Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Energy MetalsEYMTF 31 Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -1.17% as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus rates EYMTF with a GF Score™ of 31/100. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 185 Other Energy Sources companies, Energy Metals ranks worse than 53.51% on this metric.
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated as Net Income divided by its average total tangible assets. Total tangible assets equals to Total Assets minus Intangible Assets. Energy Metals's annualizedNet Income for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $-0.38 Mil. Energy Metals's average total tangible assets for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $32.21 Mil. Therefore, Energy Metals's annualized Return-on-Tangible-Asset for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was -1.17%.
The historical rank and industry rank for Energy Metals's Return-on-Tangible-Asset or its related term are showing as below:
EYMTF'
s Return-on-Tangible-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.62 Med: -1.05 Max: -0.71
Current: -1.07
During the past 13 years, Energy Metals's highest Return-on-Tangible-Asset was -0.71%. The lowest was -1.62%. And the median was -1.05%.
EYMTF's Return-on-Tangible-Asset is ranked worse than 53.51% of 185
companies
in the Other Energy Sources industry
Industry Median: -0.51
vs EYMTF: -1.07
Energy Metals (OTCPK:EYMTF) Return-on-Tangible-Asset Explanation
Return-on-Tangible-Asset measures the rate of return on the average total tangible assets (total assets minus intangible assets). Tangible means physical in nature. Intangible Assets are assets that are not physical in nature, and typically "derive their value from legal or intellectual rights." Return-on-Tangible-Asset measures a firm's efficiency at generating profits from its tangible assets. It shows how well a company uses what it has to generate earnings. Return-on-Tangible-Assets can vary drastically across industries. Therefore, Return-on-Tangible-Asset should not be used to compare companies in different industries.
Be Aware
Like ROE and ROA, Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated with only 12 months data. Fluctuations in the companys earnings or business cycles can affect the ratio drastically. It is important to look at the ratio from a long term perspective. Return-on-Tangible-Asset can be affected by events such as stock buyback or issuance, and by a companys tax rate and its interest payment. Return-on-Tangible-Asset may not reflect the true earning power of the assets. A more accurate measurement is ROC % (ROC).
Many analysts argue the higher return the better. Buffett states that really high Return-on-Tangible-Asset may indicate vulnerability in the durability of the competitive advantage.
Energy Metals Return-on-Tangible-Asset Related Terms
Energy Metals Return-on-Tangible-Asset Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Energy Metals's Return-on-Tangible-Asset can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
EYMTF vs UEC, LEU: Return-on-Tangible-Asset Comparison
For the Uranium subindustry, Energy Metals's Return-on-Tangible-Asset, along with its competitors' market caps and Return-on-Tangible-Asset data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Energy Metals Return-on-Tangible-Asset vs Other Energy Sources Industry
For the Other Energy Sources industry and Energy sector, Energy Metals's Return-on-Tangible-Asset distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Energy Metals's Return-on-Tangible-Asset falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Return-on-Tangible-Asset, the net income of the last fiscal year and the average total tangible assets over the fiscal year are used. In calculating the quarterly data,
the Net Income data used here is two times the semi-annual (Dec. 2025) net income data.
What does a Return-on-Tangible-Asset of -1.17% mean?
Energy Metals (EYMTF) has a Return-on-Tangible-Asset of -1.17% as of Dec. 2025. Return on tangible assets is the ratio of current-period net income to average two-period tangible assets. View historical data on Energy Metals and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Energy Metals ranks #99 out of 185 companies in the Other Energy Sources industry, placing it in the top 53.5%.
Is Energy Metals' Return-on-Tangible-Asset too high?
Energy Metals' current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -1.17%. Based on the distribution chart, Energy Metals ranks #99 out of 185 companies in the Other Energy Sources industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Energy Metals has a GF Score™ of 31/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Energy Metals' Return-on-Tangible-Asset compare to UEC and LEU?
According to the Other Energy Sources industry distribution chart, Energy Metals ranks #99 out of 185 companies for Return-on-Tangible-Asset. This places Energy Metals in the lower half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Return-on-Tangible-Asset for an Other Energy Sources company?
A good Return-on-Tangible-Asset depends on the Other Energy Sources industry context. However, Return-on-Tangible-Asset should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Return-on-Tangible-Asset mean?
A high Return-on-Tangible-Asset can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Return on tangible assets is the ratio of current-period net income to average two-period tangible assets. View historical data on Energy Metals and its competitors. Energy Metals's current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -1.17%. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Energy Metals stock overvalued right now?
Energy Metals (EYMTF) has a current Return-on-Tangible-Asset of -1.17%. The current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -1.17%. Energy Metals' overall GF Score™ is 31/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Return-on-Tangible-Asset calculated?
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Energy Metals (EYMTF), the current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -1.17% as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Energy Metals Ltd is an Australian uranium exploration company with a portfolio of projects located in the Northern Territory: Bigrlyi, Ngalia Regiona and Western Australia: Anketell, Mopoke Well, Lakeside, Manyingee, and Lake Mason. The company has one reportable segment of its business, being uranium exploration in Australia.
31GF Score
Get the complete analysis for EYMTF
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
EYMTF has been successfully added to your 
