Byhmgard AB (NGM:BESS) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 28, 2026) — Near Median


NGM:BESS Byhmgard AB NGM:BESS
27 GF Score
Price kr0.29
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Byhmgard AB Piotroski F-Score?

Byhmgard AB NGM:BESS -2.72% 27 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 28, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates NGM:BESS with a GF Score™ of 27/100. The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 976 Oil & Gas companies, Byhmgard AB ranks worse than 58.81% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Byhmgard AB has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Byhmgard AB's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

NGM:BESS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 4

During the past 11 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Byhmgard AB was 7. The lowest was 1. And the median was 4.

Byhmgard AB  (NGM:BESS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Byhmgard AB Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Byhmgard AB Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Byhmgard AB's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Byhmgard AB Piotroski F-Score Chart

Byhmgard AB Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00

Byhmgard AB Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.00

NGM:BESS vs WMB, EPD, KMI: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Oil & Gas Midstream subindustry, Byhmgard AB's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Byhmgard AB Piotroski F-Score vs Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, Byhmgard AB's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Byhmgard AB's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


NGM:BESS
27GF Score
Byhmgard AB NGM:BESS
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -34.934 + -9.542 + -26.231 + -3.612 = kr-74.32 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -6.118 + -0.725 + 6.754 + -4.662 = kr-4.75 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 8.179 + 16.88 = kr25.06 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 4.417 + 5.571 = kr9.99 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(37.216 + 6.052 + 0.416 + 50.929 + 43.895) / 5 = kr27.7016 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was kr37.22 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr1.45 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr27.24 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr12.28 Mil.
Net Income was -9.391 + -109.918 + 1.839 + -3.017 = kr-120.49 Mil.

Revenue was 0.104 + 0.102 + 3.779 + 3.766 = kr7.75 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.104 + 0.102 + 6.72 + 2.549 = kr9.48 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(44.888 + 34.686 + 30 + 15.04 + 37.216) / 5 = kr32.366 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was kr44.89 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr32.54 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr39.00 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Byhmgard AB's current Net Income (TTM) was -74.32. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Byhmgard AB's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -4.75. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-74.319/37.216
=-1.99696367

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-120.487/44.888
=-2.68416949

Byhmgard AB's return on assets of this year was -1.99696367. Byhmgard AB's return on assets of last year was -2.68416949. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Byhmgard AB's current Net Income (TTM) was -74.32. Byhmgard AB's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -4.75. ==> -4.75 > -74.32 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=1.45/27.7016
=0.05234355

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/32.366
=0

Byhmgard AB's gearing of this year was 0.05234355. Byhmgard AB's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=27.238/12.279
=2.21825882

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=32.542/39.004
=0.83432468

Byhmgard AB's current ratio of this year was 2.21825882. Byhmgard AB's current ratio of last year was 0.83432468. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Byhmgard AB's number of shares in issue this year was 907.681. Byhmgard AB's number of shares in issue last year was 1.597. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=9.988/25.059
=0.39857935

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=9.475/7.751
=1.22242291

Byhmgard AB's gross margin of this year was 0.39857935. Byhmgard AB's gross margin of last year was 1.22242291. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=25.059/37.216
=0.67333942

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=7.751/44.888
=0.17267421

Byhmgard AB's asset turnover of this year was 0.67333942. Byhmgard AB's asset turnover of last year was 0.17267421. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+0+1+0+0+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Byhmgard AB has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Byhmgard AB (NGM:BESS) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 28, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Byhmgard AB and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Byhmgard AB's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Byhmgard AB ranks #574 out of 976 companies in the Oil & Gas industry, placing it in the top 58.8%.
Is Byhmgard AB's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Byhmgard AB's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 7.00. The Oil & Gas industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Byhmgard AB's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Byhmgard AB ranks #574 out of 976 companies in the Oil & Gas industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Byhmgard AB has a GF Score™ of 27/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Byhmgard AB's Piotroski F-Score compare to WMB and EPD?
According to the Oil & Gas industry distribution chart, Byhmgard AB ranks #574 out of 976 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Byhmgard AB in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Byhmgard AB's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Byhmgard AB's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Byhmgard AB has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Oil & Gas company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Oil & Gas companies is 5.00, based on 976 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Byhmgard AB's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Byhmgard AB and its competitors. For the Oil & Gas industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Byhmgard AB's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Byhmgard AB stock overvalued right now?
Byhmgard AB (NGM:BESS) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Oil & Gas industry median of 5.00. Byhmgard AB's overall GF Score™ is 27/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Byhmgard AB (NGM:BESS), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 28, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Byhmgard AB Business Description

Industry EnergyOil & Gas
Address Industrivagen 4, Halmstad, SWE, 302 41
Byhmgard AB develops, builds and invests in large-scale energy storage (BESS) projects in Europe. The business includes project development, EPC, software optimization and long-term operation. It aims to deliver critical energy solutions that enable Europe's green transition and strengthen the future energy infrastructure. The business model combines one-off revenues from EPC with recurring cash flows from energy management, operations, and support. Its operations span high-growth European markets including Sweden, Finland, Italy, Poland, and the Baltic states.
27GF Score

Get the complete analysis for NGM:BESS

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

kr0.29
Price