RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co (SHSE:603082) Beneish M-Score : -14.19 (As of Dec. 14, 2024)

View and export this data going back to 2024. Start your Free Trial

What is RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Beneish M-Score?

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -14.19 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SHSE:603082' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.19 Med: -4.03 Max: -2.06
Current: -14.19

During the past 5 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co was -2.06. The lowest was -14.19. And the median was -4.03.

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Beneish M-Score Chart

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Annual Data

Trend

Dec19

Dec20

Dec21

Dec22

Dec23

Beneish M-Score

-2.06

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Quarterly Data
	Dec19	Dec20	Dec21	Mar22	Jun22	Sep22	Dec22	Mar23	Jun23	Sep23	Dec23	Mar24	Jun24	Sep24
Beneish M-Score	Get a 7-Day Free Trial									-	-2.06	-	-2.25	-14.19

Competitive Comparison of RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co's Beneish M-Score

For the Specialty Industrial Machinery subindustry, RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co's Beneish M-Score falls into.

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

-4.84

0.92 * DSRI

0.528 * GMI

0.404 * AQI

0.892 * SGI

0.115 * DEPI

-4.84

0.92 * 0.7978

0.528 * 1.0153

0.404 * 1.0328

0.892 * 1.0761

0.115 * 1

0.172 * SGAI

4.679 * TATA

0.327 * LVGI

0.172 * 69.2069

4.679 * 0.009058

0.327 * 0.7804

-14.19

This Year (Sep24) TTM:

Last Year (Sep23) TTM:

Total Receivables was ¥892 Mil.
Revenue was 520.039 + 496.772 + 435.796 + 488.233 = ¥1,941 Mil.
Gross Profit was 105.33 + 76.097 + 74.542 + 87.398 = ¥343 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥3,977 Mil.
Total Assets was ¥4,219 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was ¥89 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was ¥0 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was ¥66 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥2,694 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥5 Mil.
Net Income was 50.493 + 30.054 + 41.23 + 35.623 = ¥157 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = ¥0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 67.658 + 44.237 + -3.539 + 10.826 = ¥119 Mil.

Total Receivables was ¥1,039 Mil.
Revenue was 514.16 + 429.197 + 431.912 + 428.275 = ¥1,804 Mil.
Gross Profit was 97.553 + 77.339 + 59.562 + 89.516 = ¥324 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥3,437 Mil.
Total Assets was ¥3,654 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was ¥89 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was ¥0 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was ¥1 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥2,988 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥8 Mil.

1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI	=	(Receivables_t / Revenue_t)	/	(Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
	=	(892.235 / 1940.84)	/	(1039.208 / 1803.544)
	=	0.459716	/	0.576203
	=	0.7978

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI	=	GrossMargin_t-1	/	GrossMargin_t
	=	(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)	/	(GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
	=	(323.97 / 1803.544)	/	(343.367 / 1940.84)
	=	0.17963	/	0.176917
	=	1.0153

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI	=	(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t)	/	(1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
	=	(1 - (3976.987 + 89.341) / 4219.3)	/	(1 - (3436.949 + 88.892) / 3654.112)
	=	0.036255	/	0.035103
	=	1.0328

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI	=	Sales_t	/	Sales_t-1
	=	Revenue_t	/	Revenue_t-1
	=	1940.84	/	1803.544
	=	1.0761

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI	=	(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1))	/	(Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
	=	(0 / (0 + 88.892))	/	(0 / (0 + 89.341))
	=	0	/	0
	=	1

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI	=	(SGA_t / Sales_t)	/	(SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
	=	(66.219 / 1940.84)	/	(0.889 / 1803.544)
	=	0.034119	/	0.000493
	=	69.2069

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI	=	((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t)	/	((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
	=	((5.106 + 2694.118) / 4219.3)	/	((8.043 + 2987.567) / 3654.112)
	=	0.639733	/	0.819792
	=	0.7804

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA	=	(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t	-	CashFlowsfromOperations_t)	/	TotalAssets_t
	=	(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t	-	CashFlowsfromOperations_t)	/	TotalAssets_t
	=	(157.4 - 0	-	119.182)	/	4219.3
	=	0.009058

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co has a M-score of -14.19 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Business Description

Industry

GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Ltd (SHSE:603082) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score

Comparable Companies

Traded in Other Exchanges

N/A

Address

Jiaochangkou Street, Building 3, No. 1, Xicheng District, Beijing, CHN, 100120

Website

https://www.bzkj.cn

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Ltd is engaged in research & development, design, manufacturing, and integration of intelligent logistics systems with automated three-dimensional warehouses as the core. It develops logistics equipment, control, and software systems, it provides customers with planning and design, equipment customization, control and software system development, installation and commissioning, system integration, and "turnkey" one-stop services for customer training. It is an intelligent logistics system solution provider.

RIAMB (Beijing) Technology Development Co Headlines

No Headlines