Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Chalice MiningSTU:C8U -3.18%36 Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jul. 31, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 2.00. GuruFocus rates STU:C8U with a GF Score™ of 36/100. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 2,502 Metals & Mining companies, Chalice Mining ranks worse than 74.5% on this metric.
Warning Sign:
Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Chalice Mining has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
The historical rank and industry rank for Chalice Mining's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
STU:C8U'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1 Med: 2 Max: 5
Current: 2
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Chalice Mining was 5. The lowest was 1. And the median was 2.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Chalice Mining Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Chalice Mining Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Chalice Mining's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Chalice Mining's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Chalice Mining Piotroski F-Score vs Metals & Mining Industry
For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Chalice Mining's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Chalice Mining's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Chalice Mining's current Net Income (TTM) was -13.67.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Chalice Mining's return on assets of this year was -0.12982646. Chalice Mining's return on assets of last year was -0.19758663.
==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Chalice Mining's gearing of this year was 0.01036076. Chalice Mining's gearing of last year was 0.01008784.
==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Chalice Mining's current ratio of this year was 16.82281731. Chalice Mining's current ratio of last year was 19.9287917.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Chalice Mining's number of shares in issue this year was 380.338. Chalice Mining's number of shares in issue last year was 379.257.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Chalice Mining's gross margin of this year was . Chalice Mining's gross margin of last year was .
==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Chalice Mining's asset turnover of this year was 0. Chalice Mining's asset turnover of last year was 0.
==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
0
+
0
+
0
=
2
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Chalice Mining has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
Chalice Mining (STU:C8U) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Jul. 31, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Chalice Mining and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 2.00. Over the past decade, Chalice Mining's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 5.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Chalice Mining ranks #1864 out of 2502 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 74.5%.
Is Chalice Mining's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Chalice Mining's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is near median its 10-year median of 2.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 5.00. The Metals & Mining industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Chalice Mining's value of 2 is 33.3% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Chalice Mining ranks #1864 out of 2502 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Chalice Mining has a GF Score™ of 36/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Chalice Mining's Piotroski F-Score compare to competitors?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Chalice Mining ranks #1864 out of 2502 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Chalice Mining in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Chalice Mining's value of 2 is 33.3% below this benchmark. Historically, Chalice Mining's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 2.00 vs. the industry median of 3.00, Chalice Mining has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Metals & Mining companies is 3.00, based on 2,502 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Chalice Mining's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 33.3% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Chalice Mining and its competitors. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Chalice Mining's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is near median its own 10-year median of 2.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Chalice Mining stock overvalued right now?
Chalice Mining (STU:C8U) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 2. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is near median its 10-year median of 2.00 and 33.3% below the Metals & Mining industry median of 3.00. Chalice Mining's overall GF Score™ is 36/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Chalice Mining (STU:C8U), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jul. 31, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Chalice Mining Ltd is engaged in the exploration of precious and base metal properties. The project portfolio includes Julimar Nickel-Copper-PGE Project, Pyramid Hill Gold Project, Hawkstone Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Project, South West Nickel-Copper-PGE Project, Barrabarra Nickel-Copper-PGE Project, Auralia Nickel-Copper-Gold Project, Warrego North Project, Mt Jackson Gold Project, Nulla South & Gibb Rock Gold Project, and Viking Gold Project. It operates in one reportable segment being mineral exploration and evaluation.
36GF Score
Get the complete analysis for STU:C8U
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
STU:C8U has been successfully added to your 
