UPDC (UPD Holding) Piotroski F-Score: 0 (As of Aug. 08, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is UPD Holding Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

UPD Holding has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for UPD Holding's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

UPD Holding  (OTCPK:UPDC) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


UPD Holding Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


UPD Holding Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for UPD Holding's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

UPD Holding Piotroski F-Score Chart

UPD Holding Annual Data
Trend Jun13 Jun14 Jun15 Jun16 Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 3.00 4.00 1.00 5.00

UPD Holding Quarterly Data
Jun17 Sep17 Dec17 Mar18 Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Jun22
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A 1.00 2.00 1.00 5.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun22) TTM:Last Year (Mar21) TTM:
Net Income was -0.43 + -0.36 + -0.143 + -0.328 = $-1.26 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.138 + -0.336 + -0.267 + -0.085 = $-0.83 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0.038 = $0.04 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0.038 = $0.04 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar21)
to the end of this year (Jun22) was
(0.545 + 0.518 + 0.935 + 0.866 + 0.653) / 5 = $0.7034 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar21) was $0.55 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.03 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1.78 Mil.
Net Income was -0.035 + -0.054 + 0.199 + -0.201 = $-0.09 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar20)
to the end of last year (Mar21) was
(0.004 + 0.021 + 0.004 + 0.06 + 0.545) / 5 = $0.1268 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar20) was $0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.02 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.05 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.50 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

UPD Holding's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.26. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

UPD Holding's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.83. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar21)
=-1.261/0.545
=-2.31376147

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar20)
=-0.091/0.004
=-22.75

UPD Holding's return on assets of this year was -2.31376147. UPD Holding's return on assets of last year was -22.75. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

UPD Holding's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.26. UPD Holding's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.83. ==> -0.83 > -1.26 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar21 to Jun22
=0/0.7034
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar21)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar20 to Mar21
=0.023/0.1268
=0.18138801

UPD Holding's gearing of this year was 0. UPD Holding's gearing of last year was 0.18138801. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.027/1.775
=0.01521127

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar21)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.053/0.496
=0.10685484

UPD Holding's current ratio of this year was 0.01521127. UPD Holding's current ratio of last year was 0.10685484. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

UPD Holding's number of shares in issue this year was 194.98. UPD Holding's number of shares in issue last year was 185.136. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.038/0.038
=1

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

UPD Holding's gross margin of this year was 1. UPD Holding's gross margin of last year was . ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar21)
=0.038/0.545
=0.06972477

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar20)
=0/0.004
=0

UPD Holding's asset turnover of this year was 0.06972477. UPD Holding's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+1+0+0+1+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

UPD Holding has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.


UPD Holding Business Description

Address 75 Pringle Way, Suite 804, 8th Floor, Reno, NV, USA, 89502
UPD Holding Corp is a health and wellness company. The company focuses on nutraceutical and specialty beverages. It is engaged in the development, marketing, distribution, and sales of beverages such as waters infused with hemp-based nootropics, cannabinoids, and terpenes.