Feerum (WAR:FEE) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — Near Median


WAR:FEE Feerum SA WAR:FEE
62 GF Score
Price zł17.00
GF Value zł10.78
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Feerum Piotroski F-Score?

Feerum WAR:FEE +1.19% 62 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates WAR:FEE with a GF Score™ of 62/100 and a GF Value™ of zł10.78 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 207 Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies, Feerum ranks better than 78.74% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Feerum has an F-score of 8. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Feerum's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:FEE' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Feerum was 9. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.

Feerum  (WAR:FEE) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Feerum Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Feerum Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Feerum's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Feerum Piotroski F-Score Chart

Feerum Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 7.00 5.00 6.00 0.00

Feerum Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 7.00 7.00 0.00 6.00

WAR:FEE vs CAT, DE, PCAR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery subindustry, Feerum's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Feerum Piotroski F-Score vs Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery Industry

For the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery industry and Industrials sector, Feerum's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Feerum's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


WAR:FEE
62GF Score
Feerum SA WAR:FEE
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 1.585 + 4.458 + 4.904 + 3.296 = zł14.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -3.58 + 8.88 + 22.653 + -11.326 = zł16.6 Mil.
Revenue was 32.567 + 32.589 + 33.613 + 36.596 = zł135.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 4.674 + 7.529 + 9.234 + 5.093 = zł26.5 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(157.74 + 180.765 + 163.052 + 178.461 + 188.613) / 5 = zł173.7262 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was zł157.7 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł0.1 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł131.9 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł54.6 Mil.
Net Income was 0.012 + 0.289 + -2.52 + 1.296 = zł-0.9 Mil.

Revenue was 16.93 + 21.165 + 23.674 + 26.631 = zł88.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.431 + 2.784 + -0.877 + 4.567 = zł8.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(153.369 + 150.099 + 149.096 + 142.714 + 157.74) / 5 = zł150.6036 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was zł153.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł0.1 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł96.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł36.1 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Feerum's current Net Income (TTM) was 14.2. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Feerum's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 16.6. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=14.243/157.74
=0.09029415

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-0.923/153.369
=-0.00601817

Feerum's return on assets of this year was 0.09029415. Feerum's return on assets of last year was -0.00601817. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Feerum's current Net Income (TTM) was 14.2. Feerum's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 16.6. ==> 16.6 > 14.2 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0.092/173.7262
=0.00052957

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0.138/150.6036
=0.00091631

Feerum's gearing of this year was 0.00052957. Feerum's gearing of last year was 0.00091631. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=131.88/54.55
=2.41759853

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=96.453/36.073
=2.67382807

Feerum's current ratio of this year was 2.41759853. Feerum's current ratio of last year was 2.67382807. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Feerum's number of shares in issue this year was 9.538. Feerum's number of shares in issue last year was 9.538. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=26.53/135.365
=0.19598862

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=8.905/88.4
=0.10073529

Feerum's gross margin of this year was 0.19598862. Feerum's gross margin of last year was 0.10073529. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=135.365/157.74
=0.85815266

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=88.4/153.369
=0.57638767

Feerum's asset turnover of this year was 0.85815266. Feerum's asset turnover of last year was 0.57638767. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+0+1+1+1
=8

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Feerum has an F-score of 8. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
Feerum (WAR:FEE) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Feerum and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Feerum's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Feerum ranks #44 out of 207 companies in the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery industry, placing it in the top 21.3%.
Is Feerum's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Feerum's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is near median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 9.00. The Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Feerum's value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Feerum ranks #44 out of 207 companies in the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Feerum has a GF Score™ of 62/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Feerum's Piotroski F-Score compare to CAT and DE?
According to the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery industry distribution chart, Feerum ranks #44 out of 207 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Feerum in the top 21% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Feerum's value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, Feerum's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Feerum has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery companies is 5.00, based on 207 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Feerum's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Feerum and its competitors. For the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Feerum's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is near median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Feerum stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Feerum (WAR:FEE) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is zł10.78, compared to a current price of zł17.00 — trading 57.7% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is near median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 20% above the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery industry median of 5.00. Feerum's overall GF Score™ is 62/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Feerum (WAR:FEE), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Feerum (WAR:FEE) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Feerum stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of zł17.00 is trading 57.7% above its estimated GF Value™ of zł10.78. GuruFocus considers Feerum to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for WAR:FEE:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 6 (near median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: zł10.78 vs. price of zł17.00 (57.7% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 62/100 with 7 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% above the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery median (#44 of 207)

No single metric tells the full story. See the WAR:FEE stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Feerum Business Description

Address Ulica Okrzei 6, Chojnow, POL, 59-225
Feerum SA is a producer of comprehensive grain elevators which are designed for drying and storage of plant products such as grain, oily and legume plants, corn and other. The company is a manufacturer of a wide range of dryers, cleaners, silos and flat warehouses as well as reliable grain transport systems.
62GF Score

Get the complete analysis for WAR:FEE

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł17.00
Price
zł10.78
GF Value