Billing System (TSE:3623) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jul. 13, 2026) — 17% Below Median


TSE:3623 Billing System Corp TSE:3623
69 GF Score
Price 円1,033.00
GF Value 円1,338.16
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Billing System Piotroski F-Score?

Billing System TSE:3623 -0.10% 69 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 13, 2026, which is 17% below its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates TSE:3623 with a GF Score™ of 69/100 and a GF Value™ of 円1,338.16 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,740 Software companies, Billing System ranks better than 59.74% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Billing System has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Billing System's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSE:3623' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 7
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Billing System was 7. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.

Billing System  (TSE:3623) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Billing System Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Billing System Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Billing System's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Billing System Piotroski F-Score Chart

Billing System Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 5.00 7.00 6.00 5.00

Billing System Quarterly Data
Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00

TSE:3623 vs MSFT, ORCL, PLTR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Infrastructure subindustry, Billing System's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Billing System Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Billing System's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Billing System's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TSE:3623
69GF Score
Billing System Corp TSE:3623
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was 円408 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 円4,201 Mil.
Revenue was 円4,547 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円1,621 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (25954.411 + 30146.75) / 2 = 円28050.5805 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was 円25,954 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円29,740 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円26,828 Mil.
Net Income was 円407 Mil.

Revenue was 円4,218 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円1,534 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (21291.573 + 25954.411) / 2 = 円23622.992 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was 円21,292 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円25,559 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円22,938 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Billing System's current Net Income (TTM) was 408. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Billing System's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 4,201. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=408.022/25954.411
=0.01572072

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=406.905/21291.573
=0.01911108

Billing System's return on assets of this year was 0.01572072. Billing System's return on assets of last year was 0.01911108. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Billing System's current Net Income (TTM) was 408. Billing System's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 4,201. ==> 4,201 > 408 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=0/28050.5805
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=0/23622.992
=0

Billing System's gearing of this year was 0. Billing System's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=29740.015/26828.374
=1.10852842

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=25559.281/22937.659
=1.11429335

Billing System's current ratio of this year was 1.10852842. Billing System's current ratio of last year was 1.11429335. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Billing System's number of shares in issue this year was 6.289. Billing System's number of shares in issue last year was 6.289. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1620.808/4546.706
=0.35647961

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1533.666/4218.23
=0.36358046

Billing System's gross margin of this year was 0.35647961. Billing System's gross margin of last year was 0.36358046. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=4546.706/25954.411
=0.17518047

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=4218.23/21291.573
=0.19811735

Billing System's asset turnover of this year was 0.17518047. Billing System's asset turnover of last year was 0.19811735. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Billing System has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Billing System (TSE:3623) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jul. 13, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Billing System and its competitors. This is 17% below median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Billing System's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Billing System ranks #1103 out of 2740 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 40.3%.
Is Billing System's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Billing System's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 17% below median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 7.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Billing System's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Billing System ranks #1103 out of 2740 companies in the Software industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Billing System has a GF Score™ of 69/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Billing System's Piotroski F-Score compare to MSFT and ORCL?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Billing System ranks #1103 out of 2740 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Billing System in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Billing System's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Billing System's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Billing System has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,740 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Billing System's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Billing System and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Billing System's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 17% below median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Billing System stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Billing System (TSE:3623) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is 円1,338.16, compared to a current price of 円1,033.00 — trading 22.8% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 17% below median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 0% at the Software industry median of 5.00. Billing System's overall GF Score™ is 69/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Billing System (TSE:3623), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 13, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Billing System (TSE:3623) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Billing System stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of 円1,033.00 is trading 22.8% below its estimated GF Value™ of 円1,338.16. GuruFocus considers Billing System to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for TSE:3623:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (17% below median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: 円1,338.16 vs. price of 円1,033.00 (22.8% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 69/100 with 3 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Software median (#1103 of 2740)

No single metric tells the full story. See the TSE:3623 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Billing System Business Description

Address 1-2-2 Uchisaiwaicho, 13th Floor, Hibiya Daibiru, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JPN, 100-0011
Billing System Corp offers a variety of payment services, including collection agency services, remittance support, smartphone payment service PayB, and more. It also support the introduction of in-store payments such as WeChat Pay, Alipay+, and PayPay, as well as the development and operation of WeChat mini-programs.
69GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSE:3623

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

円1,033.00
Price
円1,338.16
GF Value