Private Rented Sector (WAR:RNT) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — Near Median


WAR:RNT Private Rented Sector SA WAR:RNT
11 GF Score
Price zł5.50
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Private Rented Sector Piotroski F-Score?

Private Rented Sector WAR:RNT 11 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates WAR:RNT with a GF Score™ of 11/100. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Private Rented Sector has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:RNT' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 6
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Private Rented Sector was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Private Rented Sector  (WAR:RNT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Private Rented Sector Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Private Rented Sector Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Private Rented Sector Piotroski F-Score Chart

Private Rented Sector Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 4.00 6.00 4.00 3.00

Private Rented Sector Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

WAR:RNT vs VRTX, REGN, ALNY: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Biotechnology subindustry, Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Private Rented Sector Piotroski F-Score vs Biotechnology Industry

For the Biotechnology industry and Healthcare sector, Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


WAR:RNT
11GF Score
Private Rented Sector SA WAR:RNT
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.082 + -0.007 + -0.036 + -0.016 = zł-0.14 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.118 + -0.09 + 0.072 + -0.012 = zł0.09 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0.019 + 0 = zł0.02 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0.018 + 0 = zł0.02 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(2.048 + 2.014 + 2.469 + 2.552 + 2.672) / 5 = zł2.351 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was zł2.05 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł1.35 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł1.98 Mil.
Net Income was -0.031 + -0.02 + 0.008 + -0.186 = zł-0.23 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0.107 + 0.008 = zł0.12 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0.107 + 0.008 = zł0.12 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(0.239 + 0.284 + 0.996 + 1.384 + 2.048) / 5 = zł0.9902 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was zł0.24 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł1.15 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł1.04 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Private Rented Sector's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.14. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Private Rented Sector's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.09. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-0.141/2.048
=-0.06884766

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-0.229/0.239
=-0.958159

Private Rented Sector's return on assets of this year was -0.06884766. Private Rented Sector's return on assets of last year was -0.958159. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Private Rented Sector's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.14. Private Rented Sector's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.09. ==> 0.09 > -0.14 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0/2.351
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/0.9902
=0

Private Rented Sector's gearing of this year was 0. Private Rented Sector's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1.35/1.977
=0.68285281

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1.151/1.042
=1.10460653

Private Rented Sector's current ratio of this year was 0.68285281. Private Rented Sector's current ratio of last year was 1.10460653. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Private Rented Sector's number of shares in issue this year was 1.366. Private Rented Sector's number of shares in issue last year was 1.321. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.018/0.019
=0.94736842

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.115/0.115
=1

Private Rented Sector's gross margin of this year was 0.94736842. Private Rented Sector's gross margin of last year was 1. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0.019/2.048
=0.00927734

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=0.115/0.239
=0.48117155

Private Rented Sector's asset turnover of this year was 0.00927734. Private Rented Sector's asset turnover of last year was 0.48117155. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+1+1+1+0+0+0+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Private Rented Sector has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Private Rented Sector (WAR:RNT) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Private Rented Sector and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00.
Is Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Private Rented Sector's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 6.00. The Biotechnology industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Private Rented Sector's value of 4 is 33.3% above this industry median. Overall, Private Rented Sector has a GF Score™ of 11/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score compare to VRTX and REGN?
Private Rented Sector's Piotroski F-Score of 4 can be compared against companies in the Biotechnology industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00. Private Rented Sector's value of 4 is 33.3% above this benchmark. Historically, Private Rented Sector's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 3.00, Private Rented Sector has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Biotechnology company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Biotechnology companies is 3.00, based on 1,342 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Private Rented Sector's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 33.3% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Private Rented Sector and its competitors. For the Biotechnology industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 3.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Private Rented Sector's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Private Rented Sector stock overvalued right now?
Private Rented Sector (WAR:RNT) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 33.3% above the Biotechnology industry median of 3.00. Private Rented Sector's overall GF Score™ is 11/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Private Rented Sector (WAR:RNT), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Private Rented Sector Business Description

Address ul. Kopanina 59, Poznan, POL, 60-105
Private Rented Sector SA researches and develops proprietary process that can be manufactured to support the shortage of Technetium-99 in nuclear medicine. The company has developed Micro-Porous Composite Material.
11GF Score

Get the complete analysis for WAR:RNT

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł5.50
Price