REI (Ring Energy) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — 40% Below Median


REI Ring Energy Inc REI
64 GF Score
Price $1.08
GF Value $1.15
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Ring Energy Piotroski F-Score?

Ring Energy REI +0.93% 64 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 40% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates REI with a GF Score™ of 64/100 and a GF Value™ of $1.15 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 975 Oil & Gas companies, Ring Energy ranks worse than 78.97% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ring Energy has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ring Energy's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

REI' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Ring Energy was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

Ring Energy  (AMEX:REI) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Ring Energy Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Ring Energy Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Ring Energy's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Ring Energy Piotroski F-Score Chart

Ring Energy Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 7.00 5.00 4.00 3.00

Ring Energy Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

REI vs FTW, SHASF, GTE: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Oil & Gas E&P subindustry, Ring Energy's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Ring Energy Piotroski F-Score vs Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, Ring Energy's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Ring Energy's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


REI
64GF Score
Ring Energy Inc REI
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 20.635 + -51.632 + -12.845 + -220.591 = $-264.4 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 33.297 + 44.492 + 44.689 + 25.895 = $148.4 Mil.
Revenue was 82.603 + 78.601 + 66.883 + 73.672 = $301.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 30.997 + 26.438 + 19.168 + 28.095 = $104.7 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(1505.61 + 1516.331 + 1434.673 + 1411.899 + 1254.715) / 5 = $1424.6456 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $1,505.6 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $427.2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $59.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $147.9 Mil.
Net Income was 22.419 + 33.878 + 5.658 + 9.111 = $71.1 Mil.

Revenue was 99.139 + 89.244 + 83.441 + 79.091 = $350.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was 49.884 + 36.621 + 31.981 + 31.302 = $149.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(1384.684 + 1389.754 + 1399.765 + 1408.099 + 1505.61) / 5 = $1417.5824 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $1,384.7 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $461.9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $48.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $103.7 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ring Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was -264.4. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ring Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 148.4. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-264.433/1505.61
=-0.1756318

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=71.066/1384.684
=0.0513229

Ring Energy's return on assets of this year was -0.1756318. Ring Energy's return on assets of last year was 0.0513229. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Ring Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was -264.4. Ring Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 148.4. ==> 148.4 > -264.4 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=427.182/1424.6456
=0.29985142

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=461.943/1417.5824
=0.32586677

Ring Energy's gearing of this year was 0.29985142. Ring Energy's gearing of last year was 0.32586677. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=59.265/147.858
=0.40082376

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=48.67/103.746
=0.46912652

Ring Energy's current ratio of this year was 0.40082376. Ring Energy's current ratio of last year was 0.46912652. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Ring Energy's number of shares in issue this year was 208.559. Ring Energy's number of shares in issue last year was 201.073. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=104.698/301.759
=0.346959

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=149.788/350.915
=0.42684981

Ring Energy's gross margin of this year was 0.346959. Ring Energy's gross margin of last year was 0.42684981. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=301.759/1505.61
=0.20042308

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=350.915/1384.684
=0.25342605

Ring Energy's asset turnover of this year was 0.20042308. Ring Energy's asset turnover of last year was 0.25342605. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ring Energy has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Ring Energy (REI) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Ring Energy and its competitors. This is 40% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Ring Energy's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Ring Energy ranks #770 out of 975 companies in the Oil & Gas industry, placing it in the top 79%.
Is Ring Energy's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Ring Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 8.00. The Oil & Gas industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Ring Energy's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Ring Energy ranks #770 out of 975 companies in the Oil & Gas industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Ring Energy has a GF Score™ of 64/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Ring Energy's Piotroski F-Score compare to FTW and SHASF?
According to the Oil & Gas industry distribution chart, Ring Energy ranks #770 out of 975 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Ring Energy in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Ring Energy's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Ring Energy's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Ring Energy has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Oil & Gas company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Oil & Gas companies is 5.00, based on 975 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Ring Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Ring Energy and its competitors. For the Oil & Gas industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Ring Energy's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Ring Energy stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Ring Energy (REI) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is $1.15, compared to a current price of $1.08 — trading 6.1% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 40% below the Oil & Gas industry median of 5.00. Ring Energy's overall GF Score™ is 64/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Ring Energy (REI), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Ring Energy (REI) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Ring Energy stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $1.08 is trading 6.1% below its estimated GF Value™ of $1.15. GuruFocus considers Ring Energy to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for REI:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 3 (40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: $1.15 vs. price of $1.08 (6.1% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 64/100 with 4 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% below the Oil & Gas median (#770 of 975)

No single metric tells the full story. See the REI stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Ring Energy Business Description

Industry EnergyOil & Gas
Other Exchanges KWE1:Germany
Address 1725 Hughes Landing Boulevard, Suite 900, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 77380
Ring Energy Inc is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company based in the United States. It is engaged in oil and natural gas development, production, acquisition, and exploration activities, currently focused on the Permian Basin of Texas. The company's drilling operations target the oil and liquids-rich producing formations in the Northwest Shelf and the Central Basin Platform, in the Permian Basin in Texas.
64GF Score

Get the complete analysis for REI

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$1.08
Price
$1.15
GF Value