XMH HoldingsSGX:BQF -4.64%56 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jul. 07, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates SGX:BQF with a GF Score™ of 56/100 and a GF Value™ of S$0.85 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,977 Industrial Products companies, XMH Holdings ranks better than 75.55% on this metric.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
XMH Holdings has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
The historical rank and industry rank for XMH Holdings's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
SGX:BQF'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3 Med: 6 Max: 8
Current: 6
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of XMH Holdings was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 6.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
XMH Holdings Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
XMH Holdings Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for XMH Holdings's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
SGX:BQF vs GEV, ETN, PH: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Specialty Industrial Machinery subindustry, XMH Holdings's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
XMH Holdings Piotroski F-Score vs Industrial Products Industry
For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, XMH Holdings's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where XMH Holdings's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
XMH Holdings's current Net Income (TTM) was 31.6.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
XMH Holdings's return on assets of this year was 0.15518276. XMH Holdings's return on assets of last year was 0.17485213.
==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
XMH Holdings's gearing of this year was 0.00060287. XMH Holdings's gearing of last year was 0.01400454.
==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
XMH Holdings's current ratio of this year was 1.82011848. XMH Holdings's current ratio of last year was 1.27046111.
==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
XMH Holdings's number of shares in issue this year was 109.628. XMH Holdings's number of shares in issue last year was 109.665.
==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
XMH Holdings's gross margin of this year was 0.33992577. XMH Holdings's gross margin of last year was 0.3260772.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
XMH Holdings's asset turnover of this year was 0.91139016. XMH Holdings's asset turnover of last year was 1.14411386.
==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
=
6
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
XMH Holdings has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
XMH Holdings (SGX:BQF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jul. 07, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on XMH Holdings and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, XMH Holdings' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, XMH Holdings ranks #728 out of 2977 companies in the Industrial Products industry, placing it in the top 24.5%.
Is XMH Holdings' Piotroski F-Score too high?
XMH Holdings' current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is near median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Industrial Products industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. XMH Holdings' value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, XMH Holdings ranks #728 out of 2977 companies in the Industrial Products industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, XMH Holdings has a GF Score™ of 56/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does XMH Holdings' Piotroski F-Score compare to GEV and ETN?
According to the Industrial Products industry distribution chart, XMH Holdings ranks #728 out of 2977 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places XMH Holdings in the top 25% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. XMH Holdings' value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, XMH Holdings' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, XMH Holdings has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Industrial Products company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Industrial Products companies is 5.00, based on 2,977 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. XMH Holdings's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on XMH Holdings and its competitors. For the Industrial Products industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. XMH Holdings's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is near median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is XMH Holdings stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, XMH Holdings (SGX:BQF) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is S$0.85, compared to a current price of S$2.26 — trading 165.9% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is near median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 20% above the Industrial Products industry median of 5.00. XMH Holdings' overall GF Score™ is 56/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For XMH Holdings (SGX:BQF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jul. 07, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is XMH Holdings (SGX:BQF) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, XMH Holdings stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of S$2.26 is trading 165.9% above its estimated GF Value™ of S$0.85.
GuruFocus considers XMH Holdings to be Significantly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for SGX:BQF:
Piotroski F-Score: 6 (near median its 10-year median of 6.00)
GF Value™: S$0.85 vs. price of S$2.26 (165.9% above fair value)
Industry Position: 20% above the Industrial Products median (#728 of 2977)
No single metric tells the full story. See the SGX:BQF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
XMH Holdings Ltd is an investment holding company. Along with its subsidiaries, the firm is predominantly engaged as a diesel engine, propulsion, and power generating solutions provider to customers in the marine and industrial sectors across Asia. Its reportable segments are; Distribution, After-sales, and Project. The maximum revenue is generated from its Distribution segment which comprises distribution of propulsion engines. The After-sales segment relates to after-sales services provided which includes services/jobs, sales of spare parts, and other trading; and the Project segment relates to manufacturing, sales, and commission of power generator sets and the manufacturing of marine equipment and related repair services. Geographically, it derives key revenue from Indonesia.
56GF Score
Get the complete analysis for SGX:BQF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
SGX:BQF has been successfully added to your 
