USPCY (China Strategic Technology Group) Piotroski F-Score: 2 (As of Jun. 24, 2026) — 50% Below Median


USPCY China Strategic Technology Group Ltd USPCY
46 GF Score
Price $0.92
GF Value $3.11
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is China Strategic Technology Group Piotroski F-Score?

China Strategic Technology Group USPCY 46 Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is 50% below its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates USPCY with a GF Score™ of 46/100 and a GF Value™ of $3.11. The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 319 Aerospace & Defense companies, China Strategic Technology Group ranks worse than 93.73% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Strategic Technology Group has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for China Strategic Technology Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

USPCY' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 4   Max: 8
Current: 2

During the past 11 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of China Strategic Technology Group was 8. The lowest was 1. And the median was 4.

China Strategic Technology Group  (OTCPK:USPCY) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


China Strategic Technology Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


China Strategic Technology Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for China Strategic Technology Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

China Strategic Technology Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

China Strategic Technology Group Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 1.00 3.00 4.00 2.00

China Strategic Technology Group Semi-Annual Data
Dec15 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 2.00

USPCY vs GE, RTX, BA: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Aerospace & Defense subindustry, China Strategic Technology Group's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


China Strategic Technology Group Piotroski F-Score vs Aerospace & Defense Industry

For the Aerospace & Defense industry and Industrials sector, China Strategic Technology Group's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where China Strategic Technology Group's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


USPCY
46GF Score
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd USPCY
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was $-46.18 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $-3.76 Mil.
Revenue was $91.22 Mil.
Gross Profit was $5.43 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (116.083 + 49.653) / 2 = $82.868 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was $116.08 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $14.02 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $41.85 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $69.27 Mil.
Net Income was $-27.20 Mil.

Revenue was $43.38 Mil.
Gross Profit was $6.61 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (161.744 + 116.083) / 2 = $138.9135 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was $161.74 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $21.62 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $49.38 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $71.58 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Strategic Technology Group's current Net Income (TTM) was -46.18. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Strategic Technology Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -3.76. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=-46.18/116.083
=-0.3978188

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=-27.196/161.744
=-0.16814225

China Strategic Technology Group's return on assets of this year was -0.3978188. China Strategic Technology Group's return on assets of last year was -0.16814225. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

China Strategic Technology Group's current Net Income (TTM) was -46.18. China Strategic Technology Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -3.76. ==> -3.76 > -46.18 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=14.015/82.868
=0.16912439

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=21.623/138.9135
=0.15565802

China Strategic Technology Group's gearing of this year was 0.16912439. China Strategic Technology Group's gearing of last year was 0.15565802. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=41.85/69.274
=0.60412276

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=49.376/71.584
=0.68976308

China Strategic Technology Group's current ratio of this year was 0.60412276. China Strategic Technology Group's current ratio of last year was 0.68976308. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

China Strategic Technology Group's number of shares in issue this year was 53.749. China Strategic Technology Group's number of shares in issue last year was 38.12. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=5.426/91.216
=0.05948518

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=6.61/43.375
=0.15239193

China Strategic Technology Group's gross margin of this year was 0.05948518. China Strategic Technology Group's gross margin of last year was 0.15239193. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=91.216/116.083
=0.78578259

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=43.375/161.744
=0.26817069

China Strategic Technology Group's asset turnover of this year was 0.78578259. China Strategic Technology Group's asset turnover of last year was 0.26817069. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+0+0+1
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Strategic Technology Group has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 2 mean?
China Strategic Technology Group (USPCY) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on China Strategic Technology Group and its competitors. This is 50% below median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, China Strategic Technology Group's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, China Strategic Technology Group ranks #299 out of 319 companies in the Aerospace & Defense industry, placing it in the top 93.7%.
Is China Strategic Technology Group's Piotroski F-Score too high?
China Strategic Technology Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 50% below median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 8.00. The Aerospace & Defense industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. China Strategic Technology Group's value of 2 is 60% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, China Strategic Technology Group ranks #299 out of 319 companies in the Aerospace & Defense industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, China Strategic Technology Group has a GF Score™ of 46/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does China Strategic Technology Group's Piotroski F-Score compare to GE and RTX?
According to the Aerospace & Defense industry distribution chart, China Strategic Technology Group ranks #299 out of 319 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places China Strategic Technology Group in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. China Strategic Technology Group's value of 2 is 60% below this benchmark. Historically, China Strategic Technology Group's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, China Strategic Technology Group has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Aerospace & Defense company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Aerospace & Defense companies is 5.00, based on 319 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. China Strategic Technology Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 60% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on China Strategic Technology Group and its competitors. For the Aerospace & Defense industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. China Strategic Technology Group's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 50% below median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is China Strategic Technology Group stock overvalued right now?
China Strategic Technology Group (USPCY) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 2. The stock's GF Value™ is $3.11, compared to a current price of $0.92 — trading 70.4% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 50% below median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 60% below the Aerospace & Defense industry median of 5.00. China Strategic Technology Group's overall GF Score™ is 46/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For China Strategic Technology Group (USPCY), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is China Strategic Technology Group (USPCY) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, China Strategic Technology Group stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $0.92 is trading 70.4% below its estimated GF Value™ of $3.11.

Key valuation signals for USPCY:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 2 (50% below median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: $3.11 vs. price of $0.92 (70.4% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 46/100 with 6 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 60% below the Aerospace & Defense median (#299 of 319)

No single metric tells the full story. See the USPCY stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


China Strategic Technology Group Business Description

Other Exchanges 01725:Hong Kong
Address 222 Xingmin Road, No. Unit 07-10, 54th Floor, East Tower, Tianying Plaza, Zhujiang New Town, Tianhe District, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, CHN
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd is an investment holding company. Along with its subsidiaries, it is principally engaged in two reportable business segments: Aerospace Business and the EMS Business. The Aerospace business comprises satellite manufacturing, satellite component manufacturing, precision electronics manufacturing, satellite data applications, satellite telemetry, tracking, and controlling (TT&C), and satellite launch; and the EMS Business includes assembling and PCBAs and fully-assembled electronic products. The Group generates maximum revenue from its EMS Business. Geographically, it derives maximum revenue from Hong Kong, followed by Mainland China, South Korea, India, Australia, Germany, Vietnam, the USA, and other regions.
46GF Score

Get the complete analysis for USPCY

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.92
Price
$3.11
GF Value