IMS (WAR:IMS) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — 33% Below Median


WAR:IMS IMS SA WAR:IMS
77 GF Score
Price zł2.18
GF Value zł3.83
Valuation Significantly Undervalued
! 8 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is IMS Piotroski F-Score?

IMS WAR:IMS -0.23% 77 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is 33% below its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates WAR:IMS with a GF Score™ of 77/100 and a GF Value™ of zł3.83 (Significantly Undervalued). The stock has 8 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,015 Media - Diversified companies, IMS ranks worse than 59.31% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

IMS has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for IMS's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:IMS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of IMS was 9. The lowest was 3. And the median was 6.

IMS  (WAR:IMS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


IMS Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


IMS Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for IMS's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

IMS Piotroski F-Score Chart

IMS Annual Data
Trend Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 7.00

IMS Quarterly Data
Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00

WAR:IMS vs APP, OMC, TTD: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Advertising Agencies subindustry, IMS's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


IMS Piotroski F-Score vs Media - Diversified Industry

For the Media - Diversified industry and Communication Services sector, IMS's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where IMS's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


WAR:IMS
77GF Score
IMS SA WAR:IMS
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was 1.029 + 1.666 + 1.677 + 0.957 = zł5.33 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 2.828 + -0.028 + 7.883 + 2.907 = zł13.59 Mil.
Revenue was 14.266 + 16.288 + 15.586 + 15.849 = zł61.99 Mil.
Gross Profit was 13.437 + 14.969 + 14.425 + 15.139 = zł57.97 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(90.364 + 94.29 + 97.07 + 94.546 + 97.53) / 5 = zł94.76 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was zł90.36 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł9.12 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł19.82 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł33.38 Mil.
Net Income was 2.131 + 2.741 + 2.24 + 3.948 = zł11.06 Mil.

Revenue was 14.032 + 15.722 + 16.278 + 20.356 = zł66.39 Mil.
Gross Profit was 12.476 + 14.131 + 14.658 + 18.062 = zł59.33 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was
(88.569 + 79.688 + 84.424 + 89.556 + 90.364) / 5 = zł86.5202 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was zł88.57 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł6.94 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł23.14 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł29.05 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

IMS's current Net Income (TTM) was 5.33. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

IMS's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 13.59. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=5.329/90.364
=0.0589726

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=11.06/88.569
=0.12487439

IMS's return on assets of this year was 0.0589726. IMS's return on assets of last year was 0.12487439. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

IMS's current Net Income (TTM) was 5.33. IMS's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 13.59. ==> 13.59 > 5.33 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Mar26
=9.116/94.76
=0.09620093

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=6.944/86.5202
=0.08025871

IMS's gearing of this year was 0.09620093. IMS's gearing of last year was 0.08025871. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=19.824/33.383
=0.59383519

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=23.136/29.048
=0.7964748

IMS's current ratio of this year was 0.59383519. IMS's current ratio of last year was 0.7964748. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

IMS's number of shares in issue this year was 34.469. IMS's number of shares in issue last year was 32.667. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=57.97/61.989
=0.93516592

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=59.327/66.388
=0.89364042

IMS's gross margin of this year was 0.93516592. IMS's gross margin of last year was 0.89364042. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=61.989/90.364
=0.68599221

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=66.388/88.569
=0.74956249

IMS's asset turnover of this year was 0.68599221. IMS's asset turnover of last year was 0.74956249. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+0+0+0+1+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

IMS has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
IMS (WAR:IMS) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on IMS and its competitors. This is 33% below median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, IMS's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, IMS ranks #602 out of 1015 companies in the Media - Diversified industry, placing it in the top 59.3%.
Is IMS's Piotroski F-Score too high?
IMS's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 9.00. The Media - Diversified industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. IMS's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, IMS ranks #602 out of 1015 companies in the Media - Diversified industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, IMS has a GF Score™ of 77/100 and is considered Significantly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does IMS's Piotroski F-Score compare to APP and OMC?
According to the Media - Diversified industry distribution chart, IMS ranks #602 out of 1015 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places IMS in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. IMS's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, IMS's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, IMS has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Media - Diversified company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Media - Diversified companies is 5.00, based on 1,015 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. IMS's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on IMS and its competitors. For the Media - Diversified industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. IMS's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% below median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is IMS stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, IMS (WAR:IMS) is currently considered Significantly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is zł3.83, compared to a current price of zł2.18 — trading 43.1% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 20% below the Media - Diversified industry median of 5.00. IMS's overall GF Score™ is 77/100 with 8 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For IMS (WAR:IMS), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is IMS (WAR:IMS) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, IMS stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of zł2.18 is trading 43.1% below its estimated GF Value™ of zł3.83. GuruFocus considers IMS to be Significantly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for WAR:IMS:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: zł3.83 vs. price of zł2.18 (43.1% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 77/100 with 8 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Media - Diversified median (#602 of 1015)

No single metric tells the full story. See the WAR:IMS stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


IMS Business Description

Address Ulica Pu?awska 366, Warsaw, POL, 02-819
IMS SA offers sensory marketing services in Poland. The company operates in the media and modern technology segment. The company's services include Audio marketing, Digital Signage, Scent marketing, Event marketing, Technology and development for sensory marketing.
77GF Score

Get the complete analysis for WAR:IMS

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł2.18
Price
zł3.83
GF Value