VLRMF (Valereum) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 24, 2026) — 67% Above Median


What is Valereum Piotroski F-Score?

Valereum VLRMF Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is 67% above its 10-year median of 3.00. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,739 Software companies, Valereum ranks better than 59.88% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Valereum has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Valereum's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

VLRMF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 5
Current: 5

During the past 12 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Valereum was 5. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.

Valereum  (OTCPK:VLRMF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Valereum Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Valereum Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Valereum's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Valereum Piotroski F-Score Chart

Valereum Annual Data
Trend Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 5.00

Valereum Semi-Annual Data
Jun14 Dec14 Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Sep17 Mar18 Sep18 Mar19 Sep19 Mar20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 2.00 0.00 5.00 0.00

VLRMF vs MSFT, ORCL, PLTR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Infrastructure subindustry, Valereum's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Valereum Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Valereum's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Valereum's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec24) TTM:Last Year (Dec23) TTM:
Net Income was $0.00 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $-2.78 Mil.
Revenue was $0.02 Mil.
Gross Profit was $0.02 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec23)
to the end of this year (Dec24) was (3.084 + 6.384) / 2 = $4.734 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec23) was $3.08 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.16 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $2.63 Mil.
Net Income was $-0.45 Mil.

Revenue was $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec22)
to the end of last year (Dec23) was (1.448 + 3.084) / 2 = $2.266 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec22) was $1.45 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.14 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $2.64 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Valereum's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.00. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Valereum's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.78. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=0.004/3.084
=0.00129702

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec22)
=-0.447/1.448
=-0.30870166

Valereum's return on assets of this year was 0.00129702. Valereum's return on assets of last year was -0.30870166. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Valereum's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.00. Valereum's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.78. ==> -2.78 <= 0.00 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=0/4.734
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Dec23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec22 to Dec23
=0/2.266
=0

Valereum's gearing of this year was 0. Valereum's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.163/2.625
=0.06209524

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.143/2.639
=0.05418719

Valereum's current ratio of this year was 0.06209524. Valereum's current ratio of last year was 0.05418719. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Valereum's number of shares in issue this year was 138.053. Valereum's number of shares in issue last year was 91.51. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.024/0.024
=1

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Valereum's gross margin of this year was 1. Valereum's gross margin of last year was . ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec23)
=0.024/3.084
=0.0077821

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec22)
=0/1.448
=0

Valereum's asset turnover of this year was 0.0077821. Valereum's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+1+1+0+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Valereum has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Valereum (VLRMF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Valereum and its competitors. This is 67% above median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Valereum's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Valereum ranks #1099 out of 2739 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 40.1%.
Is Valereum's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Valereum's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 67% above median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 5.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Valereum's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Valereum ranks #1099 out of 2739 companies in the Software industry, which is above the industry midpoint.
How does Valereum's Piotroski F-Score compare to MSFT and ORCL?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Valereum ranks #1099 out of 2739 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Valereum in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Valereum's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Valereum's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Valereum has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,739 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Valereum's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Valereum and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Valereum's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 67% above median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Valereum stock overvalued right now?
Valereum (VLRMF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 5. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 67% above median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 0% at the Software industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Valereum (VLRMF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Valereum Business Description

Other Exchanges VLRM:UK6TJ:Germany
Address 6 Bayside Road, 6.20 World Trade Center, Gibraltar, GIB, GX11 1AA
Valereum PLC is a fintech company seeking to unlock capital & create value in tokenized digital markets, both as a technology provider and as a marketplace operator. It aims to be in developing tokenized digital markets sector.