Snap-on (STU:SPU) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 29% Below Median


STU:SPU Snap-on Inc STU:SPU
90 GF Score
Price €348.20
GF Value €278.83
Valuation Modestly Overvalued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Snap-on Piotroski F-Score?

Snap-on STU:SPU -0.91% 90 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 29% below its 10-year median of 7.00. GuruFocus rates STU:SPU with a GF Score™ of 90/100 and a GF Value™ of €278.83 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,979 Industrial Products companies, Snap-on ranks better than 56.63% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Snap-on has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Snap-on's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

STU:SPU' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5   Med: 7   Max: 9
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Snap-on was 9. The lowest was 5. And the median was 7.

Snap-on  (STU:SPU) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Snap-on Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Snap-on Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Snap-on's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Snap-on Piotroski F-Score Chart

Snap-on Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 8.00 7.00 9.00 7.00 6.00

Snap-on Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 5.00

STU:SPU vs RBC, LECO, SWK: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Tools & Accessories subindustry, Snap-on's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Snap-on Piotroski F-Score vs Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, Snap-on's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Snap-on's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


STU:SPU
90GF Score
Snap-on Inc STU:SPU
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 217.01 + 226.121 + 222.638 + 213.655 = €879 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 205.652 + 236.771 + 228.957 + 318.925 = €990 Mil.
Revenue was 1110.714 + 1100.699 + 1144.275 + 1131.679 = €4,487 Mil.
Gross Profit was 575.428 + 574.93 + 580.635 + 584.999 = €2,316 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(7463.825 + 7110.961 + 7118.971 + 7184.104 + 7366.686) / 5 = €7248.9094 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was €7,464 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €826 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €3,934 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €1,115 Mil.
Net Income was 251.945 + 226.241 + 246.486 + 222.462 = €947 Mil.

Revenue was 1189.027 + 1123.907 + 1240.736 + 1149.96 = €4,704 Mil.
Gross Profit was 620.108 + 594.21 + 632.974 + 600.14 = €2,447 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(7053.456 + 7208.947 + 7165.923 + 7541.444 + 7463.825) / 5 = €7286.719 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was €7,053 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €1,162 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €3,831 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €925 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Snap-on's current Net Income (TTM) was 879. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Snap-on's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 990. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=879.424/7463.825
=0.11782484

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=947.134/7053.456
=0.13427942

Snap-on's return on assets of this year was 0.11782484. Snap-on's return on assets of last year was 0.13427942. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Snap-on's current Net Income (TTM) was 879. Snap-on's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 990. ==> 990 > 879 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=825.902/7248.9094
=0.11393466

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=1161.522/7286.719
=0.15940261

Snap-on's gearing of this year was 0.11393466. Snap-on's gearing of last year was 0.15940261. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=3933.76/1115.071
=3.52781123

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=3830.795/924.907
=4.14181642

Snap-on's current ratio of this year was 3.52781123. Snap-on's current ratio of last year was 4.14181642. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Snap-on's number of shares in issue this year was 52.701. Snap-on's number of shares in issue last year was 53.283. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2315.992/4487.367
=0.51611379

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2447.432/4703.63
=0.52032834

Snap-on's gross margin of this year was 0.51611379. Snap-on's gross margin of last year was 0.52032834. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=4487.367/7463.825
=0.60121546

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=4703.63/7053.456
=0.66685466

Snap-on's asset turnover of this year was 0.60121546. Snap-on's asset turnover of last year was 0.66685466. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Snap-on has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Snap-on (STU:SPU) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Snap-on and its competitors. This is 29% below median its historical median of 7.00. Over the past decade, Snap-on's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Snap-on ranks #1292 out of 2979 companies in the Industrial Products industry, placing it in the top 43.4%.
Is Snap-on's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Snap-on's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 29% below median its 10-year median of 7.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 5.00 to a high of 9.00. The Industrial Products industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Snap-on's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Snap-on ranks #1292 out of 2979 companies in the Industrial Products industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Snap-on has a GF Score™ of 90/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Snap-on's Piotroski F-Score compare to RBC and LECO?
According to the Industrial Products industry distribution chart, Snap-on ranks #1292 out of 2979 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Snap-on in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Snap-on's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Snap-on's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 7.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Snap-on has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Industrial Products company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Industrial Products companies is 5.00, based on 2,979 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Snap-on's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Snap-on and its competitors. For the Industrial Products industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Snap-on's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 29% below median its own 10-year median of 7.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Snap-on stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Snap-on (STU:SPU) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is €278.83, compared to a current price of €348.20 — trading 24.9% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 29% below median its 10-year median of 7.00 and 0% at the Industrial Products industry median of 5.00. Snap-on's overall GF Score™ is 90/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Snap-on (STU:SPU), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Snap-on (STU:SPU) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Snap-on stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of €348.20 is trading 24.9% above its estimated GF Value™ of €278.83. GuruFocus considers Snap-on to be Modestly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for STU:SPU:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (29% below median its 10-year median of 7.00)
  • GF Value™: €278.83 vs. price of €348.20 (24.9% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 90/100 with 5 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Industrial Products median (#1292 of 2979)

No single metric tells the full story. See the STU:SPU stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Snap-on Business Description

Address 2801 80th Street, Kenosha, WI, USA, 53143
Snap-on is a manufacturer of premium tools, equipment, and diagnostics for professional technicians, primarily involved in the repair of passenger cars but having expanded into other industrial applications. The company's legacy business is selling hand tools through franchisee-operated mobile vans to technicians who purchase the tools at their own expense. The company also operates a commercial and industrial business that is focused on repair facilities serving other industries. The third segment, repair systems and information, targets auto OEMs and large dealerships more directly and also offers substantial diagnostic solutions to aid repairs. The company's finance arm provides financing to franchisees to run their operations, as well as underwriting end customer purchases.
90GF Score

Get the complete analysis for STU:SPU

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

€348.20
Price
€278.83
GF Value