China International Holdings (SGX:BEH) Piotroski F-Score: N/A (As of Aug. 15, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is China International Holdings Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China International Holdings has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for China International Holdings's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of China International Holdings was 8. The lowest was 1. And the median was 5.

China International Holdings  (SGX:BEH) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


China International Holdings Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


China International Holdings Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for China International Holdings's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

China International Holdings Piotroski F-Score Chart

China International Holdings Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 2.00 3.00 5.00 5.00

China International Holdings Quarterly Data
Sep19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A N/A N/A 5.00 N/A

SGX:BEH vs AWK, WTRG, AWR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Utilities - Regulated Water subindustry, China International Holdings's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


China International Holdings Piotroski F-Score vs Utilities - Regulated Industry

For the Utilities - Regulated industry and Utilities sector, China International Holdings's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where China International Holdings's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 0.085 + -0.118 + -0.534 + -0.163 = S$-0.73 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -1.146 + -0.494 + 0.799 + -0.15 = S$-0.99 Mil.
Revenue was 4.584 + 4.124 + 11.517 + 3.528 = S$23.75 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.104 + 1.318 + 5.351 + 1.145 = S$9.92 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(109.59 + 105.573 + 105.989 + 103.191 + 104.345) / 5 = S$105.7376 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was S$109.59 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was S$8.83 Mil.
Total Current Assets was S$58.81 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was S$32.19 Mil.
Net Income was -20.287 + 0.058 + -0.117 + -0.102 = S$-20.45 Mil.

Revenue was 4.712 + 4.259 + 8.052 + 3.87 = S$20.89 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1.729 + 1.985 + 2.585 + 1.624 = S$7.92 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(0 + 0 + 119.617 + 112.379 + 109.59) / 5 = S$113.862 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was S$0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was S$13.27 Mil.
Total Current Assets was S$57.68 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was S$33.07 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China International Holdings's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.73. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China International Holdings's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.99. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-0.73/109.59
=-0.00666119

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-20.448/0
=

China International Holdings's return on assets of this year was -0.00666119. China International Holdings's return on assets of last year was . ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

China International Holdings's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.73. China International Holdings's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.99. ==> -0.99 <= -0.73 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=8.829/105.7376
=0.08349915

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=13.274/113.862
=0.11657972

China International Holdings's gearing of this year was 0.08349915. China International Holdings's gearing of last year was 0.11657972. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=58.805/32.186
=1.8270366

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=57.68/33.072
=1.74407354

China International Holdings's current ratio of this year was 1.8270366. China International Holdings's current ratio of last year was 1.74407354. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

China International Holdings's number of shares in issue this year was 78.396. China International Holdings's number of shares in issue last year was 78.116. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=9.918/23.753
=0.41754726

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=7.923/20.893
=0.37921792

China International Holdings's gross margin of this year was 0.41754726. China International Holdings's gross margin of last year was 0.37921792. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=23.753/109.59
=0.21674423

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=20.893/0
=

China International Holdings's asset turnover of this year was 0.21674423. China International Holdings's asset turnover of last year was . ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+0+1+1+0+1+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China International Holdings has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.


China International Holdings Business Description

Address 317-319 Des Voeux Road Central, Room 1306, 13th Floor, Kai Tak Commercial Building, Hong Kong, HKG
China International Holdings Ltd is an integrated water supply company, wastewater treatment as well as managing a real estate portfolio. It is involved in the processing of raw water and reclaimed water and the distribution of treated water for industrial and domestic. Its operating segment includes Water supply services; Land development and others. The company generates maximum revenue from the Water supply services segment. Its Water supply services segment is engaged in the construction of water pipelines and the supply of gray water wastewater treatment service. Company operates in PRC and Hong Kong, majority of revenue from PRC.