Meta Platforms (PFTS:META) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — Near Median


What is Meta Platforms Piotroski F-Score?

Meta Platforms PFTS:META 96 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates PFTS:META with a GF Score™ of 96/100. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 550 Interactive Media companies, Meta Platforms ranks better than 78.73% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Meta Platforms has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Meta Platforms's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

PFTS:META' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Meta Platforms was 9. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.

Meta Platforms  (PFTS:META) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Meta Platforms Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Meta Platforms Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Meta Platforms's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Meta Platforms Piotroski F-Score Chart

Meta Platforms Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 4.00 8.00 7.00 6.00

Meta Platforms Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00

PFTS:META vs SPOT, NBIS, BIDU: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Internet Content & Information subindustry, Meta Platforms's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Meta Platforms Piotroski F-Score vs Interactive Media Industry

For the Interactive Media industry and Communication Services sector, Meta Platforms's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Meta Platforms's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 823571.66 + 121669.609 + 1022581.641 + 1202458.639 = ₴3,170,281.55 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 1148023.952 + 1347348.325 + 1626483.291 + 1447369.816 = ₴5,569,225.38 Mil.
Revenue was 2134091.237 + 2301437.477 + 2689980.774 + 2529102.021 = ₴9,654,611.51 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1752734.037 + 1887967.405 + 2200158.418 + 2070179.884 = ₴7,911,039.74 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(12585236.714 + 13237869.085 + 13646578.367 + 16439140.679 + 17751905.911) / 5 = ₴14732146.1512 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was ₴12,585,236.71 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₴3,788,645.22 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₴4,929,887.29 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₴2,099,822.54 Mil.
Net Income was 604754.998 + 704596.837 + 935899.343 + 747533.768 = ₴2,992,784.95 Mil.

Revenue was 1754800.04 + 1822978.138 + 2173120.727 + 1900453.249 = ₴7,651,352.15 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1426575.047 + 1491743.967 + 1776133.766 + 1560371.196 = ₴6,254,823.98 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(10008616.625 + 10340704.145 + 11516080.179 + 12398443.098 + 12585236.714) / 5 = ₴11369816.1522 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was ₴10,008,616.63 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₴2,135,303.89 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₴4,052,374.99 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₴1,522,105.23 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Meta Platforms's current Net Income (TTM) was 3,170,281.55. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Meta Platforms's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 5,569,225.38. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=3170281.549/12585236.714
=0.2519048

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=2992784.946/10008616.625
=0.29902084

Meta Platforms's return on assets of this year was 0.2519048. Meta Platforms's return on assets of last year was 0.29902084. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Meta Platforms's current Net Income (TTM) was 3,170,281.55. Meta Platforms's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 5,569,225.38. ==> 5,569,225.38 > 3,170,281.55 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=3788645.22/14732146.1512
=0.25716859

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=2135303.891/11369816.1522
=0.18780461

Meta Platforms's gearing of this year was 0.25716859. Meta Platforms's gearing of last year was 0.18780461. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4929887.292/2099822.535
=2.34776378

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4052374.99/1522105.228
=2.66234878

Meta Platforms's current ratio of this year was 2.34776378. Meta Platforms's current ratio of last year was 2.66234878. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Meta Platforms's number of shares in issue this year was 2564. Meta Platforms's number of shares in issue last year was 2590. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=7911039.744/9654611.509
=0.81940529

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=6254823.976/7651352.154
=0.81747956

Meta Platforms's gross margin of this year was 0.81940529. Meta Platforms's gross margin of last year was 0.81747956. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=9654611.509/12585236.714
=0.76713786

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=7651352.154/10008616.625
=0.76447649

Meta Platforms's asset turnover of this year was 0.76713786. Meta Platforms's asset turnover of last year was 0.76447649. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+0+0+1+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Meta Platforms has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
Meta Platforms (PFTS:META) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Meta Platforms and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Meta Platforms' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Meta Platforms ranks #117 out of 550 companies in the Interactive Media industry, placing it in the top 21.3%.
Is Meta Platforms' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Meta Platforms' current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is near median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 9.00. The Interactive Media industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Meta Platforms' value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Meta Platforms ranks #117 out of 550 companies in the Interactive Media industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Meta Platforms has a GF Score™ of 96/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Meta Platforms' Piotroski F-Score compare to SPOT and NBIS?
According to the Interactive Media industry distribution chart, Meta Platforms ranks #117 out of 550 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Meta Platforms in the top 21% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Meta Platforms' value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, Meta Platforms' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Meta Platforms has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Interactive Media company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Interactive Media companies is 5.00, based on 550 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Meta Platforms's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Meta Platforms and its competitors. For the Interactive Media industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Meta Platforms's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is near median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Meta Platforms stock overvalued right now?
Meta Platforms (PFTS:META) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 6. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is near median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 20% above the Interactive Media industry median of 5.00. Meta Platforms' overall GF Score™ is 96/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Meta Platforms (PFTS:META), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Meta Platforms Business Description

Address 1 Meta Way, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 94025
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.