Granada Gold Mine (TSXV:GGM) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jul. 14, 2026) — Near Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Granada Gold Mine Piotroski F-Score?

Granada Gold Mine TSXV:GGM Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 14, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 3.00. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,510 Metals & Mining companies, Granada Gold Mine ranks better than 59.2% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Granada Gold Mine has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Granada Gold Mine's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSXV:GGM' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 4
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Granada Gold Mine was 4. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.

Granada Gold Mine  (TSXV:GGM) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Granada Gold Mine Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Granada Gold Mine Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Granada Gold Mine's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Granada Gold Mine Piotroski F-Score Chart

Granada Gold Mine Annual Data
Trend Jun16 Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00

Granada Gold Mine Quarterly Data
Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00

TSXV:GGM vs NEM, AU: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Gold subindustry, Granada Gold Mine's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Granada Gold Mine Piotroski F-Score vs Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Granada Gold Mine's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Granada Gold Mine's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was -0.447 + -0.557 + -0.572 + -0.65 = C$-2.23 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.193 + -0.013 + 0.033 + -0.031 = C$-0.20 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was
(0.972 + 0.772 + 0.516 + 0.567 + 0.585) / 5 = C$0.6824 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was C$0.97 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$0.17 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$14.81 Mil.
Net Income was -0.312 + -0.87 + -0.401 + -0.42 = C$-2.00 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was
(0.806 + 0.826 + 0.852 + 0.815 + 0.972) / 5 = C$0.8542 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was C$0.81 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$0.55 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$13.35 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Granada Gold Mine's current Net Income (TTM) was -2.23. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Granada Gold Mine's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.20. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=-2.226/0.972
=-2.29012346

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=-2.003/0.806
=-2.48511166

Granada Gold Mine's return on assets of this year was -2.29012346. Granada Gold Mine's return on assets of last year was -2.48511166. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Granada Gold Mine's current Net Income (TTM) was -2.23. Granada Gold Mine's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.20. ==> -0.20 > -2.23 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=0/0.6824
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=0/0.8542
=0

Granada Gold Mine's gearing of this year was 0. Granada Gold Mine's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.17/14.813
=0.01147641

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.545/13.349
=0.04082703

Granada Gold Mine's current ratio of this year was 0.01147641. Granada Gold Mine's current ratio of last year was 0.04082703. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Granada Gold Mine's number of shares in issue this year was 165.117. Granada Gold Mine's number of shares in issue last year was 159.104. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Granada Gold Mine's gross margin of this year was . Granada Gold Mine's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=0/0.972
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=0/0.806
=0

Granada Gold Mine's asset turnover of this year was 0. Granada Gold Mine's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+1+0+0+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Granada Gold Mine has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Granada Gold Mine (TSXV:GGM) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jul. 14, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Granada Gold Mine and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Granada Gold Mine's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 4.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Granada Gold Mine ranks #1024 out of 2510 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 40.8%.
Is Granada Gold Mine's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Granada Gold Mine's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is near median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 4.00. The Metals & Mining industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Granada Gold Mine's value of 3 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Granada Gold Mine ranks #1024 out of 2510 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is above the industry midpoint.
How does Granada Gold Mine's Piotroski F-Score compare to NEM and AU?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Granada Gold Mine ranks #1024 out of 2510 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Granada Gold Mine in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Granada Gold Mine's value of 3 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Granada Gold Mine's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 4.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 3.00, Granada Gold Mine has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Metals & Mining companies is 3.00, based on 2,510 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Granada Gold Mine's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Granada Gold Mine and its competitors. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Granada Gold Mine's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Granada Gold Mine stock overvalued right now?
Granada Gold Mine (TSXV:GGM) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 0% at the Metals & Mining industry median of 3.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Granada Gold Mine (TSXV:GGM), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 14, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Granada Gold Mine Business Description

Other Exchanges GBBFF:USAB6DA:Germany
Address 3028 Quadra Court, Coquitlam, BC, CAN, V3B 5X6
Granada Gold Mine Inc is a Canada-based company involved in the industrial metals and mining business sector. The company is a junior natural resource company, which is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral property interests. It operates in the Granada Gold project.