CodeMill AB (OSTO:CDMIL) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jul. 02, 2026) — 29% Below Median


OSTO:CDMIL CodeMill AB OSTO:CDMIL
73 GF Score
Price kr14.85
GF Value kr12.67
Valuation Modestly Overvalued
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is CodeMill AB Piotroski F-Score?

CodeMill AB OSTO:CDMIL -2.94% 73 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 02, 2026, which is 29% below its 10-year median of 7.00. GuruFocus rates OSTO:CDMIL with a GF Score™ of 73/100 and a GF Value™ of kr12.67 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,742 Software companies, CodeMill AB ranks better than 59.63% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

CodeMill AB has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for CodeMill AB's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

OSTO:CDMIL' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 7   Max: 9
Current: 5

During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of CodeMill AB was 9. The lowest was 3. And the median was 7.

CodeMill AB  (OSTO:CDMIL) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


CodeMill AB Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


CodeMill AB Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for CodeMill AB's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

CodeMill AB Piotroski F-Score Chart

CodeMill AB Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 3.00 6.00 7.00 9.00 5.00

CodeMill AB Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 6.00 7.00 5.00 5.00

OSTO:CDMIL vs UBER, SHOP, CRM: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Application subindustry, CodeMill AB's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


CodeMill AB Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, CodeMill AB's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where CodeMill AB's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


OSTO:CDMIL
73GF Score
CodeMill AB OSTO:CDMIL
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -1.682 + 0.508 + -0.325 + 1.543 = kr0.04 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 2.888 + 2.633 + 4.399 + 7.021 = kr16.94 Mil.
Revenue was 17.244 + 15.185 + 15.683 + 15.818 = kr63.93 Mil.
Gross Profit was 7.723 + 7.538 + 7.12 + 7.15 = kr29.53 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(85.539 + 74.7 + 72.322 + 79.413 + 79.255) / 5 = kr78.2458 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was kr85.54 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr45.67 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr27.92 Mil.
Net Income was 2.608 + 2.214 + 2.482 + 1.457 = kr8.76 Mil.

Revenue was 25.055 + 21.226 + 22.901 + 19.072 = kr88.25 Mil.
Gross Profit was 10.353 + 9.608 + 10.183 + 10.522 = kr40.67 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(89.138 + 85.816 + 84.063 + 91.694 + 85.539) / 5 = kr87.25 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was kr89.14 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr0.26 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr47.44 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr26.91 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

CodeMill AB's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.04. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

CodeMill AB's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 16.94. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=0.044/85.539
=0.00051439

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=8.761/89.138
=0.0982858

CodeMill AB's return on assets of this year was 0.00051439. CodeMill AB's return on assets of last year was 0.0982858. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

CodeMill AB's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.04. CodeMill AB's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 16.94. ==> 16.94 > 0.04 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0/78.2458
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0.263/87.25
=0.00301433

CodeMill AB's gearing of this year was 0. CodeMill AB's gearing of last year was 0.00301433. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=45.666/27.923
=1.63542599

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=47.444/26.913
=1.76286553

CodeMill AB's current ratio of this year was 1.63542599. CodeMill AB's current ratio of last year was 1.76286553. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

CodeMill AB's number of shares in issue this year was 14.135. CodeMill AB's number of shares in issue last year was 13.655. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=29.531/63.93
=0.46192711

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=40.666/88.254
=0.46078365

CodeMill AB's gross margin of this year was 0.46192711. CodeMill AB's gross margin of last year was 0.46078365. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=63.93/85.539
=0.74737839

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=88.254/89.138
=0.99008279

CodeMill AB's asset turnover of this year was 0.74737839. CodeMill AB's asset turnover of last year was 0.99008279. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+0+1+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

CodeMill AB has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
CodeMill AB (OSTO:CDMIL) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jul. 02, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on CodeMill AB and its competitors. This is 29% below median its historical median of 7.00. Over the past decade, CodeMill AB's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, CodeMill AB ranks #1107 out of 2742 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 40.4%.
Is CodeMill AB's Piotroski F-Score too high?
CodeMill AB's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 29% below median its 10-year median of 7.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 9.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. CodeMill AB's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, CodeMill AB ranks #1107 out of 2742 companies in the Software industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, CodeMill AB has a GF Score™ of 73/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does CodeMill AB's Piotroski F-Score compare to UBER and SHOP?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, CodeMill AB ranks #1107 out of 2742 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts CodeMill AB in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. CodeMill AB's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, CodeMill AB's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 7.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, CodeMill AB has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,742 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. CodeMill AB's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on CodeMill AB and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. CodeMill AB's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 29% below median its own 10-year median of 7.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is CodeMill AB stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, CodeMill AB (OSTO:CDMIL) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is kr12.67, compared to a current price of kr14.85 — trading 17.2% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 29% below median its 10-year median of 7.00 and 0% at the Software industry median of 5.00. CodeMill AB's overall GF Score™ is 73/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For CodeMill AB (OSTO:CDMIL), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 02, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is CodeMill AB (OSTO:CDMIL) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, CodeMill AB stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of kr14.85 is trading 17.2% above its estimated GF Value™ of kr12.67. GuruFocus considers CodeMill AB to be Modestly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for OSTO:CDMIL:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (29% below median its 10-year median of 7.00)
  • GF Value™: kr12.67 vs. price of kr14.85 (17.2% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 73/100 with 4 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Software median (#1107 of 2742)

No single metric tells the full story. See the OSTO:CDMIL stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


CodeMill AB Business Description

Address Sodra Ersmarksgatan 7, Umea, SWE, 903 36
CodeMill AB is a technology company that offers software development and technical services for video and media companies. The company's products include Accurate Player SDK, Accurate Video and Cantemo, as well as the product service, Digital Service, enable the streamlining of video and film production and distribution, from editing to archiving. Codemill has framework agreements with some of the world's key media companies such as Amazon Studios.
73GF Score

Get the complete analysis for OSTO:CDMIL

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

kr14.85
Price
kr12.67
GF Value