Columbus Energy (WAR:CLC) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jul. 01, 2026) — 20% Below Median


WAR:CLC Columbus Energy SA WAR:CLC
49 GF Score
Price zł2.72
GF Value zł4.18
Valuation Possible Value Trap
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Columbus Energy Piotroski F-Score?

Columbus Energy WAR:CLC -2.86% 49 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jul. 01, 2026, which is 20% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates WAR:CLC with a GF Score™ of 49/100 and a GF Value™ of zł4.18 (Possible Value Trap). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 989 Semiconductors companies, Columbus Energy ranks worse than 60.36% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Columbus Energy has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Columbus Energy's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:CLC' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Columbus Energy was 8. The lowest was 1. And the median was 5.

Columbus Energy  (WAR:CLC) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Columbus Energy Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Columbus Energy Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Columbus Energy's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Columbus Energy Piotroski F-Score Chart

Columbus Energy Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 0.00

Columbus Energy Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 7.00 7.00 0.00 4.00

WAR:CLC vs FSLR, NXT, ENPH: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Solar subindustry, Columbus Energy's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Columbus Energy Piotroski F-Score vs Semiconductors Industry

For the Semiconductors industry and Technology sector, Columbus Energy's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Columbus Energy's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


WAR:CLC
49GF Score
Columbus Energy SA WAR:CLC
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 122.217 + 4.866 + 3.178 + -0.943 = zł129.3 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 9.974 + 2.653 + -31.505 + -21.73 = zł-40.6 Mil.
Revenue was 62.793 + 90.38 + 64.654 + 66.113 = zł283.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was 27.883 + 42.372 + 33.201 + 35.66 = zł139.1 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(684.689 + 243.588 + 261.173 + 270.012 + 274.082) / 5 = zł346.7088 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was zł684.7 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł63.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł211.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł174.8 Mil.
Net Income was -8.148 + -3.737 + -12.487 + -17.175 = zł-41.5 Mil.

Revenue was 77.465 + 88.848 + 96.39 + 75.832 = zł338.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was 42.735 + 49.469 + 65.88 + 38.504 = zł196.6 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(649.226 + 644.334 + 658.073 + 615.435 + 684.689) / 5 = zł650.3514 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was zł649.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł32.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł185.9 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł738.0 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Columbus Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was 129.3. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Columbus Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -40.6. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=129.318/684.689
=0.18887115

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-41.547/649.226
=-0.06399466

Columbus Energy's return on assets of this year was 0.18887115. Columbus Energy's return on assets of last year was -0.06399466. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Columbus Energy's current Net Income (TTM) was 129.3. Columbus Energy's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -40.6. ==> -40.6 <= 129.3 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=63.504/346.7088
=0.18316235

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=32.512/650.3514
=0.04999144

Columbus Energy's gearing of this year was 0.18316235. Columbus Energy's gearing of last year was 0.04999144. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=211.451/174.793
=1.20972236

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=185.945/737.976
=0.25196619

Columbus Energy's current ratio of this year was 1.20972236. Columbus Energy's current ratio of last year was 0.25196619. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Columbus Energy's number of shares in issue this year was 68.774. Columbus Energy's number of shares in issue last year was 68.774. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=139.116/283.94
=0.48994858

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=196.588/338.535
=0.58070214

Columbus Energy's gross margin of this year was 0.48994858. Columbus Energy's gross margin of last year was 0.58070214. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=283.94/684.689
=0.41469923

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=338.535/649.226
=0.521444

Columbus Energy's asset turnover of this year was 0.41469923. Columbus Energy's asset turnover of last year was 0.521444. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+0+1+1+0+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Columbus Energy has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Columbus Energy (WAR:CLC) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jul. 01, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Columbus Energy and its competitors. This is 20% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Columbus Energy's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Columbus Energy ranks #597 out of 989 companies in the Semiconductors industry, placing it in the top 60.4%.
Is Columbus Energy's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Columbus Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 8.00. The Semiconductors industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Columbus Energy's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Columbus Energy ranks #597 out of 989 companies in the Semiconductors industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Columbus Energy has a GF Score™ of 49/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Columbus Energy's Piotroski F-Score compare to FSLR and NXT?
According to the Semiconductors industry distribution chart, Columbus Energy ranks #597 out of 989 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Columbus Energy in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Columbus Energy's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Columbus Energy's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Columbus Energy has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Semiconductors company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Semiconductors companies is 5.00, based on 989 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Columbus Energy's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Columbus Energy and its competitors. For the Semiconductors industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Columbus Energy's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Columbus Energy stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Columbus Energy (WAR:CLC) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is zł4.18, compared to a current price of zł2.72 — trading 34.9% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% below the Semiconductors industry median of 5.00. Columbus Energy's overall GF Score™ is 49/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Columbus Energy (WAR:CLC), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jul. 01, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Columbus Energy (WAR:CLC) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Columbus Energy stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of zł2.72 is trading 34.9% below its estimated GF Value™ of zł4.18. GuruFocus considers Columbus Energy to be Possible Value Trap.

Key valuation signals for WAR:CLC:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: zł4.18 vs. price of zł2.72 (34.9% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 49/100 with 7 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Semiconductors median (#597 of 989)

No single metric tells the full story. See the WAR:CLC stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Columbus Energy Business Description

Address ul. Forge Kollatajowskiej 13, Krakow, POL, 40-005
Columbus Energy SA is a Poland based company involved in providing energy efficiency services. Its products include photovoltaic systems, that convert solar radiation into electricity.
49GF Score

Get the complete analysis for WAR:CLC

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł2.72
Price
zł4.18
GF Value