RNGE (Range Impact) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — 50% Above Median


RNGE Range Impact Inc RNGE
29 GF Score
Price $0.46
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Range Impact Piotroski F-Score?

Range Impact RNGE -6.49% 29 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 50% above its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates RNGE with a GF Score™ of 29/100. The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,511 Metals & Mining companies, Range Impact ranks better than 91.4% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Range Impact has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Range Impact's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

RNGE' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 6
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Range Impact was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Range Impact  (OTCPK:RNGE) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Range Impact Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Range Impact Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Range Impact's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Range Impact Piotroski F-Score Chart

Range Impact Annual Data
Trend Mar16 Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 6.00 3.00 6.00

Range Impact Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 4.00 6.00 6.00

RNGE vs FNUC, OMEX, WWR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Range Impact's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Range Impact Piotroski F-Score vs Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Range Impact's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Range Impact's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


RNGE
29GF Score
Range Impact Inc RNGE
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.798 + -0.633 + 15.5 + -1.834 = $12.24 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.542 + -0.095 + 0.104 + -0.982 = $-0.43 Mil.
Revenue was 1.391 + 0.779 + 0.845 + 0.915 = $3.93 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.508 + -0.192 + 2.03 + 0.07 = $2.42 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(54.448 + 58.217 + 57.555 + 123.237 + 121.975) / 5 = $83.0864 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $54.45 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1.30 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2.30 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $4.01 Mil.
Net Income was -1.226 + -4.92 + -2.438 + 5.1 = $-3.48 Mil.

Revenue was 2.35 + 2.172 + -8.431 + 0 = $-3.91 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.149 + -0.393 + 0.048 + -0.151 = $-0.65 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(20.814 + 19.442 + 10.442 + 6.193 + 54.448) / 5 = $22.2678 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $20.81 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1.76 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1.21 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $3.07 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Range Impact's current Net Income (TTM) was 12.24. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Range Impact's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.43. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=12.235/54.448
=0.22470981

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-3.484/20.814
=-0.16738734

Range Impact's return on assets of this year was 0.22470981. Range Impact's return on assets of last year was -0.16738734. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Range Impact's current Net Income (TTM) was 12.24. Range Impact's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.43. ==> -0.43 <= 12.24 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=1.3/83.0864
=0.01564636

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=1.763/22.2678
=0.07917262

Range Impact's gearing of this year was 0.01564636. Range Impact's gearing of last year was 0.07917262. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.296/4.009
=0.5727114

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1.208/3.068
=0.39374185

Range Impact's current ratio of this year was 0.5727114. Range Impact's current ratio of last year was 0.39374185. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Range Impact's number of shares in issue this year was 112.501. Range Impact's number of shares in issue last year was 104.733. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2.416/3.93
=0.61475827

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-0.645/-3.909
=0.16500384

Range Impact's gross margin of this year was 0.61475827. Range Impact's gross margin of last year was 0.16500384. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=3.93/54.448
=0.07217896

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=-3.909/20.814
=-0.18780628

Range Impact's asset turnover of this year was 0.07217896. Range Impact's asset turnover of last year was -0.18780628. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+1+1+0+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Range Impact has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
Range Impact (RNGE) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Range Impact and its competitors. This is 50% above median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Range Impact's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Range Impact ranks #216 out of 2511 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 8.6%.
Is Range Impact's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Range Impact's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 50% above median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 6.00. The Metals & Mining industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Range Impact's value of 6 is 100% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Range Impact ranks #216 out of 2511 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Range Impact has a GF Score™ of 29/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Range Impact's Piotroski F-Score compare to FNUC and OMEX?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Range Impact ranks #216 out of 2511 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Range Impact in the top 9% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Range Impact's value of 6 is 100% above this benchmark. Historically, Range Impact's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 3.00, Range Impact has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Metals & Mining companies is 3.00, based on 2,511 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Range Impact's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 100% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Range Impact and its competitors. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Range Impact's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 50% above median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Range Impact stock overvalued right now?
Range Impact (RNGE) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 6. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 50% above median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 100% above the Metals & Mining industry median of 3.00. Range Impact's overall GF Score™ is 29/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Range Impact (RNGE), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Range Impact Business Description

Address 200 Park Avenue, Suite 400, Cleveland, OH, USA, 44122
Range Impact Inc is dedicated to improving the health and wellness of people and the planet through a novel approach to impact investing. The company owns and operates several complementary operating businesses focused on developing long-term solutions to environmental, social, and health challenges, with a particular focus on acquiring, reclaiming and repurposing mine sites and other undervalued land in economically disadvantaged communities throughout Appalachia. It takes an opportunistic approach to impact investing by leveraging its competitive advantages and looking at solving old problems in new ways.
29GF Score

Get the complete analysis for RNGE

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.46
Price