Ultra Lithium (TSXV:ULT) Piotroski F-Score: 0 (As of Aug. 11, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Ultra Lithium Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ultra Lithium has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ultra Lithium's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

Ultra Lithium  (TSXV:ULT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Ultra Lithium Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Ultra Lithium Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Ultra Lithium's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Ultra Lithium Piotroski F-Score Chart

Ultra Lithium Annual Data
Trend Oct15 Oct16 Oct17 Oct18 Oct19 Oct20 Oct21 Oct22 Oct23 Oct24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00

Ultra Lithium Quarterly Data
Oct20 Jan21 Apr21 Jul21 Oct21 Jan22 Apr22 Jul22 Oct22 Jan23 Apr23 Jul23 Oct23 Jan24 Apr24 Jul24 Oct24 Jan25 Apr25 Jul25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jul25) TTM:Last Year (Jul24) TTM:
Net Income was -3.852 + -0.298 + -0.253 + -0.25 = C$-4.65 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.309 + -0.176 + -0.042 + 0.229 = C$-0.30 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jul24)
to the end of this year (Jul25) was
(13.366 + 9.755 + 9.141 + 8.713 + 8.942) / 5 = C$9.9834 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jul24) was C$13.37 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$0.20 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$3.31 Mil.
Net Income was -1.661 + -0.13 + -0.477 + 0.19 = C$-2.08 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = C$0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jul23)
to the end of last year (Jul24) was
(13.281 + 13.726 + 13.339 + 13.37 + 13.366) / 5 = C$13.4164 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jul23) was C$13.28 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$0.19 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$2.85 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ultra Lithium's current Net Income (TTM) was -4.65. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ultra Lithium's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.30. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jul24)
=-4.653/13.366
=-0.3481221

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jul23)
=-2.078/13.281
=-0.15646412

Ultra Lithium's return on assets of this year was -0.3481221. Ultra Lithium's return on assets of last year was -0.15646412. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Ultra Lithium's current Net Income (TTM) was -4.65. Ultra Lithium's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.30. ==> -0.30 > -4.65 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jul25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jul24 to Jul25
=0/9.9834
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jul24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jul23 to Jul24
=0/13.4164
=0

Ultra Lithium's gearing of this year was 0. Ultra Lithium's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jul25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.195/3.307
=0.05896583

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jul24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.187/2.849
=0.06563707

Ultra Lithium's current ratio of this year was 0.05896583. Ultra Lithium's current ratio of last year was 0.06563707. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Ultra Lithium's number of shares in issue this year was 191.095. Ultra Lithium's number of shares in issue last year was 191.095. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Ultra Lithium's gross margin of this year was . Ultra Lithium's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jul24)
=0/13.366
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jul23)
=0/13.281
=0

Ultra Lithium's asset turnover of this year was 0. Ultra Lithium's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ultra Lithium has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.


Ultra Lithium Business Description

Other Exchanges ULTXF:USA
Address 1120 - 789 West Pender Street, Vancouver, BC, CAN, V6C 1H2
Ultra Lithium Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and evaluation of assets. The properties in which the company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. The geographical segments of the group are Canada, the United States, and Argentina. Some of its properties are Georgia Lake, Forgan Lake, Antofagasta, and La Rioja, La Borita, Antigua, Cordoba, and Others.