Business Description
ISIN : US22160N1090
Share Class Description:
CSGP: Ordinary SharesTotal Employee Number:
8,000Financial Strength
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash-To-Debt | 1.05 | |||||
Equity-to-Asset | 0.78 | |||||
Debt-to-Equity | 0.15 | |||||
Debt-to-EBITDA | 3.05 | |||||
Interest Coverage | 38.5 | |||||
Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | |||||
Altman Z-Score | 4.19 | |||||
Beneish M-Score | -2.23 | |||||
WACC vs ROIC | ||||||
Growth Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate | 12.1 | |||||
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate | -32.6 | |||||
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate | -11.8 | |||||
3-Year FCF Growth Rate | -53.6 | |||||
3-Year Book Growth Rate | 5.7 | |||||
Future 3-5Y EPS without NRI Growth Rate Estimate Industry Rank | 35.62 | |||||
Future 3-5Y Total Revenue Growth Rate Estimate | 12.61 |
Momentum Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-Day RSI | 27.05 | |||||
9-Day RSI | 38.82 | |||||
14-Day RSI | 44.54 | |||||
3-1 Month Momentum % | -9.43 | |||||
6-1 Month Momentum % | -37.49 | |||||
12-1 Month Momentum % | -65.66 |
Liquidity Ratio
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Ratio | 2.21 | |||||
Quick Ratio | 2.21 | |||||
Cash Ratio | 1.69 | |||||
Days Sales Outstanding | 24.71 | |||||
Days Payable | 21.48 |
Dividend & Buy Back
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio | -0.9 | |||||
Shareholder Yield % | 7.92 |
Profitability Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Margin % | 78.68 | |||||
Operating Margin % | 2.17 | |||||
Net Margin % | 2.07 | |||||
EBITDA Margin % | 11.08 | |||||
FCF Margin % | 6.38 | |||||
OCF Margin % | 13.98 | |||||
ROE % | 0.89 | |||||
ROA % | 0.71 | |||||
ROIC % | 0.68 | |||||
3-Year ROIIC % | -6.76 | |||||
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % | 5.36 | |||||
ROCE % | 0.8 | |||||
Years of Profitability over Past 10-Year | 10 | |||||
Moat Score | 7 | |||||
Tariff Resilience Score | 9 |
GF Value Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PE Ratio | 155.32 | |||||
Forward PE Ratio | 16.98 | |||||
PE Ratio without NRI | 27.07 | |||||
Shiller PE Ratio | 42.16 | |||||
PS Ratio | 3.46 | |||||
PB Ratio | 1.51 | |||||
Price-to-Tangible-Book | 9.31 | |||||
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow | 54.34 | |||||
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow | 24.85 | |||||
EV-to-EBIT | 154.63 | |||||
EV-to-Forward-EBIT | 21.84 | |||||
EV-to-EBITDA | 30.22 | |||||
EV-to-Forward-EBITDA | 13.53 | |||||
EV-to-Revenue | 3.35 | |||||
EV-to-Forward-Revenue | 2.93 | |||||
EV-to-FCF | 52.45 | |||||
Price-to-GF-Value | 0.28 | |||||
Price-to-Projected-FCF | 1.31 | |||||
Price-to-Median-PS-Value | 0.26 | |||||
Price-to-Graham-Number | 3.35 | |||||
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % | 0.65 | |||||
FCF Yield % | 1.9 | |||||
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % | -22.62 |
Operating Revenue by Business Segment
Operating Revenue by Geographic Region
Historical Operating Revenue by Business Segment
Historical Operating Revenue by Geographic Region
Guru Trades
See DetailsInsider Trades
See DetailsGurus Latest Trades with NAS:CSGP
Peter Lynch Chart
Performance
Annualized Return % Â
Total Annual Return % Â
CoStar Group Inc Executives
DetailsAnalyst Estimate
Key Statistics
| Name | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) (Mil $) | 3,555.5 | ||
| EPS (TTM) ($) | 0.19 | ||
| Beta | 0.6268 | ||
| 3-Year Sharpe Ratio | -0.89 | ||
| 3-Year Sortino Ratio | -1.04 | ||
| Volatility % | 34.92 | ||
| 14-Day RSI | 44.54 | ||
| 14-Day ATR ($) | 1.371129 | ||
| 20-Day SMA ($) | 31.881 | ||
| 12-1 Month Momentum % | -65.66 | ||
| 52-Week Range ($) | 25.894 - 90.72 | ||
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 405.2 |
Piotroski F-Score Details
| Component | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Piotroski F-Score | 6 | ||
| Positive ROA | |||
| Positive CFROA | |||
| Higher ROA yoy | |||
| CFROA > ROA | |||
| Lower Leverage yoy | |||
| Higher Current Ratio yoy | |||
| Less Shares Outstanding yoy | |||
| Higher Gross Margin yoy | |||
| Higher Asset Turnover yoy |
CoStar Group Inc Filings
| Filing Date | Document Date | Form | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Filing Data | ||||
CoStar Group Inc Stock Events
| Event | Date | Price ($) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual report for 2026 | 2027-02-26 | In 170 days | ||
| Fourth quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2027-02-24 17:00 | In 169 days | ||
| Fourth quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2027-02-24 | In 168 days | ||
| Third quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-10-28 17:00 | In 50 days | ||
| Third quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2026-10-28 | In 49 days | ||
| Second quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-07-28 17:00 | 29.17 (+3.99%) | ||
| Second quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2026-07-28 | 29.17 (+3.99%) | ||
| General meeting for 2026 | 2026-06-23 10:00 | 29.22 (-2.76%) | ||
| First quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-04-28 17:00 | 36.24 (+0.11%) | ||
| First quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2026-04-28 | 36.24 (+0.11%) |
CoStar Group Inc Frequently Asked Questions
Guru Commentaries on NAS:CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc. reported first-quarter results that surpassed consensus expectations for both revenue and profitability, marking the 60th consecutive quarter of double-digit revenue growth. While we viewed the quarterly results positively, we believe the market focused on softer net new bookings which weighed on shares. We remain focused on Homes.com subscriber growth as a key component of our long-term model. We believe the stock is trading at a meaningful discount to a conservative set of expectations, but given the sustained underperformance of the stock, we continue to perform enhanced due diligence on the Company.
CoStar’s management has successfully navigated challenges posed by an activist investor and remains committed to its residential real estate strategy. Despite investor skepticism regarding management's plan, the current pricing reflects an excessive punishment for the company. We believe that CoStar's strategic direction and management resilience position it well for future growth, making it an attractive investment opportunity at this time.
CoStar Group was one of the top five detractors to absolute returns in the quarter. The manager notes that while fundamentals remain solid for many companies, CoStar Group has not been immune from the broad de-rating in 'quality growth' stocks. This suggests that the market is currently unfavorable for CoStar Group, reflecting a shift in investor sentiment away from companies not deemed as beneficiaries of the AI ecosystem.
CoStar’s management has successfully navigated challenges posed by an activist investor and remains committed to its residential real estate strategy. Despite investor skepticism regarding management's plan, the current pricing reflects an excessive punishment for the company. We believe that the market has overreacted, presenting a compelling opportunity for investment in CoStar.
CoStar Group (CSGP) is mentioned in the context of AI adoption, specifically regarding its launch of Homes Ai and Apartments.com Ai, which adds conversational natural language search capabilities to its online portals. The company leverages its proprietary property data and imagery, indicating a focus on enhancing its competitive position through technology.
CoStar Group, Inc. was mentioned as part of a discussion on subscription-based software and platform investments that faced valuation pressures due to increased competition from AI. However, the letter notes that despite these valuation challenges, CoStar Group, Inc. continues to generate strong revenue growth and margins in line with expectations.
CoStar Group was mentioned as one of the top detractors in the quarter, alongside other companies. The letter indicates that material trims of CoStar Group during the quarter helped limit the portfolio impact. However, there is no explicit bullish or bearish argument made regarding the company's future performance or valuation.
CoStar Group was mentioned as one of the top detractors in the quarter, alongside other companies. The letter indicates that the Fund made material trims to CoStar Group during the quarter to limit portfolio impact, but it does not provide a specific argument for or against the company going forward.
CoStar Group is a premier information services provider to the commercial and residential real estate industries. Its core businesses are dominant, have high barriers to entry, produce copious amounts of free cash flow, and historically have grown at a double digit rate. However, we no longer qualify CoStar Group for investment because of poor capital allocation. The company has taken virtually all of its free cash flow and reinvested it into Homes.com in an attempt to disrupt the residential brokerage portal industry, which has not worked. Management now states that Homes.com will not be profitable until 2030, 8 years after its launch. Therefore, we sold CoStar to reallocate capital into more discounted companies with better management teams.
We no longer believe that our original thesis holds true today and have disposed of our position in its entirety. CEO Andy Florance has continued what can only be seen as a reckless drain on a majority of the company’s operating income into Homes.com and related acquisitions even as the share price has continued to plummet. It appears to us that Mr. Florance’s obsession with Homes.com has diverted attention from core business areas, calling into question management’s ability to maintain a competitive edge in Apartments.com and the CoStar Suite in a rapidly changing market and with no apparent plan for a world increasingly shaped by AI.

