GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc (SHSE:688312) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology (SHSE:688312) Piotroski F-Score : 3 (As of May. 13, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2020. Start your Free Trial

What is Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SHSE:688312' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 8
Current: 3

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.


Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Piotroski F-Score Chart

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A 4.00 5.00 5.00 2.00

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Quarterly Data
Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 3.00

Competitive Comparison of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's Piotroski F-Score

For the Specialty Industrial Machinery subindustry, Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar24) TTM:Last Year (Mar23) TTM:
Net Income was 25.998 + 17.797 + 23.399 + 8.314 = ¥75.5 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -11.19 + 4.613 + -41.482 + 41.783 = ¥-6.3 Mil.
Revenue was 67.545 + 88.061 + 118.792 + 71.504 = ¥345.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was 43.489 + 47.006 + 65.657 + 40.804 = ¥197.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar23)
to the end of this year (Mar24) was
(1545.404 + 1495.727 + 1487.68 + 1496.448 + 1577.77) / 5 = ¥1520.6058 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar23) was ¥1,545.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥5.9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥1,227.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥227.3 Mil.
Net Income was 16.726 + 39.255 + 15.78 + 1.369 = ¥73.1 Mil.

Revenue was 63.166 + 110.448 + 79.309 + 52.515 = ¥305.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 37.303 + 68.145 + 39.914 + 30.245 = ¥175.6 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar22)
to the end of last year (Mar23) was
(1467.131 + 1428.409 + 1475.417 + 1496.023 + 1545.404) / 5 = ¥1482.4768 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar22) was ¥1,467.1 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥11.9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥1,295.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥194.3 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was 75.5. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -6.3. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=75.508/1545.404
=0.04885972

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar22)
=73.13/1467.131
=0.04984558

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's return on assets of this year was 0.04885972. Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's return on assets of last year was 0.04984558. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was 75.5. Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -6.3. ==> -6.3 <= 75.5 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=5.934/1520.6058
=0.00390239

Gearing (Last Year: Mar23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar22 to Mar23
=11.918/1482.4768
=0.00803925

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's gearing of this year was 0.00390239. Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's gearing of last year was 0.00803925. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1227.702/227.322
=5.40071792

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1295.679/194.277
=6.66923516

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's current ratio of this year was 5.40071792. Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's current ratio of last year was 6.66923516. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's number of shares in issue this year was 138.563. Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's number of shares in issue last year was 136.906. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=196.956/345.902
=0.56939827

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=175.607/305.438
=0.57493501

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's gross margin of this year was 0.56939827. Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's gross margin of last year was 0.57493501. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar23)
=345.902/1545.404
=0.22382626

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar22)
=305.438/1467.131
=0.20818727

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's asset turnover of this year was 0.22382626. Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's asset turnover of last year was 0.20818727. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+1+0+0+0+1
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology  (SHSE:688312) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Shenzhen Yanmade Technology's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Shenzhen Yanmade Technology (SHSE:688312) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
No. 9 Bangkai Road, Fengkai Street, 101, 2, 3, 4th Floor, 1st Floor, Building C, No. 2, Bangkai Technology City, Guangming New District, Guangdong Province, Shenzhen, CHN, 518052
Shenzhen Yanmade Technology Inc is engaged in design, production and sales of automated and intelligent test equipment. The cmpany's products include multiple test fields such as automatic test equipment, test fixtures, accessories, etc., and use mechanical automation solutions with independent intellectual property rights to realize flexible manufacturing and intelligent manufacturing platforms for customers.

Shenzhen Yanmade Technology (SHSE:688312) Headlines

No Headlines