TTAPF (TTW PCL) Piotroski F-Score: 7 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — Near Median


TTAPF TTW PCL TTAPF
84 GF Score
Price $0.29
GF Value $0.28
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is TTW PCL Piotroski F-Score?

TTW PCL TTAPF 84 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 7.00. GuruFocus rates TTAPF with a GF Score™ of 84/100 and a GF Value™ of $0.28. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 490 Utilities - Regulated companies, TTW PCL ranks better than 89.18% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

TTW PCL has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for TTW PCL's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TTAPF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5   Med: 7   Max: 8
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of TTW PCL was 8. The lowest was 5. And the median was 7.

TTW PCL  (OTCPK:TTAPF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


TTW PCL Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


TTW PCL Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for TTW PCL's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

TTW PCL Piotroski F-Score Chart

TTW PCL Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 6.00 8.00 7.00 7.00

TTW PCL Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00

TTAPF vs AWK, WTRG, AWR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Utilities - Regulated Water subindustry, TTW PCL's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


TTW PCL Piotroski F-Score vs Utilities - Regulated Industry

For the Utilities - Regulated industry and Utilities sector, TTW PCL's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where TTW PCL's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TTAPF
84GF Score
TTW PCL TTAPF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 24.447 + 30.541 + 26.117 + 20.858 = $102.0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 21.175 + 22.376 + 29.057 + 28.196 = $100.8 Mil.
Revenue was 39.851 + 41.451 + 42.299 + 40.174 = $163.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 27.736 + 28.446 + 28.453 + 27.48 = $112.1 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(615.236 + 618.505 + 708.712 + 744.042 + 744.274) / 5 = $686.1538 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $615.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $129.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $118.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $69.7 Mil.
Net Income was 16.962 + 27.531 + 21.952 + 19.798 = $86.2 Mil.

Revenue was 34.783 + 38.714 + 37.616 + 37.88 = $149.0 Mil.
Gross Profit was 23.302 + 25.953 + 25.779 + 26.806 = $101.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(575.788 + 540.299 + 588.844 + 591.643 + 615.236) / 5 = $582.362 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $575.8 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $42.2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $114.2 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $81.2 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

TTW PCL's current Net Income (TTM) was 102.0. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

TTW PCL's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 100.8. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=101.963/615.236
=0.1657299

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=86.243/575.788
=0.14978256

TTW PCL's return on assets of this year was 0.1657299. TTW PCL's return on assets of last year was 0.14978256. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

TTW PCL's current Net Income (TTM) was 102.0. TTW PCL's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 100.8. ==> 100.8 <= 102.0 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=129.476/686.1538
=0.18869822

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=42.197/582.362
=0.07245837

TTW PCL's gearing of this year was 0.18869822. TTW PCL's gearing of last year was 0.07245837. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=118.67/69.748
=1.70141079

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=114.191/81.237
=1.4056526

TTW PCL's current ratio of this year was 1.70141079. TTW PCL's current ratio of last year was 1.4056526. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

TTW PCL's number of shares in issue this year was 3990. TTW PCL's number of shares in issue last year was 3990. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=112.115/163.775
=0.68456724

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=101.84/148.993
=0.68352204

TTW PCL's gross margin of this year was 0.68456724. TTW PCL's gross margin of last year was 0.68352204. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=163.775/615.236
=0.26619866

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=148.993/575.788
=0.25876364

TTW PCL's asset turnover of this year was 0.26619866. TTW PCL's asset turnover of last year was 0.25876364. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+0+1+1+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

TTW PCL has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 7 mean?
TTW PCL (TTAPF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on TTW PCL and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 7.00. Over the past decade, TTW PCL's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, TTW PCL ranks #53 out of 490 companies in the Utilities - Regulated industry, placing it in the top 10.8%.
Is TTW PCL's Piotroski F-Score too high?
TTW PCL's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is near median its 10-year median of 7.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 5.00 to a high of 8.00. The Utilities - Regulated industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. TTW PCL's value of 7 is 16.7% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, TTW PCL ranks #53 out of 490 companies in the Utilities - Regulated industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, TTW PCL has a GF Score™ of 84/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does TTW PCL's Piotroski F-Score compare to AWK and WTRG?
According to the Utilities - Regulated industry distribution chart, TTW PCL ranks #53 out of 490 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places TTW PCL in the top 11% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. TTW PCL's value of 7 is 16.7% above this benchmark. Historically, TTW PCL's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 7.00 vs. the industry median of 6.00, TTW PCL has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Utilities - Regulated company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Utilities - Regulated companies is 6.00, based on 490 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. TTW PCL's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 16.7% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on TTW PCL and its competitors. For the Utilities - Regulated industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. TTW PCL's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is near median its own 10-year median of 7.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is TTW PCL stock overvalued right now?
TTW PCL (TTAPF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 7. The stock's GF Value™ is $0.28, compared to a current price of $0.29 — trading 3.5% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is near median its 10-year median of 7.00 and 16.7% above the Utilities - Regulated industry median of 6.00. TTW PCL's overall GF Score™ is 84/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For TTW PCL (TTAPF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is TTW PCL (TTAPF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, TTW PCL stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $0.29 is trading 3.5% above its estimated GF Value™ of $0.28.

Key valuation signals for TTAPF:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 7 (near median its 10-year median of 7.00)
  • GF Value™: $0.28 vs. price of $0.29 (3.5% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 84/100 with 2 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 16.7% above the Utilities - Regulated median (#53 of 490)

No single metric tells the full story. See the TTAPF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


TTW PCL Business Description

Address Budha Monthon 5 Road, 30/130 Moo 12, Rai Khing, Sam Phran, Nakhon Pathom, THA, 73210
TTW PCL is a Thailand-based company chiefly engaged in the production and sale of treated water to its customers, the Provincial Waterworks Authority (PWA). The company supplies water to certain southern regions of Thailand that include Nakhon Pathom and Samut Sakhon. The subsidiaries of TTW PLC provide production, sale, operation, and maintenance services. The majority of the group's revenue is derived from sales of treated water to public sector agencies, while the rest is derived from private sector agencies and other sources. Geographically, the group operates only in Thailand.
84GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TTAPF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.29
Price
$0.28
GF Value