Clean & Carbon EnergyWAR:CCE 9 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 40% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates WAR:CCE with a GF Score™ of 9/100. The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 174 Other Energy Sources companies, Clean & Carbon Energy ranks worse than 60.34% on this metric.
Warning Sign:
Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Clean & Carbon Energy has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
The historical rank and industry rank for Clean & Carbon Energy's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
WAR:CCE'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3 Med: 5 Max: 7
Current: 3
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Clean & Carbon Energy was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.
Clean & Carbon Energy (WAR:CCE) Piotroski F-Score Explanation
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Clean & Carbon Energy Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Clean & Carbon Energy Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Clean & Carbon Energy's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Thermal Coal subindustry, Clean & Carbon Energy's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Clean & Carbon Energy Piotroski F-Score vs Other Energy Sources Industry
For the Other Energy Sources industry and Energy sector, Clean & Carbon Energy's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Clean & Carbon Energy's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Clean & Carbon Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was -6.76.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Clean & Carbon Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -1.74.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 3. Change in Return on Assets
Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.
Clean & Carbon Energy's return on assets of this year was -0.38728357. Clean & Carbon Energy's return on assets of last year was -0.02127951.
==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Clean & Carbon Energy's gearing of this year was 0.04629279. Clean & Carbon Energy's gearing of last year was 0.01846812.
==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Clean & Carbon Energy's current ratio of this year was 0.04517424. Clean & Carbon Energy's current ratio of last year was 0.05258567.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Clean & Carbon Energy's number of shares in issue this year was 34.28. Clean & Carbon Energy's number of shares in issue last year was 34.28.
==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Clean & Carbon Energy's gross margin of this year was 1. Clean & Carbon Energy's gross margin of last year was 0.20946502.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Clean & Carbon Energy's asset turnover of this year was 0.01003325. Clean & Carbon Energy's asset turnover of last year was 0.16626753.
==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
0
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
0
=
3
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Clean & Carbon Energy has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
Clean & Carbon Energy (WAR:CCE) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Clean & Carbon Energy and its competitors. This is 40% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Clean & Carbon Energy's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Clean & Carbon Energy ranks #105 out of 174 companies in the Other Energy Sources industry, placing it in the top 60.3%.
Is Clean & Carbon Energy's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Clean & Carbon Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 7.00. The Other Energy Sources industry median Piotroski F-Score is 4.00. Clean & Carbon Energy's value of 3 is 25% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Clean & Carbon Energy ranks #105 out of 174 companies in the Other Energy Sources industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Clean & Carbon Energy has a GF Score™ of 9/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Clean & Carbon Energy's Piotroski F-Score compare to CNR?
According to the Other Energy Sources industry distribution chart, Clean & Carbon Energy ranks #105 out of 174 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Clean & Carbon Energy in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 4.00. Clean & Carbon Energy's value of 3 is 25% below this benchmark. Historically, Clean & Carbon Energy's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 4.00, Clean & Carbon Energy has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Other Energy Sources company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Other Energy Sources companies is 4.00, based on 174 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Clean & Carbon Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 25% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Clean & Carbon Energy and its competitors. For the Other Energy Sources industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 4.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Clean & Carbon Energy's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Clean & Carbon Energy stock overvalued right now?
Clean & Carbon Energy (WAR:CCE) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 25% below the Other Energy Sources industry median of 4.00. Clean & Carbon Energy's overall GF Score™ is 9/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Clean & Carbon Energy (WAR:CCE), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
WAR:CCE has been successfully added to your 
