CMS Energy (STU:CSG) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — 20% Above Median


STU:CSG CMS Energy Corp STU:CSG
76 GF Score
Price €67.90
GF Value €66.98
! 11 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is CMS Energy Piotroski F-Score?

CMS Energy STU:CSG +0.92% 76 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is 20% above its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates STU:CSG with a GF Score™ of 76/100 and a GF Value™ of €66.98. The stock has 11 warning signs investors should review. Among 491 Utilities - Regulated companies, CMS Energy ranks better than 69.25% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

CMS Energy has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for CMS Energy's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

STU:CSG' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of CMS Energy was 7. The lowest was 4. And the median was 5.

CMS Energy  (STU:CSG) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


CMS Energy Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


CMS Energy Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for CMS Energy's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

CMS Energy Piotroski F-Score Chart

CMS Energy Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 5.00

CMS Energy Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00

STU:CSG vs ES, EVRG, LNT: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Utilities - Regulated Electric subindustry, CMS Energy's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


CMS Energy Piotroski F-Score vs Utilities - Regulated Industry

For the Utilities - Regulated industry and Utilities sector, CMS Energy's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where CMS Energy's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


STU:CSG
76GF Score
CMS Energy Corp STU:CSG
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 174.267 + 236.004 + 246.806 + 294.1 = €951 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 332.061 + 292.236 + 408.212 + 636.64 = €1,669 Mil.
Revenue was 1593.546 + 1721.892 + 1906.982 + 2361.45 = €7,584 Mil.
Gross Profit was 619.038 + 746.352 + 778.848 + 929.875 = €3,074 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(33572.875 + 32685.033 + 32382.816 + 34109.614 + 34846.525) / 5 = €33519.3726 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was €33,573 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €15,326 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €2,617 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €3,107 Mil.
Net Income was 183.942 + 227.953 + 253.075 + 281.2 = €946 Mil.

Revenue was 1492.903 + 1570.443 + 1899.495 + 2263.475 = €7,226 Mil.
Gross Profit was 611.282 + 665.839 + 837.535 + 965.7 = €3,080 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(31188.92 + 31915.795 + 31370.117 + 34303.6 + 33572.875) / 5 = €32470.2614 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was €31,189 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €15,040 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €2,573 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €2,430 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

CMS Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was 951. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

CMS Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 1,669. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=951.177/33572.875
=0.02833171

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=946.17/31188.92
=0.03033673

CMS Energy's return on assets of this year was 0.02833171. CMS Energy's return on assets of last year was 0.03033673. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

CMS Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was 951. CMS Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 1,669. ==> 1,669 > 951 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=15326.07/33519.3726
=0.45723022

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=15039.575/32470.2614
=0.46317998

CMS Energy's gearing of this year was 0.45723022. CMS Energy's gearing of last year was 0.46317998. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2616.625/3107.08
=0.84214922

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2573.35/2429.975
=1.05900266

CMS Energy's current ratio of this year was 0.84214922. CMS Energy's current ratio of last year was 1.05900266. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

CMS Energy's number of shares in issue this year was 307.1. CMS Energy's number of shares in issue last year was 299.1. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3074.113/7583.87
=0.40534885

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3080.356/7226.316
=0.42626921

CMS Energy's gross margin of this year was 0.40534885. CMS Energy's gross margin of last year was 0.42626921. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=7583.87/33572.875
=0.22589278

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=7226.316/31188.92
=0.23169497

CMS Energy's asset turnover of this year was 0.22589278. CMS Energy's asset turnover of last year was 0.23169497. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

CMS Energy has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
CMS Energy (STU:CSG) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on CMS Energy and its competitors. This is 20% above median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, CMS Energy's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, CMS Energy ranks #151 out of 491 companies in the Utilities - Regulated industry, placing it in the top 30.8%.
Is CMS Energy's Piotroski F-Score too high?
CMS Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 7.00. The Utilities - Regulated industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. CMS Energy's value of 6 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, CMS Energy ranks #151 out of 491 companies in the Utilities - Regulated industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, CMS Energy has a GF Score™ of 76/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does CMS Energy's Piotroski F-Score compare to ES and EVRG?
According to the Utilities - Regulated industry distribution chart, CMS Energy ranks #151 out of 491 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts CMS Energy in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. CMS Energy's value of 6 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, CMS Energy's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 6.00, CMS Energy has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Utilities - Regulated company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Utilities - Regulated companies is 6.00, based on 491 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. CMS Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on CMS Energy and its competitors. For the Utilities - Regulated industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. CMS Energy's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is CMS Energy stock overvalued right now?
CMS Energy (STU:CSG) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 6. The stock's GF Value™ is €66.98, compared to a current price of €67.90 — trading 1.4% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Utilities - Regulated industry median of 6.00. CMS Energy's overall GF Score™ is 76/100 with 11 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For CMS Energy (STU:CSG), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is CMS Energy (STU:CSG) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, CMS Energy stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of €67.90 is trading 1.4% above its estimated GF Value™ of €66.98.

Key valuation signals for STU:CSG:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 6 (20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: €66.98 vs. price of €67.90 (1.4% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 76/100 with 11 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Utilities - Regulated median (#151 of 491)

No single metric tells the full story. See the STU:CSG stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


CMS Energy Business Description

Address One Energy Plaza, Jackson, MI, USA, 49201
CMS Energy is an energy holding company with three principal businesses. Its regulated utility, Consumers Energy, provides regulated natural gas service to 1.8 million customers and electric service to 1.9 million customers in Michigan. NorthStar Clean Energy, formerly CMS Enterprises, is engaged in wholesale power generation, including contracted renewable energy. CMS sold EnerBank in October 2021.
76GF Score

Get the complete analysis for STU:CSG

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

€67.90
Price
€66.98
GF Value