Cadence Design Systems (FRA:CDS) Beneish M-Score: -1.80 (As of Jun. 26, 2026)


FRA:CDS Cadence Design Systems Inc FRA:CDS
99 GF Score
Price €322.55
GF Value €324.68
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 4 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Cadence Design Systems Beneish M-Score?

Cadence Design Systems FRA:CDS -1.92% 99 Beneish M-Score is -1.80 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus rates FRA:CDS with a GF Score™ of 99/100 and a GF Value™ of €324.68 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,634 Software companies, Cadence Design Systems ranks worse than 80.49% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -1.8 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Cadence Design Systems's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

FRA:CDS' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.12   Med: -2.67   Max: -1.8
Current: -1.8

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Cadence Design Systems was -1.80. The lowest was -3.12. And the median was -2.67.


Cadence Design Systems Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Cadence Design Systems's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Cadence Design Systems Beneish M-Score Chart

Cadence Design Systems Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.92 -2.48 -2.69 -2.40 -2.38

Cadence Design Systems Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.43 -2.70 -2.32 -2.38 -1.80

FRA:CDS vs ADBE, INTU, ADP: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Software - Application subindustry, Cadence Design Systems's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Cadence Design Systems Beneish M-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Cadence Design Systems's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Cadence Design Systems's Beneish M-Score falls into.


FRA:CDS
99GF Score
Cadence Design Systems Inc FRA:CDS
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Cadence Design Systems Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Cadence Design Systems for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 1.5848+0.528 * 0.9972+0.404 * 1.3726+0.892 * 1.0501+0.115 * 0.9341
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 0.968+4.679 * -0.026864-0.327 * 0.9507
=-1.86

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Total Receivables was €894 Mil.
Revenue was 1275.2 + 1229.857 + 1140.69 + 1105.807 = €4,752 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1089.628 + 1068.685 + 985.462 + 946.135 = €4,090 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €2,751 Mil.
Total Assets was €10,465 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was €464 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was €229 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was €988 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €1,871 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €2,299 Mil.
Net Income was 290.346 + 331.468 + 244.628 + 138.764 = €1,005 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 8.76 + 27.71 + -47.365 + -75.266 = €-86 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 307.751 + 472.685 + 264.684 + 327.382 = €1,373 Mil.
Total Receivables was €537 Mil.
Revenue was 1149.189 + 1294.962 + 1095.165 + 985.373 = €4,525 Mil.
Gross Profit was 994.565 + 1084.917 + 948.256 + 855.991 = €3,884 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €3,698 Mil.
Total Assets was €8,337 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was €431 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was €193 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was €972 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €1,203 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €2,291 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(894.249 / 4751.554) / (537.32 / 4524.689)
=0.188201 / 0.118753
=1.5848

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(3883.729 / 4524.689) / (4089.91 / 4751.554)
=0.858342 / 0.860752
=0.9972

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (2751.046 + 464.421) / 10465.076) / (1 - (3698.23 + 431.348) / 8337.475)
=0.692743 / 0.504697
=1.3726

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=4751.554 / 4524.689
=1.0501

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(192.733 / (192.733 + 431.348)) / (229.369 / (229.369 + 464.421))
=0.308827 / 0.330603
=0.9341

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(988.296 / 4751.554) / (972.189 / 4524.689)
=0.207994 / 0.214863
=0.968

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((2299.476 + 1870.569) / 10465.076) / ((2291.372 + 1203.209) / 8337.475)
=0.398473 / 0.419141
=0.9507

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(1005.206 - -86.161 - 1372.502) / 10465.076
=-0.026864

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Cadence Design Systems has a M-score of -1.86 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -1.80 mean?
Cadence Design Systems (FRA:CDS) has a Beneish M-Score of -1.80 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Cadence Design Systems and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Cadence Design Systems ranks #2120 out of 2634 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 80.5%.
Is Cadence Design Systems' Beneish M-Score too high?
Cadence Design Systems' current Beneish M-Score is -1.80. Based on the distribution chart, Cadence Design Systems ranks #2120 out of 2634 companies in the Software industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Cadence Design Systems has a GF Score™ of 99/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Cadence Design Systems' Beneish M-Score compare to ADBE and INTU?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Cadence Design Systems ranks #2120 out of 2634 companies for Beneish M-Score. This places Cadence Design Systems in the lower half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Software company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Software industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Cadence Design Systems and its competitors. Cadence Design Systems's current Beneish M-Score is -1.80. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Cadence Design Systems stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Cadence Design Systems (FRA:CDS) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is €324.68, compared to a current price of €322.55 — trading 0.7% below its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -1.80. Cadence Design Systems' overall GF Score™ is 99/100 with 4 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Cadence Design Systems (FRA:CDS), the current Beneish M-Score is -1.80 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Cadence Design Systems (FRA:CDS) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Cadence Design Systems stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of €322.55 is trading 0.7% below its estimated GF Value™ of €324.68. GuruFocus considers Cadence Design Systems to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for FRA:CDS:

  • Beneish M-Score: -1.80
  • GF Value™: €324.68 vs. price of €322.55 (0.7% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 99/100 with 4 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the FRA:CDS stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Cadence Design Systems Business Description

Address 2655 Seely Avenue, Building 5, San Jose, CA, USA, 95134
Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates and aids in the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enables system-level analysis and verification solutions.
99GF Score

Get the complete analysis for FRA:CDS

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

€322.55
Price
€324.68
GF Value