VANAF (Largo Physical Vanadium) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 30, 2026) — Near Median


VANAF Largo Physical Vanadium Corp VANAF
39 GF Score
Price $0.60
View Full Analysis

What is Largo Physical Vanadium Piotroski F-Score?

Largo Physical Vanadium VANAF -0.27% 39 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 30, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates VANAF with a GF Score™ of 39/100. Among 2,507 Metals & Mining companies, Largo Physical Vanadium ranks better than 85.92% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Largo Physical Vanadium has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Largo Physical Vanadium's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

VANAF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 5

During the past 5 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Largo Physical Vanadium was 6. The lowest was 4. And the median was 5.

Largo Physical Vanadium  (OTCPK:VANAF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Largo Physical Vanadium Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Largo Physical Vanadium Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Largo Physical Vanadium's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Largo Physical Vanadium Piotroski F-Score Chart

Largo Physical Vanadium Annual Data
Trend Jul21 Jul22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A N/A 6.00 4.00

Largo Physical Vanadium Quarterly Data
Jul21 Jul22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00

Largo Physical Vanadium Piotroski F-Score Competitor Comparison

For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Largo Physical Vanadium's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Largo Physical Vanadium Piotroski F-Score vs Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Largo Physical Vanadium's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Largo Physical Vanadium's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


VANAF
39GF Score
Largo Physical Vanadium Corp VANAF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.2 + -0.158 + 0.395 + 5.713 = $5.75 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.279 + -0.088 + -0.107 + -0.138 = $-0.61 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0.435 + 5.956 = $6.39 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0.435 + 5.956 = $6.39 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(17.88 + 17.627 + 17.581 + 18.048 + 23.866) / 5 = $19.0004 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $17.88 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.17 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.87 Mil.
Net Income was -0.61 + -1.456 + 0.17 + -0.378 = $-2.27 Mil.

Revenue was 0.006 + 0 + -1.842 + -0.157 = $-1.99 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.006 + 0 + -1.842 + -0.157 = $-1.99 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(19.969 + 19.391 + 17.845 + 18.211 + 17.88) / 5 = $18.6592 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $19.97 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.73 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.67 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Largo Physical Vanadium's current Net Income (TTM) was 5.75. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Largo Physical Vanadium's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.61. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=5.75/17.88
=0.32158837

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-2.274/19.969
=-0.11387651

Largo Physical Vanadium's return on assets of this year was 0.32158837. Largo Physical Vanadium's return on assets of last year was -0.11387651. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Largo Physical Vanadium's current Net Income (TTM) was 5.75. Largo Physical Vanadium's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.61. ==> -0.61 <= 5.75 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0/19.0004
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/18.6592
=0

Largo Physical Vanadium's gearing of this year was 0. Largo Physical Vanadium's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.166/0.87
=0.1908046

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.732/0.667
=1.09745127

Largo Physical Vanadium's current ratio of this year was 0.1908046. Largo Physical Vanadium's current ratio of last year was 1.09745127. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Largo Physical Vanadium's number of shares in issue this year was 16.804. Largo Physical Vanadium's number of shares in issue last year was 18.898. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=6.391/6.391
=1

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-1.993/-1.993
=1

Largo Physical Vanadium's gross margin of this year was 1. Largo Physical Vanadium's gross margin of last year was 1. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=6.391/17.88
=0.35743848

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=-1.993/19.969
=-0.0998047

Largo Physical Vanadium's asset turnover of this year was 0.35743848. Largo Physical Vanadium's asset turnover of last year was -0.0998047. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+1+0+1+0+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Largo Physical Vanadium has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Largo Physical Vanadium (VANAF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 30, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Largo Physical Vanadium and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Largo Physical Vanadium's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Largo Physical Vanadium ranks #353 out of 2507 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 14.1%.
Is Largo Physical Vanadium's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Largo Physical Vanadium's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 6.00. The Metals & Mining industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Largo Physical Vanadium's value of 5 is 66.7% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Largo Physical Vanadium ranks #353 out of 2507 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Largo Physical Vanadium has a GF Score™ of 39/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Largo Physical Vanadium's Piotroski F-Score compare to competitors?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Largo Physical Vanadium ranks #353 out of 2507 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Largo Physical Vanadium in the top 14% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Largo Physical Vanadium's value of 5 is 66.7% above this benchmark. Historically, Largo Physical Vanadium's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 3.00, Largo Physical Vanadium has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Metals & Mining companies is 3.00, based on 2,507 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Largo Physical Vanadium's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 66.7% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Largo Physical Vanadium and its competitors. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Largo Physical Vanadium's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Largo Physical Vanadium stock overvalued right now?
Largo Physical Vanadium (VANAF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 5. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 66.7% above the Metals & Mining industry median of 3.00. Largo Physical Vanadium's overall GF Score™ is 39/100. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Largo Physical Vanadium (VANAF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 30, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Largo Physical Vanadium Business Description

Other Exchanges VAND:Canada
Address 100 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON, CAN, M5X 1G5
Largo Physical Vanadium Corp is engaged in manufacturing high-quality vanadium products. It also aims to provide a secure, convenient, and exchange-traded investment alternative for investors interested in direct investment exposure to physical vanadium and not to speculate about short-term changes in vanadium prices.
39GF Score

Get the complete analysis for VANAF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.60
Price