Ulma Construccion Polska (LTS:0O64) Beneish M-Score: -2.19 (As of Aug. 04, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

LTS:0O64 Ulma Construccion Polska SA LTS:0O64
81 GF Score
Price zł59.50
GF Value zł88.03
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Ulma Construccion Polska Beneish M-Score?

Ulma Construccion Polska LTS:0O64 81 Beneish M-Score is -2.19 as of Aug. 04, 2026. GuruFocus rates LTS:0O64 with a GF Score™ of 81/100 and a GF Value™ of zł88.03. The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,021 Business Services companies, Ulma Construccion Polska ranks worse than 73.85% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -2.19 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ulma Construccion Polska's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LTS:0O64' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.74   Med: -2.3   Max: -0.76
Current: -2.19

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Ulma Construccion Polska was -0.76. The lowest was -2.74. And the median was -2.30.


Ulma Construccion Polska Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Ulma Construccion Polska's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Ulma Construccion Polska Beneish M-Score Chart

Ulma Construccion Polska Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.36 -1.36 -2.39 -2.27 -2.41

Ulma Construccion Polska Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.10 -2.17 -2.31 -2.41 -2.19

LTS:0O64 vs URI, SUNB, AER: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Rental & Leasing Services subindustry, Ulma Construccion Polska's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Ulma Construccion Polska Beneish M-Score vs Business Services Industry

For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Ulma Construccion Polska's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Ulma Construccion Polska's Beneish M-Score falls into.


LTS:0O64
81GF Score
Ulma Construccion Polska SA LTS:0O64
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Ulma Construccion Polska Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Ulma Construccion Polska for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 1.0279+0.528 * 1.0351+0.404 * 1.2011+0.892 * 1.0561+0.115 * 0.9361
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 0.9696+4.679 * 0.013481-0.327 * 0.8365
=-2.19

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Total Receivables was zł55.6 Mil.
Revenue was 48.762 + 69.356 + 60.074 + 63.135 = zł241.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was 4.754 + 18.765 + 12.923 + 13.552 = zł50.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł70.1 Mil.
Total Assets was zł416.6 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was zł335.5 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was zł57.5 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was zł28.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł46.6 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł17.3 Mil.
Net Income was -2.926 + 5.736 + 3.834 + 3.46 = zł10.1 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = zł0.0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -1.489 + 11.333 + 0.783 + -6.139 = zł4.5 Mil.
Total Receivables was zł51.2 Mil.
Revenue was 53.065 + 64.88 + 56.882 + 53.685 = zł228.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was 8.77 + 15.279 + 15.003 + 9.949 = zł49.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł72.9 Mil.
Total Assets was zł424.9 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was zł342.7 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was zł54.4 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was zł27.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł59.7 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł18.2 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(55.564 / 241.327) / (51.184 / 228.512)
=0.230244 / 0.223988
=1.0279

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(49.001 / 228.512) / (49.994 / 241.327)
=0.214435 / 0.207163
=1.0351

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (70.147 + 335.545) / 416.582) / (1 - (72.921 + 342.737) / 424.906)
=0.026141 / 0.021765
=1.2011

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=241.327 / 228.512
=1.0561

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(54.394 / (54.394 + 342.737)) / (57.511 / (57.511 + 335.545))
=0.136967 / 0.146318
=0.9361

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(28.43 / 241.327) / (27.763 / 228.512)
=0.117807 / 0.121495
=0.9696

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((17.264 + 46.581) / 416.582) / ((18.154 + 59.694) / 424.906)
=0.153259 / 0.183212
=0.8365

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(10.104 - 0 - 4.488) / 416.582
=0.013481

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Ulma Construccion Polska has a M-score of -2.19 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -2.19 mean?
Ulma Construccion Polska (LTS:0O64) has a Beneish M-Score of -2.19 as of Aug. 04, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Ulma Construccion Polska and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Ulma Construccion Polska ranks #754 out of 1021 companies in the Business Services industry, placing it in the top 73.8%.
Is Ulma Construccion Polska's Beneish M-Score too high?
Ulma Construccion Polska's current Beneish M-Score is -2.19. Based on the distribution chart, Ulma Construccion Polska ranks #754 out of 1021 companies in the Business Services industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Ulma Construccion Polska has a GF Score™ of 81/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Ulma Construccion Polska's Beneish M-Score compare to URI and SUNB?
According to the Business Services industry distribution chart, Ulma Construccion Polska ranks #754 out of 1021 companies for Beneish M-Score. This places Ulma Construccion Polska in the lower half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Business Services company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Business Services industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Ulma Construccion Polska and its competitors. Ulma Construccion Polska's current Beneish M-Score is -2.19. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Ulma Construccion Polska stock overvalued right now?
Ulma Construccion Polska (LTS:0O64) has a current Beneish M-Score of -2.19. The stock's GF Value™ is zł88.03, compared to a current price of zł59.50 — trading 32.4% below its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -2.19. Ulma Construccion Polska's overall GF Score™ is 81/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Ulma Construccion Polska (LTS:0O64), the current Beneish M-Score is -2.19 as of Aug. 04, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Ulma Construccion Polska (LTS:0O64) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Ulma Construccion Polska stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of zł59.50 is trading 32.4% below its estimated GF Value™ of zł88.03.

Key valuation signals for LTS:0O64:

  • Beneish M-Score: -2.19
  • GF Value™: zł88.03 vs. price of zł59.50 (32.4% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 81/100 with 3 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the LTS:0O64 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Ulma Construccion Polska Business Description

Other Exchanges ULM:Poland
Address Koszajec 50, Brwinow, POL, 05-840
Ulma Construccion Polska SA offers vertical and horizontal formwork systems (shuttering systems) and scaffolding for the purposes of cubature and engineering construction, performance of maintenance works and application designs for these systems, as well as repairs of formwork systems and other accessories used in the assembly of formwork systems. It operates in the two segments namely construction site service, a segment that includes the rental of formwork and scaffolding systems along with broadly understood logistics service and construction settlement at the end of the contract; and sales of building materials, a segment that includes the sale of formwork systems that are components of fixed assets and turnover (products and goods) of the Group and other building materials.
81GF Score

Get the complete analysis for LTS:0O64

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł59.50
Price
zł88.03
GF Value