GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Energy » Oil & Gas » Norse Energy Corp. ASA (OSL:NEC) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Norse Energy ASA (OSL:NEC) Piotroski F-Score : 2 (As of May. 21, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Norse Energy ASA Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Norse Energy ASA has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Norse Energy ASA's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

OSL:NEC' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 2

During the past 9 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Norse Energy ASA was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.


Norse Energy ASA Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Norse Energy ASA's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Norse Energy ASA Piotroski F-Score Chart

Norse Energy ASA Annual Data
Trend Dec04 Dec05 Dec06 Dec07 Dec08 Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 6.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 2.00

Norse Energy ASA Quarterly Data
Dec08 Mar09 Jun09 Sep09 Dec09 Mar10 Jun10 Sep10 Dec10 Mar11 Jun11 Sep11 Dec11 Mar12 Jun12 Sep12 Dec12 Mar13 Jun13 Sep13
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00

Competitive Comparison of Norse Energy ASA's Piotroski F-Score

For the Oil & Gas E&P subindustry, Norse Energy ASA's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Norse Energy ASA's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, Norse Energy ASA's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Norse Energy ASA's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep13) TTM:Last Year (Sep12) TTM:
Net Income was -4.281 + -43.123 + -78.89 + -56.792 = kr-183.09 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -12.292 + -2.023 + -17.722 + -14.42 = kr-46.46 Mil.
Revenue was 1.391 + 0.22 + 0.153 + 0.119 = kr1.88 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1.307 + 0.064 + 0.065 + 0.048 = kr1.48 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep12)
to the end of this year (Sep13) was
(64.501 + 51.85 + 48.401 + 59.352 + 1.283) / 5 = kr45.0774 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep12) was kr64.50 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr30.70 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr1.28 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr61.43 Mil.
Net Income was -236.443 + -10.416 + -45.567 + -10.005 = kr-302.43 Mil.

Revenue was 55.018 + 0.228 + 0.523 + 0.149 = kr55.92 Mil.
Gross Profit was 54.016 + 0.074 + 0.385 + -0.029 = kr54.45 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep11)
to the end of last year (Sep12) was
(632.621 + 426.865 + 323.113 + 67.49 + 64.501) / 5 = kr302.918 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep11) was kr632.62 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr115.54 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr16.95 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr31.50 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Norse Energy ASA's current Net Income (TTM) was -183.09. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Norse Energy ASA's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -46.46. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep12)
=-183.086/64.501
=-2.83849863

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep11)
=-302.431/632.621
=-0.47806032

Norse Energy ASA's return on assets of this year was -2.83849863. Norse Energy ASA's return on assets of last year was -0.47806032. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Norse Energy ASA's current Net Income (TTM) was -183.09. Norse Energy ASA's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -46.46. ==> -46.46 > -183.09 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep13)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep12 to Sep13
=30.702/45.0774
=0.68109518

Gearing (Last Year: Sep12)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep11 to Sep12
=115.544/302.918
=0.38143656

Norse Energy ASA's gearing of this year was 0.68109518. Norse Energy ASA's gearing of last year was 0.38143656. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep13)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1.277/61.428
=0.02078857

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep12)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=16.947/31.503
=0.53794877

Norse Energy ASA's current ratio of this year was 0.02078857. Norse Energy ASA's current ratio of last year was 0.53794877. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Norse Energy ASA's number of shares in issue this year was 0. Norse Energy ASA's number of shares in issue last year was 0. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1.484/1.883
=0.78810409

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=54.446/55.918
=0.97367574

Norse Energy ASA's gross margin of this year was 0.78810409. Norse Energy ASA's gross margin of last year was 0.97367574. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep12)
=1.883/64.501
=0.02919335

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep11)
=55.918/632.621
=0.088391

Norse Energy ASA's asset turnover of this year was 0.02919335. Norse Energy ASA's asset turnover of last year was 0.088391. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+1+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Norse Energy ASA has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Norse Energy ASA  (OSL:NEC) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Norse Energy ASA Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Norse Energy ASA's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Norse Energy ASA (OSL:NEC) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Munkedamsveien 35, 3rd floor, P.O. Box 1903, Oslo, NOR, 0250
Norse Energy Corp ASA and its subsidiaries are engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties in the US.

Norse Energy ASA (OSL:NEC) Headlines

No Headlines