NAKA (Nakamoto) Beneish M-Score: 238.56 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — 4444% Above Median


NAKA Nakamoto Inc NAKA
6 GF Score
Price $3.95
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Nakamoto Beneish M-Score?

Nakamoto NAKA -2.23% 6 Beneish M-Score is 238.56 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is 4444% above its 10-year median of 5.25. GuruFocus rates NAKA with a GF Score™ of 6/100. The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 702 Capital Markets companies, Nakamoto ranks worse than 98.58% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Warning Sign:

Beneish M-Score 238.56 higher than -1.78, which implies that the company might have manipulated its financial results.

The historical rank and industry rank for Nakamoto's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

NAKA' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.61   Med: 5.25   Max: 238.56
Current: 238.56

During the past 5 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Nakamoto was 238.56. The lowest was -8.61. And the median was 5.25.

Nakamoto Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Nakamoto's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Nakamoto Beneish M-Score Chart

Nakamoto Annual Data
Trend Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Beneish M-Score
0.00 0.00 0.00 7.80 -5.17

Nakamoto Quarterly Data
Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.70 55.07 146.79 -5.17 238.56

NAKA vs CURN, BMHL, SRL: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Capital Markets subindustry, Nakamoto's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.

Nakamoto Beneish M-Score vs Capital Markets Industry

For the Capital Markets industry and Financial Services sector, Nakamoto's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Nakamoto's Beneish M-Score falls into.


NAKA
6GF Score
Nakamoto Inc NAKA
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Nakamoto Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Nakamoto for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 264.782+0.528 * 0.2255+0.404 * 3.9622+0.892 * 1.5864+0.115 * 0.2146
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 8.3786+4.679 * -0.340645-0.327 * 1.0054
=238.56

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Total Receivables was $5.88 Mil.
Revenue was 2.678 + 0.445 + 0.388 + 0.409 = $3.92 Mil.
Gross Profit was -4.901 + -10.626 + 0.386 + 0.401 = $-14.74 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $63.42 Mil.
Total Assets was $620.76 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $0.00 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $1.34 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $19.95 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $251.70 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Net Income was -238.776 + 37.259 + -86.036 + -2.414 = $-289.97 Mil.
Non Operating Income was -8.527 + 51.6 + -75.63 + -0.019 = $-32.58 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -23.285 + -7.568 + -13.168 + -1.911 = $-45.93 Mil.
 Total Receivables was $0.01 Mil.
Revenue was 0.58 + 0.604 + 0.648 + 0.639 = $2.47 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.431 + -2.881 + 0.64 + 0.577 = $-2.10 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1.30 Mil.
Total Assets was $2.56 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $0.69 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.19 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $1.50 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.56 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.47 Mil.

1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(5.881 / 3.92) / (0.014 / 2.471)
=1.500255 / 0.005666
=264.782

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(-2.095 / 2.471) / (-14.74 / 3.92)
=-0.847835 / -3.760204
=0.2255

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (63.419 + 0) / 620.761) / (1 - (1.295 + 0.688) / 2.564)
=0.897837 / 0.226599
=3.9622

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=3.92 / 2.471
=1.5864

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(0.188 / (0.188 + 0.688)) / (1.339 / (1.339 + 0))
=0.214612 / 1
=0.2146

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(19.951 / 3.92) / (1.501 / 2.471)
=5.089541 / 0.607446
=8.3786

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((0 + 251.699) / 620.761) / ((0.472 + 0.562) / 2.564)
=0.405468 / 0.403276
=1.0054

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(-289.967 - -32.576 - -45.932) / 620.761
=-0.340645

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Nakamoto has a M-score of 238.56 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of 238.56 mean?
Nakamoto (NAKA) has a Beneish M-Score of 238.56 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Nakamoto and its competitors. This is 4444% above median its historical median of 5.25. According to the industry distribution chart, Nakamoto ranks #692 out of 702 companies in the Capital Markets industry, placing it in the top 98.6%.
Is Nakamoto's Beneish M-Score too high?
Nakamoto's current Beneish M-Score of 238.56 is 4444% above median its 10-year median of 5.25. Based on the distribution chart, Nakamoto ranks #692 out of 702 companies in the Capital Markets industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Nakamoto has a GF Score™ of 6/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Nakamoto's Beneish M-Score compare to CURN and BMHL?
According to the Capital Markets industry distribution chart, Nakamoto ranks #692 out of 702 companies for Beneish M-Score. This places Nakamoto in the lower half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Capital Markets company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Capital Markets industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Nakamoto and its competitors. Nakamoto's current Beneish M-Score is 238.56, which is 4444% above median its own 10-year median of 5.25. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Nakamoto stock overvalued right now?
Nakamoto (NAKA) has a current Beneish M-Score of 238.56. The current Beneish M-Score is 238.56, which is 4444% above median its 10-year median of 5.25. Nakamoto's overall GF Score™ is 6/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Nakamoto (NAKA), the current Beneish M-Score is 238.56 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Nakamoto Business Description

Address 300 10th Avenue South, Nashville, TN, USA, 37203
Nakamoto Inc is a Bitcoin company building a world-wide portfolio of Bitcoin-native companies to provide commercial and financial infrastructure for the next generation of capital markets. The firm has two principal business segments: Bitcoin Operations, which houses its Bitcoin treasury and is utilized to support investments in other Bitcoin-related companies; Healthcare Operations, which provides a patient-focused healthcare experience that provides patients personalized solutions in order to reduce opioid use and improve health outcomes. The company generates the majority of its revenue from the Healthcare Operations.
6GF Score

Get the complete analysis for NAKA

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$3.95
Price