Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Standard Development GroupHKSE:01867 41 Altman Z-Score is 0.80 as of Aug. 22, 2026, which is 83% below its 10-year median of 4.79. GuruFocus rates HKSE:01867 with a GF Score™ of 41/100 and a GF Value™ of HK$0.09 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 11 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,058 Business Services companies, Standard Development Group ranks worse than 86.11% on this metric.
The Altman Z-Score is a model designed to predict the likelihood of a company going bankrupt within the next two years. Created by American finance professor Edward Altman in 1968, the model is specifically designed for publicly traded manufacturing companies with assets greater than $1 million.
Warning Sign:
Altman Z-score of 0.8 is in distress zone. This implies bankruptcy possibility in the next two years.
Standard Development Group has a Altman Z-Score of 0.80, indicating it is in Distress Zones. This implies bankrupcy possibility in the next two years.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
When Altman Z-Score <= 1.8, it is in Distress Zones.
When Altman Z-Score >= 3, it is in Safe Zones.
When Altman Z-Score is between 1.8 and 3, it is in Grey Zones.
The historical rank and industry rank for Standard Development Group's Altman Z-Score or its related term are showing as below:
HKSE:01867'
s Altman Z-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8 Med: 4.79 Max: 10.53
Current: 0.8
During the past 12 years, Standard Development Group's highest Altman Z-Score was 10.53. The lowest was 0.80. And the median was 4.79.
Standard Development Group (HKSE:01867) Altman Z-Score Explanation
X1: The Working Capital/Total Assets (WC/TA) ratio is a measure of the net liquid assets of the firm relative to the total capitalization. Working capital is defined as the difference between current assets and current liabilities. Ordinarily, a firm experiencing consistent operating losses will have shrinking current assets in relation to total assets. Altman found this one proved to be the most valuable liquidity ratio comparing with the current ratio and the quick ratio. This is however the least significant of the five factors.
X2: Retained Earnings/Total Assets: the RE/TA ratio measures the leverage of a firm. Retained earnings is the account which reports the total amount of reinvested earnings and/or losses of a firm over its entire life. Those firms with high RE, relative to TA, have financed their assets through retention of profits and have not utilized as much debt.
X3, Earnings Before Interest and Taxes/Total Assets (EBIT/TA): This ratio is a measure of the true productivity of the firm's assets, independent of any tax or leverage factors. Since a firm's ultimate existence is based on the earning power of its assets, this ratio appears to be particularly appropriate for studies dealing with corporate failure. This ratio continually outperforms other profitability measures, including cash flow.
X4, Market Value of Equity/Book Value of Total Liabilities (MVE/TL): The measure shows how much the firm's assets can decline in value (measured by market value of equity plus debt) before the liabilities exceed the assets and the firm becomes insolvent.
X5, Revenue/Total Assets (S/TA): The capital-turnover ratio is a standard financial ratio illustrating the sales generating ability of the firm's assets.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
HKSE:01867 vs VRSK, EFX, BAH: Altman Z-Score Comparison
For the Consulting Services subindustry, Standard Development Group's Altman Z-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Altman Z-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Standard Development Group Altman Z-Score vs Business Services Industry
For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Standard Development Group's Altman Z-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Standard Development Group's Altman Z-Score falls into.
Standard Development Group Altman Z-Score Calculation
Altman Z-Score model is an accurate forecaster of failure up to two years prior to distress. It can be considered the assessment of the distress of industrial corporations.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency. GuruFocus does not calculate Altman Z-Score when X4 or X5 value is 0.
Standard Development Group (HKSE:01867) has a Altman Z-Score of 0.80 as of Aug. 22, 2026. The Altman Z-score measures a company's bankruptcy risk. View historical data on Standard Development Group and its competitors. This is 83% below median its historical median of 4.79. Over the past decade, Standard Development Group's Altman Z-Score has ranged from 0.80 to 10.53. According to the industry distribution chart, Standard Development Group ranks #911 out of 1058 companies in the Business Services industry, placing it in the top 86.1%.
Is Standard Development Group's Altman Z-Score too high?
Standard Development Group's current Altman Z-Score of 0.80 is 83% below median its 10-year median of 4.79. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 0.80 to a high of 10.53. The Business Services industry median Altman Z-Score is 2.93. Standard Development Group's value of 0.80 is 72.7% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Standard Development Group ranks #911 out of 1058 companies in the Business Services industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Standard Development Group has a GF Score™ of 41/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Standard Development Group's Altman Z-Score compare to VRSK and EFX?
According to the Business Services industry distribution chart, Standard Development Group ranks #911 out of 1058 companies for Altman Z-Score. This places Standard Development Group in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Altman Z-Score is 2.93. Standard Development Group's value of 0.80 is 72.7% below this benchmark. Historically, Standard Development Group's own Altman Z-Score has ranged from 0.80 to 10.53 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.79 vs. the industry median of 2.93, Standard Development Group has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Altman Z-Score for a Business Services company?
The median Altman Z-Score among Business Services companies is 2.93, based on 1,058 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Altman Z-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Altman Z-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Standard Development Group's current Altman Z-Score of 0.80 is 72.7% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Altman Z-Score mean?
A high Altman Z-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Altman Z-score measures a company's bankruptcy risk. View historical data on Standard Development Group and its competitors. For the Business Services industry, the median Altman Z-Score is 2.93 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Standard Development Group's current Altman Z-Score is 0.80, which is 83% below median its own 10-year median of 4.79. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Standard Development Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Standard Development Group (HKSE:01867) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is HK$0.09, compared to a current price of HK$0.23 — trading 154.4% above its estimated fair value. The current Altman Z-Score is 0.80, which is 83% below median its 10-year median of 4.79 and 72.7% below the Business Services industry median of 2.93. Standard Development Group's overall GF Score™ is 41/100 with 11 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Altman Z-Score calculated?
Altman Z-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Standard Development Group (HKSE:01867), the current Altman Z-Score is 0.80 as of Aug. 22, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Standard Development Group (HKSE:01867) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Standard Development Group stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of HK$0.23 is trading 154.4% above its estimated GF Value™ of HK$0.09.
GuruFocus considers Standard Development Group to be Significantly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for HKSE:01867:
Altman Z-Score: 0.80 (83% below median its 10-year median of 4.79)
GF Value™: HK$0.09 vs. price of HK$0.23 (154.4% above fair value)
Industry Position: 72.7% below the Business Services median (#911 of 1058)
No single metric tells the full story. See the HKSE:01867 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Standard Development Group Ltd is engaged in construction and engineering-related businesses, including interior fitting-out and renovation services, alteration, and addition work for properties, and petroleum trading and farming businesses. The company's reportable segment includes the Construction and engineering-related business, Petroleum business, Farming business and Bio-energy business. The majority of its revenue comes from the Petroleum business segment which engaged in the Construction and engineering related business.
41GF Score
Get the complete analysis for HKSE:01867
Altman Z-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
HKSE:01867 has been successfully added to your 
