CFPI (California Style Palms) Beneish M-Score: 0.00 (As of Sep. 10, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is California Style Palms Beneish M-Score?

California Style Palms CFPI Beneish M-Score is 0.00 as of Sep. 10, 2026.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for California Style Palms's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

During the past 8 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of California Style Palms was 0.00. The lowest was 0.00. And the median was 0.00.

California Style Palms Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for California Style Palms's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

California Style Palms Beneish M-Score Chart

California Style Palms Annual Data
Trend Jan97 Jan98 Jan99 Jan00 Jan01 Jan02 Jan03 Mar05
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.83 -4.23

California Style Palms Quarterly Data
Jul00 Oct00 Jan01 Apr01 Jul01 Oct01 Jan02 Apr02 Jul02 Oct02 Jan03 Apr03 Dec04 Mar05 Jun05 Sep05 Dec05 Mar06 Jun06 Sep06
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -5.62 -10.26 -17.18 -14.18 -18.57

CFPI vs BYIN: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Farm Products subindustry, California Style Palms's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.

California Style Palms Beneish M-Score vs Consumer Packaged Goods Industry

For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, California Style Palms's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where California Style Palms's Beneish M-Score falls into.


California Style Palms Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of California Style Palms for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 0.1014+0.528 * 1.1803+0.404 * 19.8732+0.892 * 1.1333+0.115 * 0.6411
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.3753+4.679 * -4.228589-0.327 * 4.8634
=-16.62

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep06) TTM:Last Year (Sep05) TTM:
Total Receivables was $0.10 Mil.
Revenue was 3.573 + 4.784 + 6.775 + 8.91 = $24.04 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1.717 + 2.104 + 0.777 + 2.679 = $7.28 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2.22 Mil.
Total Assets was $3.18 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $0.25 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.08 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $24.53 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $24.71 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Net Income was -4.512 + -3.134 + -5.482 + -3.881 = $-17.01 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + -0.607 = $-0.61 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.032 + -0.732 + -2.215 + 0.007 = $-2.97 Mil.
 Total Receivables was $0.87 Mil.
Revenue was 6.339 + 5.31 + 5.529 + 4.037 = $21.22 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.242 + 1.86 + 2.067 + 1.41 = $7.58 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $8.22 Mil.
Total Assets was $8.53 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $0.21 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.04 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $15.74 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $13.39 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.25 Mil.

1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(0.1 / 24.042) / (0.87 / 21.215)
=0.004159 / 0.041009
=0.1014

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(7.579 / 21.215) / (7.277 / 24.042)
=0.357247 / 0.302679
=1.1803

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (2.222 + 0.251) / 3.176) / (1 - (8.222 + 0.212) / 8.529)
=0.221348 / 0.011138
=19.8732

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=24.042 / 21.215
=1.1333

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(0.038 / (0.038 + 0.212)) / (0.078 / (0.078 + 0.251))
=0.152 / 0.237082
=0.6411

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(24.533 / 24.042) / (15.741 / 21.215)
=1.020423 / 0.741975
=1.3753

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((0 + 24.706) / 3.176) / ((0.25 + 13.392) / 8.529)
=7.778967 / 1.599484
=4.8634

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(-17.009 - -0.607 - -2.972) / 3.176
=-4.228589

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

California Style Palms has a M-score of -16.62 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of 0.00 mean?
California Style Palms (CFPI) has a Beneish M-Score of 0.00 as of Sep. 10, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on California Style Palms and its competitors.
Is California Style Palms' Beneish M-Score too high?
California Style Palms' current Beneish M-Score is 0.00.
How does California Style Palms' Beneish M-Score compare to BYIN?
California Style Palms' Beneish M-Score of 0.00 can be compared against companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Consumer Packaged Goods company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Consumer Packaged Goods industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on California Style Palms and its competitors. California Style Palms's current Beneish M-Score is 0.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is California Style Palms stock overvalued right now?
California Style Palms (CFPI) has a current Beneish M-Score of 0.00. The current Beneish M-Score is 0.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For California Style Palms (CFPI), the current Beneish M-Score is 0.00 as of Sep. 10, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

California Style Palms Business Description

Address 349 North Renee Street, Orange, CA, USA, 92869-3122
California Style Palms Inc is engaged in selling and installation of decorative palm trees. It owns and operates the assets, with the exception of the real estate, of Gregory Palm Farms, LLC, a fourth-generation farmers company who live to grow its own products. The company owns and operates two farms in California, and have set up central location in Orange, Orange County. It derives revenues primarily from the sale and installation of decorative palm trees.