NameSilo Technologies (XCNQ:URL) Piotroski F-Score: 7 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 17% Above Median


XCNQ:URL NameSilo Technologies Corp XCNQ:URL
56 GF Score
Price C$1.43
GF Value C$0.58
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is NameSilo Technologies Piotroski F-Score?

NameSilo Technologies XCNQ:URL -0.69% 56 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 17% above its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates XCNQ:URL with a GF Score™ of 56/100 and a GF Value™ of C$0.58 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,743 Software companies, NameSilo Technologies ranks better than 91.91% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NameSilo Technologies has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for NameSilo Technologies's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

XCNQ:URL' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of NameSilo Technologies was 9. The lowest was 1. And the median was 6.

NameSilo Technologies  (XCNQ:URL) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


NameSilo Technologies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


NameSilo Technologies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for NameSilo Technologies's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

NameSilo Technologies Piotroski F-Score Chart

NameSilo Technologies Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 7.00 6.00 9.00

NameSilo Technologies Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 9.00 7.00 9.00 7.00

XCNQ:URL vs CRM, SHOP, UBER: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Application subindustry, NameSilo Technologies's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


NameSilo Technologies Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, NameSilo Technologies's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where NameSilo Technologies's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


XCNQ:URL
56GF Score
NameSilo Technologies Corp XCNQ:URL
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 0.806 + 0.653 + -1.691 + 0.542 = C$0.31 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 1.775 + 1.845 + 3.678 + 1.517 = C$8.82 Mil.
Revenue was 16.132 + 16.921 + 16.557 + 16.983 = C$66.59 Mil.
Gross Profit was 4.122 + 4.461 + 4.031 + 4.3 = C$16.91 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(49.063 + 48.487 + 50.927 + 52.289 + 59.978) / 5 = C$52.1488 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was C$49.06 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.07 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$36.43 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$51.01 Mil.
Net Income was 0.009 + 0.25 + -1.565 + 1.184 = C$-0.12 Mil.

Revenue was 13.176 + 14.351 + 14.904 + 15.873 = C$58.30 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.884 + 3.215 + 3.32 + 4.132 = C$13.55 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(43.69 + 46.094 + 46.729 + 46.156 + 49.063) / 5 = C$46.3464 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was C$43.69 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$32.58 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$45.91 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NameSilo Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.31. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NameSilo Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 8.82. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=0.31/49.063
=0.00631841

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-0.122/43.69
=-0.0027924

NameSilo Technologies's return on assets of this year was 0.00631841. NameSilo Technologies's return on assets of last year was -0.0027924. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

NameSilo Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.31. NameSilo Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 8.82. ==> 8.82 > 0.31 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0.066/52.1488
=0.00126561

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/46.3464
=0

NameSilo Technologies's gearing of this year was 0.00126561. NameSilo Technologies's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=36.428/51.008
=0.71416248

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=32.576/45.906
=0.70962401

NameSilo Technologies's current ratio of this year was 0.71416248. NameSilo Technologies's current ratio of last year was 0.70962401. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

NameSilo Technologies's number of shares in issue this year was 94.534. NameSilo Technologies's number of shares in issue last year was 92.772. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=16.914/66.593
=0.25399066

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=13.551/58.304
=0.23241973

NameSilo Technologies's gross margin of this year was 0.25399066. NameSilo Technologies's gross margin of last year was 0.23241973. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=66.593/49.063
=1.35729572

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=58.304/43.69
=1.33449302

NameSilo Technologies's asset turnover of this year was 1.35729572. NameSilo Technologies's asset turnover of last year was 1.33449302. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+0+1+0+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NameSilo Technologies has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 7 mean?
NameSilo Technologies (XCNQ:URL) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on NameSilo Technologies and its competitors. This is 17% above median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, NameSilo Technologies' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 9.00. According to the industry distribution chart, NameSilo Technologies ranks #222 out of 2743 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 8.1%.
Is NameSilo Technologies' Piotroski F-Score too high?
NameSilo Technologies' current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 9.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. NameSilo Technologies' value of 7 is 40% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, NameSilo Technologies ranks #222 out of 2743 companies in the Software industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, NameSilo Technologies has a GF Score™ of 56/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does NameSilo Technologies' Piotroski F-Score compare to CRM and SHOP?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, NameSilo Technologies ranks #222 out of 2743 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places NameSilo Technologies in the top 8% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. NameSilo Technologies' value of 7 is 40% above this benchmark. Historically, NameSilo Technologies' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 9.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, NameSilo Technologies has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,743 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. NameSilo Technologies's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on NameSilo Technologies and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. NameSilo Technologies's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is NameSilo Technologies stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, NameSilo Technologies (XCNQ:URL) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is C$0.58, compared to a current price of C$1.43 — trading 146.6% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 40% above the Software industry median of 5.00. NameSilo Technologies' overall GF Score™ is 56/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For NameSilo Technologies (XCNQ:URL), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is NameSilo Technologies (XCNQ:URL) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, NameSilo Technologies stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of C$1.43 is trading 146.6% above its estimated GF Value™ of C$0.58. GuruFocus considers NameSilo Technologies to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for XCNQ:URL:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 7 (17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: C$0.58 vs. price of C$1.43 (146.6% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 56/100 with 3 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% above the Software median (#222 of 2743)

No single metric tells the full story. See the XCNQ:URL stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


NameSilo Technologies Business Description

Other Exchanges URLOF:USA
Address 1100 - 1199 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, CAN, V6E 3T5
NameSilo Technologies Corp is a provider of domain name registration services and marketplace services for the buying and selling of domain names. The company also provides web services like hosting, SSL, email, and premium DNS. I two reportable segments, domain registration and related services, and infrastructure condition assessment and pipeline inspection. The company's corporate segment and SewerVUE which provides infrastructure condition assessment and pipeline inspection are located in Canada, and NameSilo LLC which provides domain registration and related services is located in the USA. The company's revenues are derived from domain name registration fees, marketplace transactions and the sale of domain names.
56GF Score

Get the complete analysis for XCNQ:URL

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

C$1.43
Price
C$0.58
GF Value