TMGI (Transglobal Management Group) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jul. 31, 2026) — 25% Above Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Transglobal Management Group Piotroski F-Score?

Transglobal Management Group TMGI Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 31, 2026, which is 25% above its 10-year median of 4.00. The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 556 Conglomerates companies, Transglobal Management Group ranks better than 51.62% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Transglobal Management Group has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Transglobal Management Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TMGI' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 5
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Transglobal Management Group was 5. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Transglobal Management Group  (OTCPK:TMGI) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Transglobal Management Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Transglobal Management Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Transglobal Management Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Transglobal Management Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

Transglobal Management Group Annual Data
Trend May16 May17 May18 May19 May20 May21 May22 May23 May24 May25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 4.00

Transglobal Management Group Quarterly Data
May21 Aug21 Nov21 Feb22 May22 Aug22 Nov22 Feb23 May23 Aug23 Nov23 Feb24 May24 Aug24 Nov24 Feb25 May25 Aug25 Nov25 Feb26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00

TMGI vs CIRX, MMM, HON: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Conglomerates subindustry, Transglobal Management Group's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Transglobal Management Group Piotroski F-Score vs Conglomerates Industry

For the Conglomerates industry and Industrials sector, Transglobal Management Group's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Transglobal Management Group's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Feb26) TTM:Last Year (Feb25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.479 + -2.43 + -2.29 + -1.688 = $-6.89 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.009 + -0.063 + -0.798 + -0.398 = $-1.27 Mil.
Revenue was 0.011 + 0.012 + 0.015 + 0.448 = $0.49 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.011 + 0.012 + 0.015 + 0.119 = $0.16 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Feb25)
to the end of this year (Feb26) was
(6.251 + 6.259 + 2.611 + 2.86 + 3.328) / 5 = $4.2618 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Feb25) was $6.25 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.79 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $8.77 Mil.
Net Income was 0.075 + -0.205 + -0.155 + -0.109 = $-0.39 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Feb24)
to the end of last year (Feb25) was
(6.249 + 6.247 + 6.247 + 6.247 + 6.251) / 5 = $6.2482 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Feb24) was $6.25 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $5.34 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Transglobal Management Group's current Net Income (TTM) was -6.89. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Transglobal Management Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1.27. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Feb25)
=-6.887/6.251
=-1.10174372

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Feb24)
=-0.394/6.249
=-0.06305009

Transglobal Management Group's return on assets of this year was -1.10174372. Transglobal Management Group's return on assets of last year was -0.06305009. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Transglobal Management Group's current Net Income (TTM) was -6.89. Transglobal Management Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1.27. ==> -1.27 > -6.89 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Feb26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Feb25 to Feb26
=0/4.2618
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Feb25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Feb24 to Feb25
=0/6.2482
=0

Transglobal Management Group's gearing of this year was 0. Transglobal Management Group's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Feb26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.792/8.77
=0.09030787

Current Ratio (Last Year: Feb25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.004/5.344
=0.0007485

Transglobal Management Group's current ratio of this year was 0.09030787. Transglobal Management Group's current ratio of last year was 0.0007485. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Transglobal Management Group's number of shares in issue this year was 3.002. Transglobal Management Group's number of shares in issue last year was 3.349. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.157/0.486
=0.32304527

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Transglobal Management Group's gross margin of this year was 0.32304527. Transglobal Management Group's gross margin of last year was . ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Feb25)
=0.486/6.251
=0.07774756

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Feb24)
=0/6.249
=0

Transglobal Management Group's asset turnover of this year was 0.07774756. Transglobal Management Group's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+1+1+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Transglobal Management Group has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Transglobal Management Group (TMGI) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jul. 31, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Transglobal Management Group and its competitors. This is 25% above median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Transglobal Management Group's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Transglobal Management Group ranks #269 out of 556 companies in the Conglomerates industry, placing it in the top 48.4%.
Is Transglobal Management Group's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Transglobal Management Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 25% above median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 5.00. The Conglomerates industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Transglobal Management Group's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Transglobal Management Group ranks #269 out of 556 companies in the Conglomerates industry, which is above the industry midpoint.
How does Transglobal Management Group's Piotroski F-Score compare to CIRX and MMM?
According to the Conglomerates industry distribution chart, Transglobal Management Group ranks #269 out of 556 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Transglobal Management Group in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Transglobal Management Group's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Transglobal Management Group's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Transglobal Management Group has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Conglomerates company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Conglomerates companies is 5.00, based on 556 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Transglobal Management Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Transglobal Management Group and its competitors. For the Conglomerates industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Transglobal Management Group's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 25% above median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Transglobal Management Group stock overvalued right now?
Transglobal Management Group (TMGI) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 5. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 25% above median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 0% at the Conglomerates industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Transglobal Management Group (TMGI), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 31, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Transglobal Management Group Business Description

Address 7901 4th Street North, Suite 4887, Saint Petersburgh, FL, USA, 33702
Transglobal Management Group Inc is an international management and investment company focused on growing businesses across the golf, hospitality, and technology industries.