Latent View Analytics (NSE:LATENTVIEW) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 29, 2026) — Near Median


NSE:LATENTVIEW Latent View Analytics Ltd NSE:LATENTVIEW
79 GF Score
Price ₹297.90
GF Value ₹704.28
Valuation Significantly Undervalued
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Latent View Analytics Piotroski F-Score?

Latent View Analytics NSE:LATENTVIEW +0.42% 79 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 29, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates NSE:LATENTVIEW with a GF Score™ of 79/100 and a GF Value™ of ₹704.28 (Significantly Undervalued). The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,063 Business Services companies, Latent View Analytics ranks worse than 69.71% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Latent View Analytics has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Latent View Analytics's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

NSE:LATENTVIEW' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 6
Current: 4

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Latent View Analytics was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Latent View Analytics  (NSE:LATENTVIEW) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Latent View Analytics Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Latent View Analytics Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Latent View Analytics's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Latent View Analytics Piotroski F-Score Chart

Latent View Analytics Annual Data
Trend Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 6.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

Latent View Analytics Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00

NSE:LATENTVIEW vs VRSK, EFX, BAH: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Consulting Services subindustry, Latent View Analytics's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Latent View Analytics Piotroski F-Score vs Business Services Industry

For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Latent View Analytics's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Latent View Analytics's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


NSE:LATENTVIEW
79GF Score
Latent View Analytics Ltd NSE:LATENTVIEW
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 505.62 + 457.29 + 501.42 + 527.52 = ₹1,992 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = ₹0 Mil.
Revenue was 2360.23 + 2575.42 + 2780.09 + 2886.18 = ₹10,602 Mil.
Gross Profit was 760.51 + 896.11 + 916.91 + 967.04 = ₹3,541 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(17886.34 + 0 + 18958.59 + 0 + 20943.87) / 5 = ₹19262.93333333 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was ₹17,886 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹215 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹9,950 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹2,455 Mil.
Net Income was 389.26 + 407.03 + 418.95 + 534.76 = ₹1,750 Mil.

Revenue was 1788.8 + 2089.5 + 2278.36 + 2321.77 = ₹8,478 Mil.
Gross Profit was 573.07 + 656.6 + 809.04 + 830.91 = ₹2,870 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(14558.75 + 0 + 16597.94 + 0 + 17886.34) / 5 = ₹16347.67666667 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was ₹14,559 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹190 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹8,806 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹1,327 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Latent View Analytics's current Net Income (TTM) was 1,992. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Latent View Analytics's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=1991.85/17886.34
=0.11136152

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=1750/14558.75
=0.12020263

Latent View Analytics's return on assets of this year was 0.11136152. Latent View Analytics's return on assets of last year was 0.12020263. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Latent View Analytics's current Net Income (TTM) was 1,992. Latent View Analytics's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0. ==> 0 <= 1,992 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=215.47/19262.93333333
=0.01118573

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=190.34/16347.67666667
=0.01164324

Latent View Analytics's gearing of this year was 0.01118573. Latent View Analytics's gearing of last year was 0.01164324. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=9949.85/2454.63
=4.05350297

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=8805.86/1326.86
=6.63661577

Latent View Analytics's current ratio of this year was 4.05350297. Latent View Analytics's current ratio of last year was 6.63661577. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Latent View Analytics's number of shares in issue this year was 206.871. Latent View Analytics's number of shares in issue last year was 207.271. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3540.57/10601.92
=0.33395555

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2869.62/8478.43
=0.33846125

Latent View Analytics's gross margin of this year was 0.33395555. Latent View Analytics's gross margin of last year was 0.33846125. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=10601.92/17886.34
=0.59273837

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=8478.43/14558.75
=0.58235975

Latent View Analytics's asset turnover of this year was 0.59273837. Latent View Analytics's asset turnover of last year was 0.58235975. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+1+0+1+0+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Latent View Analytics has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Latent View Analytics (NSE:LATENTVIEW) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 29, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Latent View Analytics and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Latent View Analytics' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Latent View Analytics ranks #741 out of 1063 companies in the Business Services industry, placing it in the top 69.7%.
Is Latent View Analytics' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Latent View Analytics' current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 6.00. The Business Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Latent View Analytics' value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Latent View Analytics ranks #741 out of 1063 companies in the Business Services industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Latent View Analytics has a GF Score™ of 79/100 and is considered Significantly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Latent View Analytics' Piotroski F-Score compare to VRSK and EFX?
According to the Business Services industry distribution chart, Latent View Analytics ranks #741 out of 1063 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Latent View Analytics in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Latent View Analytics' value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Latent View Analytics' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Latent View Analytics has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Business Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Business Services companies is 5.00, based on 1,063 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Latent View Analytics's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Latent View Analytics and its competitors. For the Business Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Latent View Analytics's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Latent View Analytics stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Latent View Analytics (NSE:LATENTVIEW) is currently considered Significantly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is ₹704.28, compared to a current price of ₹297.90 — trading 57.7% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Business Services industry median of 5.00. Latent View Analytics' overall GF Score™ is 79/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Latent View Analytics (NSE:LATENTVIEW), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 29, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Latent View Analytics (NSE:LATENTVIEW) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Latent View Analytics stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of ₹297.90 is trading 57.7% below its estimated GF Value™ of ₹704.28. GuruFocus considers Latent View Analytics to be Significantly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for NSE:LATENTVIEW:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (near median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: ₹704.28 vs. price of ₹297.90 (57.7% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 79/100 with 4 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Business Services median (#741 of 1063)

No single metric tells the full story. See the NSE:LATENTVIEW stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Latent View Analytics Business Description

Other Exchanges 543398:India
Address 5th Floor, Neville Tower, Unit 6,7 and 8, Ramanujan IT City, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Taramani, Chennai, TN, IND, 600113
Latent View Analytics Ltd provides analytics services such as data and analytics consulting, business analytics and insights, predictive analytics, data engineering, and digital solutions. The company provides services to blue-chip companies in Technology, BFSI, CPG & Retail, Industrials, and other industry domains.
79GF Score

Get the complete analysis for NSE:LATENTVIEW

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

₹297.90
Price
₹704.28
GF Value