Fraser and Neave (STU:FNV2) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 30, 2026) — 20% Above Median


STU:FNV2 Fraser and Neave Ltd STU:FNV2
77 GF Score
Price €0.94
GF Value €0.86
! 8 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Fraser and Neave Piotroski F-Score?

Fraser and Neave STU:FNV2 77 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 30, 2026, which is 20% above its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates STU:FNV2 with a GF Score™ of 77/100 and a GF Value™ of €0.86. The stock has 8 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,909 Consumer Packaged Goods companies, Fraser and Neave ranks better than 73.28% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Fraser and Neave has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Fraser and Neave's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

STU:FNV2' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Fraser and Neave was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Fraser and Neave  (STU:FNV2) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Fraser and Neave Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Fraser and Neave Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Fraser and Neave's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Fraser and Neave Piotroski F-Score Chart

Fraser and Neave Annual Data
Trend Sep16 Sep17 Sep18 Sep19 Sep20 Sep21 Sep22 Sep23 Sep24 Sep25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 4.00 7.00 7.00 6.00

Fraser and Neave Semi-Annual Data
Sep16 Mar17 Sep17 Mar18 Sep18 Mar19 Sep19 Mar20 Sep20 Mar21 Sep21 Mar22 Sep22 Mar23 Sep23 Mar24 Sep24 Mar25 Sep25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 7.00 0.00 6.00 0.00

STU:FNV2 vs KHC, GIS: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Packaged Foods subindustry, Fraser and Neave's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Fraser and Neave Piotroski F-Score vs Consumer Packaged Goods Industry

For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, Fraser and Neave's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Fraser and Neave's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


STU:FNV2
77GF Score
Fraser and Neave Ltd STU:FNV2
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep25) TTM:Last Year (Sep24) TTM:
Net Income was €94 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was €153 Mil.
Revenue was €1,540 Mil.
Gross Profit was €482 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep24)
to the end of this year (Sep25) was (3617.641 + 3338.53) / 2 = €3478.0855 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep24) was €3,618 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €509 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €765 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €572 Mil.
Net Income was €105 Mil.

Revenue was €1,503 Mil.
Gross Profit was €479 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep23)
to the end of last year (Sep24) was (3519.265 + 3617.641) / 2 = €3568.453 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep23) was €3,519 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €667 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €929 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €554 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Fraser and Neave's current Net Income (TTM) was 94. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Fraser and Neave's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 153. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep24)
=93.697/3617.641
=0.02590003

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep23)
=104.936/3519.265
=0.02981759

Fraser and Neave's return on assets of this year was 0.02590003. Fraser and Neave's return on assets of last year was 0.02981759. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Fraser and Neave's current Net Income (TTM) was 94. Fraser and Neave's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 153. ==> 153 > 94 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep24 to Sep25
=508.84/3478.0855
=0.14629888

Gearing (Last Year: Sep24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep23 to Sep24
=667.3/3568.453
=0.1869998

Fraser and Neave's gearing of this year was 0.14629888. Fraser and Neave's gearing of last year was 0.1869998. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=764.777/572.398
=1.33609307

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=929.031/553.592
=1.67818718

Fraser and Neave's current ratio of this year was 1.33609307. Fraser and Neave's current ratio of last year was 1.67818718. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Fraser and Neave's number of shares in issue this year was 1459.631. Fraser and Neave's number of shares in issue last year was 1460.213. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=482.442/1540.471
=0.31317824

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=478.944/1503.469
=0.31855928

Fraser and Neave's gross margin of this year was 0.31317824. Fraser and Neave's gross margin of last year was 0.31855928. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep24)
=1540.471/3617.641
=0.42582197

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep23)
=1503.469/3519.265
=0.42721108

Fraser and Neave's asset turnover of this year was 0.42582197. Fraser and Neave's asset turnover of last year was 0.42721108. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Fraser and Neave has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
Fraser and Neave (STU:FNV2) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 30, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Fraser and Neave and its competitors. This is 20% above median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Fraser and Neave's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Fraser and Neave ranks #510 out of 1909 companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, placing it in the top 26.7%.
Is Fraser and Neave's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Fraser and Neave's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 7.00. The Consumer Packaged Goods industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Fraser and Neave's value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Fraser and Neave ranks #510 out of 1909 companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Fraser and Neave has a GF Score™ of 77/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Fraser and Neave's Piotroski F-Score compare to KHC and GIS?
According to the Consumer Packaged Goods industry distribution chart, Fraser and Neave ranks #510 out of 1909 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Fraser and Neave in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Fraser and Neave's value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, Fraser and Neave's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Fraser and Neave has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Consumer Packaged Goods company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Consumer Packaged Goods companies is 5.00, based on 1,909 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Fraser and Neave's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Fraser and Neave and its competitors. For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Fraser and Neave's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Fraser and Neave stock overvalued right now?
Fraser and Neave (STU:FNV2) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 6. The stock's GF Value™ is €0.86, compared to a current price of €0.94 — trading 9.3% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% above the Consumer Packaged Goods industry median of 5.00. Fraser and Neave's overall GF Score™ is 77/100 with 8 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Fraser and Neave (STU:FNV2), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 30, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Fraser and Neave (STU:FNV2) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Fraser and Neave stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of €0.94 is trading 9.3% above its estimated GF Value™ of €0.86.

Key valuation signals for STU:FNV2:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 6 (20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: €0.86 vs. price of €0.94 (9.3% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 77/100 with 8 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% above the Consumer Packaged Goods median (#510 of 1909)

No single metric tells the full story. See the STU:FNV2 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Fraser and Neave Business Description

Other Exchanges FNEVF:USAF99:Singapore
Address 438 Alexandra Road, Number 20-00 Alexandra Point, Singapore, SGP, 119958
Fraser and Neave Ltd is a Singapore-based company that operates through four segments: dairies, beverages, publishing and printing industries, and others. The dairy segment generates the majority of total revenue by manufacturing, marketing, and selling dairy products. The beverages segment is the next contributor to total revenue through the production and selling of soft drinks and alcoholic beverages. The publishing and printing business operates through a network of offices, printing plants, and distributors. The company mainly operates in Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand.
77GF Score

Get the complete analysis for STU:FNV2

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

€0.94
Price
€0.86
GF Value