Nanoco Group (STU:GXG) Beneish M-Score: -2.79 (As of Jun. 26, 2026)


What is Nanoco Group Beneish M-Score?

Nanoco Group STU:GXG -6.06% Beneish M-Score is -2.79 as of Jun. 26, 2026. Among 987 Semiconductors companies, Nanoco Group ranks better than 72.44% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -2.79 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Nanoco Group's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

STU:GXG' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.67   Med: -2.76   Max: 10.4
Current: -2.79

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Nanoco Group was 10.40. The lowest was -10.67. And the median was -2.76.


Nanoco Group Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Nanoco Group's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Nanoco Group Beneish M-Score Chart

Nanoco Group Annual Data
Trend Jul16 Jul17 Jul18 Jul19 Jul20 Jul21 Jul22 Jul23 Jul24 Jul25
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.55 -3.60 10.40 -10.67 -2.79

Nanoco Group Semi-Annual Data
Jul16 Jan17 Jul17 Jan18 Jul18 Jan19 Jul19 Jan20 Jul20 Jan21 Jul21 Jan22 Jul22 Jan23 Jul23 Jan24 Jul24 Jan25 Jul25 Jan26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 -10.67 0.00 -2.79 0.00

STU:GXG vs LRCX, AMAT, KLAC: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials subindustry, Nanoco Group's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Nanoco Group Beneish M-Score vs Semiconductors Industry

For the Semiconductors industry and Technology sector, Nanoco Group's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Nanoco Group's Beneish M-Score falls into.



Nanoco Group Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Nanoco Group for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 0.3518+0.528 * 0.9215+0.404 * 0.9042+0.892 * 0.9431+0.115 * 0.6727
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.2396+4.679 * 0.125743-0.327 * 1.3621
=-2.82

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jul25) TTM:Last Year (Jul24) TTM:
Total Receivables was €0.28 Mil.
Revenue was €8.81 Mil.
Gross Profit was €8.09 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €17.70 Mil.
Total Assets was €24.55 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was €3.41 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was €1.58 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was €8.41 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €9.52 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €0.76 Mil.
Net Income was €-2.54 Mil.
Gross Profit was €0.00 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was €-5.63 Mil.
Total Receivables was €0.84 Mil.
Revenue was €9.34 Mil.
Gross Profit was €7.91 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €26.18 Mil.
Total Assets was €36.39 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was €4.56 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was €1.23 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was €7.19 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €9.65 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €1.53 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(0.28 / 8.811) / (0.844 / 9.343)
=0.031778 / 0.090335
=0.3518

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(7.906 / 9.343) / (8.091 / 8.811)
=0.846195 / 0.918284
=0.9215

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (17.7 + 3.405) / 24.55) / (1 - (26.183 + 4.555) / 36.385)
=0.140326 / 0.155201
=0.9042

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=8.811 / 9.343
=0.9431

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(1.233 / (1.233 + 4.555)) / (1.578 / (1.578 + 3.405))
=0.213027 / 0.316677
=0.6727

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(8.405 / 8.811) / (7.19 / 9.343)
=0.953921 / 0.76956
=1.2396

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((0.758 + 9.516) / 24.55) / ((1.528 + 9.651) / 36.385)
=0.418493 / 0.307242
=1.3621

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(-2.541 - 0 - -5.628) / 24.55
=0.125743

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Nanoco Group has a M-score of -2.82 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -2.79 mean?
Nanoco Group (STU:GXG) has a Beneish M-Score of -2.79 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Nanoco Group and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Nanoco Group ranks #272 out of 987 companies in the Semiconductors industry, placing it in the top 27.6%.
Is Nanoco Group's Beneish M-Score too high?
Nanoco Group's current Beneish M-Score is -2.79. Based on the distribution chart, Nanoco Group ranks #272 out of 987 companies in the Semiconductors industry, which is above the industry midpoint.
How does Nanoco Group's Beneish M-Score compare to LRCX and AMAT?
According to the Semiconductors industry distribution chart, Nanoco Group ranks #272 out of 987 companies for Beneish M-Score. This puts Nanoco Group in the upper half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Semiconductors company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Semiconductors industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Nanoco Group and its competitors. Nanoco Group's current Beneish M-Score is -2.79. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Nanoco Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Nanoco Group (STU:GXG) is currently considered Significantly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is €0.30, compared to a current price of €0.03 — trading 89.7% below its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -2.79. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Nanoco Group (STU:GXG), the current Beneish M-Score is -2.79 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Nanoco Group Business Description

Other Exchanges NNOCF:USANANOl:UKNANO:UK
Address The Heath Business & Technical Park, Heath Road South, Science Centre, Runcorn, GBR, WA7 4QX
Nanoco Group PLC is a UK-based company which is engaged in research, development, and manufacturing of heavy-metal-free quantum dots and semiconductor nanoparticles. Its products include CFQD quantum dots, Heatwave quantum dots, and nanoparticles which offer the potential for display, lighting, solar and biological imaging applications. The company's revenue comes from joint development agreements, individual project development programs and the sale of quantum dot products. Geographically, the company generates majority of its revenue from its business in South Korea and also has its presence in Taiwan, France, United States, United Kingdom, Japan and other countries.