GUG (Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund) Beneish M-Score: 0.08 (As of Jul. 27, 2026) — Near Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

GUG Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund GUG
32 GF Score
Price $15.40
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund Beneish M-Score?

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund GUG -0.03% 32 Beneish M-Score is 0.08 as of Jul. 27, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 0.08. GuruFocus rates GUG with a GF Score™ of 32/100. The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 953 Asset Management companies, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund ranks worse than 86.04% on this metric.

Note: Financial institutions were excluded from the sample in Beneish paper when calculating Beneish M-Score. Thus, the prediction might not fit banks and insurance companies.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Warning Sign:

Beneish M-Score 0.08 higher than -1.78, which implies that the company might have manipulated its financial results.

The historical rank and industry rank for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

GUG' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08   Med: 0.08   Max: 0.08
Current: 0.08

During the past 4 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund was 0.08. The lowest was 0.08. And the median was 0.08.

GUG
32GF Score
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund GUG
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 4.1262+0.528 * 1+0.404 * 1+0.892 * 0.6695+0.115 * 1
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.6098+4.679 * 0.018619-0.327 * 1.0223
=0.08

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (May25) TTM:Last Year (May24) TTM:
Total Receivables was $26.83 Mil.
Revenue was $46.97 Mil.
Gross Profit was $46.97 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was $783.58 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $0.00 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.00 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $1.03 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $182.47 Mil.
Net Income was $45.94 Mil.
Gross Profit was $0.00 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $31.35 Mil.
 Total Receivables was $9.71 Mil.
Revenue was $70.16 Mil.
Gross Profit was $70.16 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was $730.57 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $0.00 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.00 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $0.95 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $166.42 Mil.

1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(26.833 / 46.971) / (9.713 / 70.156)
=0.571267 / 0.138449
=4.1262

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(70.156 / 70.156) / (46.971 / 46.971)
=1 / 1
=1

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (0 + 0) / 783.575) / (1 - (0 + 0) / 730.569)
=1 / 1
=1

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=46.971 / 70.156
=0.6695

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(0 / (0 + 0)) / (0 / (0 + 0))
= /
=1

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(1.025 / 46.971) / (0.951 / 70.156)
=0.021822 / 0.013556
=1.6098

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((182.47 + 0) / 783.575) / ((166.421 + 0) / 730.569)
=0.232869 / 0.227796
=1.0223

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(45.942 - 0 - 31.353) / 783.575
=0.018619

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a M-score of 0.08 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of 0.08 mean?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) has a Beneish M-Score of 0.08 as of Jul. 27, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 0.08. Over the past decade, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's Beneish M-Score has ranged from 0.08 to 0.08. According to the industry distribution chart, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund ranks #820 out of 953 companies in the Asset Management industry, placing it in the top 86%.
Is Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's Beneish M-Score too high?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's current Beneish M-Score of 0.08 is near median its 10-year median of 0.08. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 0.08 to a high of 0.08. Based on the distribution chart, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund ranks #820 out of 953 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a GF Score™ of 32/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's Beneish M-Score compare to WIW and BGY?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund ranks #820 out of 953 companies for Beneish M-Score. This places Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund in the lower half of its industry. Historically, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's own Beneish M-Score has ranged from 0.08 to 0.08 over the past decade. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for an Asset Management company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Asset Management industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund and its competitors. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's current Beneish M-Score is 0.08, which is near median its own 10-year median of 0.08. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund stock overvalued right now?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) has a current Beneish M-Score of 0.08. The current Beneish M-Score is 0.08, which is near median its 10-year median of 0.08. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's overall GF Score™ is 32/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG), the current Beneish M-Score is 0.08 as of Jul. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund Business Description

Address 227 West Monroe Street, Chicago, IL, USA, 60606
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is a diversified closed-end management investment company. The fund's investment objective is to maximize total return through a combination of current income and capital appreciation. The company invests in both fixed-income and other debt instruments selected from a variety of sectors and credit qualities, and may also invest in equities. It uses tactical asset allocation models to determine the optimal allocation of its assets between fixed-income and equity securities. A majority of its investments are made in corporate bonds and the rest in senior floating rate interests, asset-backed securities, preferred stocks, and other securities.
32GF Score

Get the complete analysis for GUG

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$15.40
Price