Gold Strategy (TSXV:GST) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jul. 05, 2026) — Near Median


TSXV:GST Gold Strategy Inc TSXV:GST
20 GF Score
Price C$1.62
! 1 Warning Sign
View Full Analysis

What is Gold Strategy Piotroski F-Score?

Gold Strategy TSXV:GST 20 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 05, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates TSXV:GST with a GF Score™ of 20/100. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 1,600 Asset Management companies, Gold Strategy ranks worse than 77.94% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Gold Strategy has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Gold Strategy's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSXV:GST' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Gold Strategy was 6. The lowest was 1. And the median was 3.

Gold Strategy  (TSXV:GST) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Gold Strategy Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Gold Strategy Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Gold Strategy's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Gold Strategy Piotroski F-Score Chart

Gold Strategy Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00

Gold Strategy Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

TSXV:GST vs BLK, BX, KKR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Asset Management subindustry, Gold Strategy's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Gold Strategy Piotroski F-Score vs Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Gold Strategy's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Gold Strategy's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TSXV:GST
20GF Score
Gold Strategy Inc TSXV:GST
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.017 + -0.009 + -0.066 + -0.064 = C$-0.16 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.01 + -0.016 + -0.041 + -0.07 = C$-0.14 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(0.023 + 0.037 + 0.02 + 0.291 + 0.221) / 5 = C$0.1184 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was C$0.02 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$0.22 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$0.27 Mil.
Net Income was -0.007 + -0.017 + -0.132 + -0.031 = C$-0.19 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(0.154 + 0.147 + 0.13 + 0.024 + 0.023) / 5 = C$0.0956 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was C$0.15 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$0.02 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$0.20 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Gold Strategy's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.16. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Gold Strategy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.14. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-0.156/0.023
=-6.7826087

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-0.187/0.154
=-1.21428571

Gold Strategy's return on assets of this year was -6.7826087. Gold Strategy's return on assets of last year was -1.21428571. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Gold Strategy's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.16. Gold Strategy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.14. ==> -0.14 > -0.16 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0/0.1184
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/0.0956
=0

Gold Strategy's gearing of this year was 0. Gold Strategy's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.221/0.274
=0.80656934

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.023/0.201
=0.11442786

Gold Strategy's current ratio of this year was 0.80656934. Gold Strategy's current ratio of last year was 0.11442786. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Gold Strategy's number of shares in issue this year was 1.062. Gold Strategy's number of shares in issue last year was 0.853. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gold Strategy's gross margin of this year was . Gold Strategy's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0/0.023
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=0/0.154
=0

Gold Strategy's asset turnover of this year was 0. Gold Strategy's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+1+0+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Gold Strategy has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Gold Strategy (TSXV:GST) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jul. 05, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Gold Strategy and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Gold Strategy's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Gold Strategy ranks #1247 out of 1600 companies in the Asset Management industry, placing it in the top 77.9%.
Is Gold Strategy's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Gold Strategy's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is near median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 6.00. The Asset Management industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Gold Strategy's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Gold Strategy ranks #1247 out of 1600 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Gold Strategy has a GF Score™ of 20/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Gold Strategy's Piotroski F-Score compare to BLK and BX?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, Gold Strategy ranks #1247 out of 1600 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Gold Strategy in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Gold Strategy's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Gold Strategy's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Gold Strategy has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Asset Management company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Asset Management companies is 5.00, based on 1,600 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Gold Strategy's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Gold Strategy and its competitors. For the Asset Management industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Gold Strategy's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Gold Strategy stock overvalued right now?
Gold Strategy (TSXV:GST) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 40% below the Asset Management industry median of 5.00. Gold Strategy's overall GF Score™ is 20/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Gold Strategy (TSXV:GST), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 05, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Gold Strategy Business Description

Other Exchanges XY7:Germany
Address 422 Richards Street, Suite 170, Vancouver, BC, CAN, V6B 2Z4
Gold Strategy Inc is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in Canada. It holds a small percentage of royalty interest in the Chubb and International Lithium Claims and the Canadian and McNeely Lithium Property in Quebec, Canada. Additionally, the company holds an option agreement to acquire the Apex Claims and Ace Claims in British Columbia.
20GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSXV:GST

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

C$1.62
Price