income (TTM) was 11.55. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NeoJapan's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 14.33. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jan25)
=11.551/59.051
=0.19561057

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jan24)
=9.037/58.943
=0.15331761

NeoJapan's return on assets of this year was 0.19561057. NeoJapan's return on assets of last year was 0.15331761. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

NeoJapan's current Net Income (TTM) was 11.55. NeoJapan's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 14.33. ==> 14.33 > 11.55 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jan26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jan25 to Jan26
=0/63.6575
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jan25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jan24 to Jan25
=0/58.997
=0

NeoJapan's gearing of this year was 0. NeoJapan's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jan26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=49.455/17.731
=2.78918279

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jan25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=41.986/16.071
=2.61253189

NeoJapan's current ratio of this year was 2.78918279. NeoJapan's current ratio of last year was 2.61253189. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

NeoJapan's number of shares in issue this year was 14.008. NeoJapan's number of shares in issue last year was 14.113. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=30.237/52.539
=0.57551533

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=25.767/46.417
=0.55511989

NeoJapan's gross margin of this year was 0.57551533. NeoJapan's gross margin of last year was 0.55511989. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jan25)
=52.539/59.051
=0.88972244

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jan24)
=46.417/58.943
=0.78748961

NeoJapan's asset turnover of this year was 0.88972244. NeoJapan's asset turnover of last year was 0.78748961. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
=9

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NeoJapan has an F-score of 9. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 9 mean?
NeoJapan (NEOJF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 9 as of Jul. 04, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on NeoJapan and its competitors. This is 50% above median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, NeoJapan's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, NeoJapan ranks #1 out of 2742 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 0%.
Is NeoJapan's Piotroski F-Score too high?
NeoJapan's current Piotroski F-Score of 9 is 50% above median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 9.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. NeoJapan's value of 9 is 80% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, NeoJapan ranks #1 out of 2742 companies in the Software industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, NeoJapan has a GF Score™ of 83/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does NeoJapan's Piotroski F-Score compare to UBER and SHOP?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, NeoJapan ranks #1 out of 2742 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places NeoJapan in the top 0% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. NeoJapan's value of 9 is 80% above this benchmark. Historically, NeoJapan's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, NeoJapan has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,742 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. NeoJapan's current Piotroski F-Score of 9 is 80% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on NeoJapan and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. NeoJapan's current Piotroski F-Score is 9, which is 50% above median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is NeoJapan stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, NeoJapan (NEOJF) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $11.86, compared to a current price of $10.36 — trading 12.7% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 9, which is 50% above median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 80% above the Software industry median of 5.00. NeoJapan's overall GF Score™ is 83/100. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For NeoJapan (NEOJF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 9 as of Jul. 04, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is NeoJapan (NEOJF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, NeoJapan stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $10.36 is trading 12.7% below its estimated GF Value™ of $11.86. GuruFocus considers NeoJapan to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for NEOJF:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 9 (50% above median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: $11.86 vs. price of $10.36 (12.7% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 83/100
  • Industry Position: 80% above the Software median (#1 of 2742)

No single metric tells the full story. See the NEOJF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


NeoJapan Business Description

Other Exchanges 3921:Japan
Address 2-2-1 Minatomirai, Nishi-ku, 10th Floor, Yokohama Landmark Tower, Kanagawa-ken, Yokohama, JPN, 220-8110
NeoJapan Inc develops and provides Internet application software, which includes a web-based groupware for information sharing within a firm. The firm mainly provides package software, application service and system integration. It offers desknet's NEO, a groupware software; AppSuite, a tool to create custom business applications; ChatLuck, a chat-based business communication tool; and desknet's DB, an online database system, which enables sharing of information. It also provides Denbun, a Web-based email system for corporate clients that manages, sends, and receives emails through a Web browser; desknet's DAX, a file transfer system; desknet's SSS, a Web-based sales management system; desknet's CAMS, a Web-based customer relationship management system; and desknet's Blog, a blog system.
83GF Score

Get the complete analysis for NEOJF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$10.36
Price
$11.86
GF Value