Anaergia (TSX:ANRG) Piotroski F-Score: 7 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 75% Above Median


TSX:ANRG Anaergia Inc TSX:ANRG
43 GF Score
Price C$2.57
GF Value C$0.91
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Anaergia Piotroski F-Score?

Anaergia TSX:ANRG -1.53% 43 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 75% above its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates TSX:ANRG with a GF Score™ of 43/100 and a GF Value™ of C$0.91 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 240 Waste Management companies, Anaergia ranks better than 89.17% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Anaergia has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Anaergia's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSX:ANRG' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 7

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Anaergia was 7. The lowest was 1. And the median was 4.

Anaergia  (TSX:ANRG) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Anaergia Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Anaergia Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Anaergia's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Anaergia Piotroski F-Score Chart

Anaergia Annual Data
Trend Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 3.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 7.00

Anaergia Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 6.00 7.00 7.00

TSX:ANRG vs WM, RSG, WCN: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Waste Management subindustry, Anaergia's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Anaergia Piotroski F-Score vs Waste Management Industry

For the Waste Management industry and Industrials sector, Anaergia's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Anaergia's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TSX:ANRG
43GF Score
Anaergia Inc TSX:ANRG
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -6.988 + 2.391 + 14.546 + -1.828 = C$8.1 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 4.188 + 15.033 + 2.459 + -6.311 = C$15.4 Mil.
Revenue was 32.261 + 51.363 + 71.685 + 55.228 = C$210.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was 10.494 + 14.771 + 16.095 + 12.686 = C$54.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(223.03 + 226.139 + 237.212 + 237.941 + 247.401) / 5 = C$234.3446 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was C$223.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$20.9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$115.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$161.2 Mil.
Net Income was -10.634 + -9.847 + -15.025 + -2.985 = C$-38.5 Mil.

Revenue was 23.591 + 29.029 + 34.057 + 24.876 = C$111.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was 4.149 + 5.997 + 9.007 + 5.403 = C$24.6 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(246.963 + 250.741 + 240.309 + 233.327 + 223.03) / 5 = C$238.874 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was C$247.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$36.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$98.0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$121.1 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Anaergia's current Net Income (TTM) was 8.1. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Anaergia's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 15.4. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=8.121/223.03
=0.03641214

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-38.491/246.963
=-0.15585736

Anaergia's return on assets of this year was 0.03641214. Anaergia's return on assets of last year was -0.15585736. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Anaergia's current Net Income (TTM) was 8.1. Anaergia's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 15.4. ==> 15.4 > 8.1 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=20.944/234.3446
=0.08937266

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=36.679/238.874
=0.15354957

Anaergia's gearing of this year was 0.08937266. Anaergia's gearing of last year was 0.15354957. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=115.536/161.211
=0.71667566

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=98.047/121.124
=0.80947624

Anaergia's current ratio of this year was 0.71667566. Anaergia's current ratio of last year was 0.80947624. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Anaergia's number of shares in issue this year was 171.405. Anaergia's number of shares in issue last year was 169.839. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=54.046/210.537
=0.25670547

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=24.556/111.553
=0.22012855

Anaergia's gross margin of this year was 0.25670547. Anaergia's gross margin of last year was 0.22012855. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=210.537/223.03
=0.94398511

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=111.553/246.963
=0.45169924

Anaergia's asset turnover of this year was 0.94398511. Anaergia's asset turnover of last year was 0.45169924. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+0+0+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Anaergia has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 7 mean?
Anaergia (TSX:ANRG) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Anaergia and its competitors. This is 75% above median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Anaergia's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Anaergia ranks #26 out of 240 companies in the Waste Management industry, placing it in the top 10.8%.
Is Anaergia's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Anaergia's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 75% above median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 7.00. The Waste Management industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Anaergia's value of 7 is 40% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Anaergia ranks #26 out of 240 companies in the Waste Management industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Anaergia has a GF Score™ of 43/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Anaergia's Piotroski F-Score compare to WM and RSG?
According to the Waste Management industry distribution chart, Anaergia ranks #26 out of 240 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Anaergia in the top 11% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Anaergia's value of 7 is 40% above this benchmark. Historically, Anaergia's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Anaergia has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Waste Management company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Waste Management companies is 5.00, based on 240 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Anaergia's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Anaergia and its competitors. For the Waste Management industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Anaergia's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 75% above median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Anaergia stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Anaergia (TSX:ANRG) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is C$0.91, compared to a current price of C$2.57 — trading 182.4% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 75% above median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 40% above the Waste Management industry median of 5.00. Anaergia's overall GF Score™ is 43/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Anaergia (TSX:ANRG), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Anaergia (TSX:ANRG) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Anaergia stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of C$2.57 is trading 182.4% above its estimated GF Value™ of C$0.91. GuruFocus considers Anaergia to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for TSX:ANRG:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 7 (75% above median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: C$0.91 vs. price of C$2.57 (182.4% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 43/100 with 5 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% above the Waste Management median (#26 of 240)

No single metric tells the full story. See the TSX:ANRG stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Anaergia Business Description

Other Exchanges ANRGF:USA
Address 4210 South Service Road, Burlington, ON, CAN, L7L 4X5
Anaergia Inc is engaged in the generation of renewable energy from biogas through advance anaerobic digestion of organic residues from municipal, agricultural, and industrial sources. Its operating segments are Capital Sales, Services, and Build, Own, and Operate Projects. It derives key revenue from the Capital Sales segment, which consists of the sales of proprietary technology solutions and services to third-party customers, predominantly municipalities, private entities, and project developers. The group derives revenue from the U.S., Canada, Italy, and other countries. The group has entities in Europe, North America, South Africa, and Australia.
43GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSX:ANRG

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

C$2.57
Price
C$0.91
GF Value