Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
HammockTSE:173A +1.72%19 Altman Z-Score is 3.18 as of Jul. 16, 2026, which is 3% above its 10-year median of 3.09. GuruFocus rates TSE:173A with a GF Score™ of 19/100. Among 2,766 Software companies, Hammock ranks worse than 50.22% on this metric.
The Altman Z-Score is a model designed to predict the likelihood of a company going bankrupt within the next two years. Created by American finance professor Edward Altman in 1968, the model is specifically designed for publicly traded manufacturing companies with assets greater than $1 million.
Good Sign:
Altman Z-score of 3.14 is strong.
Hammock has a Altman Z-Score of 3.18, indicating it is in Safe Zones. This implies the Altman Z-Score is strong.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
When Altman Z-Score <= 1.8, it is in Distress Zones.
When Altman Z-Score >= 3, it is in Safe Zones.
When Altman Z-Score is between 1.8 and 3, it is in Grey Zones.
The historical rank and industry rank for Hammock's Altman Z-Score or its related term are showing as below:
TSE:173A'
s Altman Z-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.02 Med: 3.09 Max: 3.16
Current: 3.14
During the past 5 years, Hammock's highest Altman Z-Score was 3.16. The lowest was 3.02. And the median was 3.09.
Hammock (TSE:173A) Altman Z-Score Explanation
X1: The Working Capital/Total Assets (WC/TA) ratio is a measure of the net liquid assets of the firm relative to the total capitalization. Working capital is defined as the difference between current assets and current liabilities. Ordinarily, a firm experiencing consistent operating losses will have shrinking current assets in relation to total assets. Altman found this one proved to be the most valuable liquidity ratio comparing with the current ratio and the quick ratio. This is however the least significant of the five factors.
X2: Retained Earnings/Total Assets: the RE/TA ratio measures the leverage of a firm. Retained earnings is the account which reports the total amount of reinvested earnings and/or losses of a firm over its entire life. Those firms with high RE, relative to TA, have financed their assets through retention of profits and have not utilized as much debt.
X3, Earnings Before Interest and Taxes/Total Assets (EBIT/TA): This ratio is a measure of the true productivity of the firm's assets, independent of any tax or leverage factors. Since a firm's ultimate existence is based on the earning power of its assets, this ratio appears to be particularly appropriate for studies dealing with corporate failure. This ratio continually outperforms other profitability measures, including cash flow.
X4, Market Value of Equity/Book Value of Total Liabilities (MVE/TL): The measure shows how much the firm's assets can decline in value (measured by market value of equity plus debt) before the liabilities exceed the assets and the firm becomes insolvent.
X5, Revenue/Total Assets (S/TA): The capital-turnover ratio is a standard financial ratio illustrating the sales generating ability of the firm's assets.
Altman Z-Score does not apply to financial companies.
Hammock Altman Z-Score Related Terms
Hammock Altman Z-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Hammock's Altman Z-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
TSE:173A vs MSFT, ORCL, PLTR: Altman Z-Score Comparison
For the Software - Infrastructure subindustry, Hammock's Altman Z-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Altman Z-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Hammock Altman Z-Score vs Software Industry
For the Software industry and Technology sector, Hammock's Altman Z-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Hammock's Altman Z-Score falls into.
Altman Z-Score model is an accurate forecaster of failure up to two years prior to distress. It can be considered the assessment of the distress of industrial corporations.
Hammock's Altman Z-Score for today is calculated with this formula:
Z
=
1.2
*
X1
+
1.4
*
X2
+
3.3
*
X3
+
0.6
*
X4
+
1.0
*
X5
=
1.2
*
0.3921
+
1.4
*
0.4222
+
3.3
*
0.147
+
0.6
*
1.5748
+
1.0
*
0.6872
=
3.18
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency. GuruFocus does not calculate Altman Z-Score when X4 or X5 value is 0.
Hammock (TSE:173A) has a Altman Z-Score of 3.18 as of Jul. 16, 2026. The Altman Z-score measures a company's bankruptcy risk. View historical data on Hammock and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 3.09. Over the past decade, Hammock's Altman Z-Score has ranged from 3.02 to 3.16. According to the industry distribution chart, Hammock ranks #1389 out of 2766 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 50.2%.
Is Hammock's Altman Z-Score too high?
Hammock's current Altman Z-Score of 3.18 is near median its 10-year median of 3.09. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.02 to a high of 3.16. The Software industry median Altman Z-Score is 3.16. Hammock's value of 3.18 is 0.6% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Hammock ranks #1389 out of 2766 companies in the Software industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Hammock has a GF Score™ of 19/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Hammock's Altman Z-Score compare to MSFT and ORCL?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Hammock ranks #1389 out of 2766 companies for Altman Z-Score. This places Hammock in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Altman Z-Score is 3.16. Hammock's value of 3.18 is 0.6% above this benchmark. Historically, Hammock's own Altman Z-Score has ranged from 3.02 to 3.16 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.09 vs. the industry median of 3.16, Hammock has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Altman Z-Score for a Software company?
The median Altman Z-Score among Software companies is 3.16, based on 2,766 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Altman Z-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Altman Z-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Hammock's current Altman Z-Score of 3.18 is 0.6% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Altman Z-Score mean?
A high Altman Z-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Altman Z-score measures a company's bankruptcy risk. View historical data on Hammock and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Altman Z-Score is 3.16 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Hammock's current Altman Z-Score is 3.18, which is near median its own 10-year median of 3.09. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Hammock stock overvalued right now?
Hammock (TSE:173A) has a current Altman Z-Score of 3.18. The current Altman Z-Score is 3.18, which is near median its 10-year median of 3.09 and 0.6% above the Software industry median of 3.16. Hammock's overall GF Score™ is 19/100. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Altman Z-Score calculated?
Altman Z-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Hammock (TSE:173A), the current Altman Z-Score is 3.18 as of Jul. 16, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Hammock Inc is engaged in development and provision of business support systems and cloud services related to "IT asset management and security measures", "sales support and business card management", and "data entry using AI-based character recognition".
19GF Score
Get the complete analysis for TSE:173A
Altman Z-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
TSE:173A has been successfully added to your 
