Panasonic Holdings (FRA:MAT1) Beneish M-Score: -2.62 (As of Jun. 24, 2026)


FRA:MAT1 Panasonic Holdings Corp FRA:MAT1
60 GF Score
Price €22.90
GF Value €7.91
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 12 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Panasonic Holdings Beneish M-Score?

Panasonic Holdings FRA:MAT1 -5.20% 60 Beneish M-Score is -2.62 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus rates FRA:MAT1 with a GF Score™ of 60/100 and a GF Value™ of €7.91 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 12 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,403 Hardware companies, Panasonic Holdings ranks better than 62.51% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -2.62 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Panasonic Holdings's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

FRA:MAT1' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.77   Med: -2.58   Max: -2.19
Current: -2.62

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Panasonic Holdings was -2.19. The lowest was -2.77. And the median was -2.58.


Panasonic Holdings Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Panasonic Holdings's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Panasonic Holdings Beneish M-Score Chart

Panasonic Holdings Annual Data
Trend Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.19 -2.54 -2.66 -2.70 -2.62

Panasonic Holdings Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.70 -2.72 -2.62 -2.62 -2.62

FRA:MAT1 vs AAPL: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Consumer Electronics subindustry, Panasonic Holdings's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Panasonic Holdings Beneish M-Score vs Hardware Industry

For the Hardware industry and Technology sector, Panasonic Holdings's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Panasonic Holdings's Beneish M-Score falls into.


FRA:MAT1
60GF Score
Panasonic Holdings Corp FRA:MAT1
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Panasonic Holdings Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Panasonic Holdings for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 1.0512+0.528 * 0.9904+0.404 * 0.985+0.892 * 0.876+0.115 * 1.0771
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.0123+4.679 * -0.044143-0.327 * 0.9805
=-2.75

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Total Receivables was €7,521 Mil.
Revenue was 11801.38 + 11301.425 + 11085.031 + 11381.446 = €45,569 Mil.
Gross Profit was 3578.067 + 3725.881 + 3379.422 + 3622.92 = €14,306 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €21,149 Mil.
Total Assets was €55,451 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was €13,582 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was €2,292 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was €11,785 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €16,348 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €7,407 Mil.
Net Income was 350.197 + -93.701 + 408.769 + 428.827 = €1,094 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = €0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 1155.138 + 624.22 + 680.221 + 1082.32 = €3,542 Mil.
Total Receivables was €8,168 Mil.
Revenue was 12748.202 + 13364.951 + 13422.419 + 12486.058 = €52,022 Mil.
Gross Profit was 4044.306 + 4326.505 + 4089.858 + 3714.376 = €16,175 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €22,436 Mil.
Total Assets was €57,981 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was €13,549 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was €2,495 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was €13,290 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €16,648 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €8,684 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(7521.196 / 45569.282) / (8167.709 / 52021.63)
=0.16505 / 0.157006
=1.0512

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(16175.045 / 52021.63) / (14306.29 / 45569.282)
=0.310929 / 0.313946
=0.9904

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (21149.413 + 13582.155) / 55451.139) / (1 - (22436.414 + 13549.451) / 57980.617)
=0.373655 / 0.379347
=0.985

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=45569.282 / 52021.63
=0.876

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(2494.939 / (2494.939 + 13549.451)) / (2291.645 / (2291.645 + 13582.155))
=0.155502 / 0.144367
=1.0771

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(11784.674 / 45569.282) / (13290.342 / 52021.63)
=0.25861 / 0.255477
=1.0123

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((7407.333 + 16347.775) / 55451.139) / ((8683.709 + 16648.239) / 57980.617)
=0.428397 / 0.436904
=0.9805

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(1094.092 - 0 - 3541.899) / 55451.139
=-0.044143

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Panasonic Holdings has a M-score of -2.75 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -2.62 mean?
Panasonic Holdings (FRA:MAT1) has a Beneish M-Score of -2.62 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Panasonic Holdings and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Panasonic Holdings ranks #901 out of 2403 companies in the Hardware industry, placing it in the top 37.5%.
Is Panasonic Holdings' Beneish M-Score too high?
Panasonic Holdings' current Beneish M-Score is -2.62. Based on the distribution chart, Panasonic Holdings ranks #901 out of 2403 companies in the Hardware industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Panasonic Holdings has a GF Score™ of 60/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Panasonic Holdings' Beneish M-Score compare to AAPL?
According to the Hardware industry distribution chart, Panasonic Holdings ranks #901 out of 2403 companies for Beneish M-Score. This puts Panasonic Holdings in the upper half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Hardware company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Hardware industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Panasonic Holdings and its competitors. Panasonic Holdings's current Beneish M-Score is -2.62. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Panasonic Holdings stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Panasonic Holdings (FRA:MAT1) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is €7.91, compared to a current price of €22.90 — trading 189.4% above its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -2.62. Panasonic Holdings' overall GF Score™ is 60/100 with 12 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Panasonic Holdings (FRA:MAT1), the current Beneish M-Score is -2.62 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Panasonic Holdings (FRA:MAT1) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Panasonic Holdings stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of €22.90 is trading 189.4% above its estimated GF Value™ of €7.91. GuruFocus considers Panasonic Holdings to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for FRA:MAT1:

  • Beneish M-Score: -2.62
  • GF Value™: €7.91 vs. price of €22.90 (189.4% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 60/100 with 12 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the FRA:MAT1 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Panasonic Holdings Business Description

Address 1006 Kadoma, Osaka Prefecture, Kadoma, JPN, 571-8501
Panasonic Holdings Corp is engaged in the development, manufacture, and sale of a wide range of electronic and electrical products. The company operates through six segments. The Lifestyle segment provides home appliances such as refrigerators, air conditioners, and beauty and hair care devices. The Automotive segment offers in-vehicle infotainment systems, speaker systems, and advanced driver assistance systems. The Connect segment supplies communication systems, welding machines, and projectors. The Industry segment produces electronic components, motors, and factory automation equipment. The Energy segment develops and sells lithium-ion batteries, dry batteries, and small secondary batteries. The Others segment includes the sale of televisions, cameras, and building materials.
60GF Score

Get the complete analysis for FRA:MAT1

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

€22.90
Price
€7.91
GF Value